User talk:Simesa

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   22:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

User: Benjamin Gatti
Just letting you know that he's back. --User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 04:48, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Nuclear power/nuclear energy
There is a discussion about usage of nuclear power v nuclear energy. As an experienced editor in this field you are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel (talk) 15:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:LSST CAMERA scale 250x188.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LSST CAMERA scale 250x188.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:LSST TELESCOPE SIDE VIEW 150dpi.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LSST TELESCOPE SIDE VIEW 150dpi.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Returnship for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Returnship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Returnship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Intertel (group)


The article Intertel (group) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I've just checked Google, Google Books, and Google Scholar, and there appears to be no reliable source with which to verify even the bare existence of this organization, much less to show its notability under WP:ORG. I've put a notice asking for reliable sources (linked to WP:RS for ease of reference) on the article talk page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 05:37, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Intertel (group) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intertel (group) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Intertel (group) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I look forward to seeing you in the discussion. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 03:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of International Society for Philosophical Enquiry for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Society for Philosophical Enquiry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/International Society for Philosophical Enquiry & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 19:19, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Reviving Username
I haven't logged on since significantly before the big change, so bear with me while I re-learn the editing skills.

I'm somewhat surprised that Wikipedia was unable to find either Intertel or the ISPE!!! Both very much exist.

Simesa (talk) 10:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Welcome back aboard. There have been some policy changes too since you last actively edited, and indeed WP:ORG now makes clear that mere existence is not enough to establish notability for an organization. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a directory, so we have articles about organizations such that there is plenty of independent sources about the organization through which to build an article with neutral point of view. Many organizations are too tiny and little known to meet that standard (including some I belong to). -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 16:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Notre Dame Broadcasting Corporation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Notre Dame Broadcasting Corporation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Notre Dame Broadcasting Corporation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —theenjay36 20:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

IFNEC
Hi. You started the article on IFNEC. Sadly, the article is horribly out of date, and has been for five years. Also, the AFCI article should, IMHO, be merged into the IFNEC article. Since you started the IFNEC article, do you know what happened to it? All the primary website links are down. And do you support merging AFCI into IFNEC? I tried getting AFCI deleted, but I could not get consensus for that. --Ysangkok (talk) 21:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Shipping Cask 02.jpg
You uploaded, File:Shipping Cask 02.jpg. Wikipedia needs the permission to be explicit and proven at the time of upload.

Please read Requesting copyright permission, which advises on how to confirm the permission you obtained from a third party.

It is also advisable to ask the third-party what source attribution they desire, as opposed to marking the image as having been "sent personally".Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:44, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Risk analysis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Risk analysis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Risk analysis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 20:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Whole Barn Award.jpg


The file File:Whole Barn Award.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 06:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

"Cominterm" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Cominterm. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 01:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of anti-sexual assault organizations in the United States for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of anti-sexual assault organizations in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of anti-sexual assault organizations in the United States& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)