User talk:Simon Adler/Archive 1(counter)d

Rodin
Hi, you'll need to put a reference regarding Rodin on the Ravioli page - Most people would associate Rodin with sculpture.Clovis Sangrail (talk) 04:04, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * All Good! Clovis Sangrail (talk) 04:32, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The best way to figure things out is just to try (For coded bits like references, It can help to copy from other places and just change the bits you need). You can always roll it back to a previous version if you make a mistake. You can't really go too wrong (though I would advise being careful on any topic that's political - some people get pretty worked up there..) Clovis Sangrail (talk) 04:47, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,

the wub (talk) 17:36, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

Thanks!
Thanks for the barnstar! You seem to have all the qualities (and the dedication) to be an excellent wiki-editor. Hope you learn the essential tools and scripts quickly, for contributing without being hampered. You are welcome to ask me for help, or can simply use the advanced search (ticking only the "help" option). Anir1uph (talk) 03:22, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Adding reference on wiki articles
Hello Irondome! Please do not forget to add references for the content you add to Wikipedia. Adding a well formatted references is very easy to do. This will add a well formatted reference that would be helpful in case the website link (web URL) becomes inactive (dead/link rot) after some time. You can read more about it on Help:Edit toolbar or see this video File:RefTools.ogv. thanks and regards -- D Big X ray  07:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
 * 2) Then click on "templates",
 * 3) Choose the most appropriate template and fill as many details as you can,


 * to use this message place  on User_talk

 D Big X ray  07:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Edit summary
Please type reasonable edit summary about your changes. typing four tildes "~&#126;" is not needed in edit summaries anywhere. typing four tildes "~&#126;" is only needed when you are posting a comment on talk page, even there you should only sign at the end of "your comment" on the talk page and not in the edit box. I hope this helps, feel free to ask any further clarification. Happy editing, cheers. -- D Big X ray  08:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I can understand what caused this. The 2nd thread on this page, clearly explains your over cautiousness . Even in my early days, I was terrorized and regularly haunted by SineBot. and as if that was not enough, an editor came and posted a horrific image File:SineBot gerbil.jpg on my talk page. :) Luckily the haunting did not last for too long. and I learnt my way like you. cheers-- D Big X ray  10:03, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

A gerbil on steroids is not a good motivator. Damn! :) Irondome (talk) 10:10, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * LOL -- D Big X ray   10:14, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Adopt a user program
Hello Irondome, I figured out that there was a minor typo in the template you pasted on User:Irondome I have corrected it over here. You can also drop a message to an editor of your choice from the list at Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area/Adopters for this. regards-- D Big X ray  10:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Appreciate that mate. You know, Im thinking its just better to stick with good collaborators like you and a couple of others :) Appreciated! Irondome (talk) 10:18, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Agreed, thats the joy of learning, making few mistakes and learning on your own. I did the same and I was not even aware that there existed something such as the adoption program until few months back. The links on User_talk:Irondome pretty much sums up everything. you can always contact editors who you think might help you, in your quest, there are helpme template, WP:HELPDESK, or WP:IRC as well. -- D Big X ray   10:31, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

I may sometimes hassle you with dumb questions, but I wont be a major pain. I think we will contribute and interact on projects in the future, so that would be cool my friend. Irondome (talk) 10:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * You are always welcome, for that. -- D Big X ray  11:05, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

  D Big X ray  has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Talkback
the wub "?!"  14:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Mrt3366  (Talk?)   07:28, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Also here. Mrt3366   (Talk?)   07:30, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Please take special care of indentation while commenting
See INDENT for more. Mrt3366  (Talk?)   07:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Irondome (talk) 15:47, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!
Most welcome! Irondome (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Tutorial
hi, please see Tutorial/Talk_pages to know how to indent. We feel that leaving a space after newline will indent the line but one needs to use Colon : to create indents. you can check out the full Tutorial its short and good. -- D Big X ray  15:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Irondome (talk) 15:13, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail!
 ≫TheStrike   Σagle≪   15:32, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Anir1uph (talk) 15:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Please Comment
Please comment on this (again). Should you choose to respond to this invitation, your feedback would be valued. Mrt3366  (Talk?)   11:59, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Moved the Comparison table to article space
See Comparison of ICBMs. Thanks for your help. Mrt3366  (Talk?)   07:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to discuss
I have some important things to discuss with you on my talk page. Your feedback would be greatly valued. I think your opinion may come in handy. Mrt3366  (Talk?)   08:52, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Mrt3366  (Talk?)   14:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC) DBigXray is asking someone to clarify "the subject and aim of the discussion". His perspective and experience can help a great deal. Mrt3366  (Talk?)   15:08, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * BTW, I would love to work with you on this. Mrt3366   (Talk?)   14:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I think you got some elucidating to do (since you started the conversation you, IMO, are the best suitable for this).

A cup of tea for you!

 * WP:CVUA sounds interesting! Irondome (talk) 23:30, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

CVUA
Just drop a message at Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy/Enroll and someone will look into it. the editors at CVUA are very supportive and helpful.-- D Big X ray  05:57, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

New changes to National Missile defense
Help me build this page. Mrt3366  (Talk?)   11:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
help me build the page. Mrt3366  (Talk?)   12:19, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Dan653 (talk) 22:24, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

RfA
Hi Irondrome. On the enWiki at least, there's is nothing to stop very new users from voting at RfA. However, it's an important process and some us have been trying hard to reduce the 'dramafest' effect. Please take a moment to learn more about the process, the research that  is required before voting, and above all do understand that not all users may be on  the time zone as you. Thanks, and I support your request for adoption. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to the CVUA!
Hey, Irondome! I'll be your instructor here at the CVUA, and I can't wait to get started. :) First, I've got just a few quick questions - if you'd answer here and then leave me a talkback template when you're done, that'd be great. Again, can't wait!
 * You said "basic tools" in your request for enrollment - are you familiar with WP:Twinkle?


 * Anything else you might like to note?

See, those were short! :)  Theopolisme TALK 11:16, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Theo! No, not familiar with Twinkle. Been active on Wiki about 3 months. Ive got about 30+ pages on my watchlist, primarily on pages where I have had an input. My activity on Wiki varies, real life stuff, but it averages a couple hours a week. It can spike higher than that. Depending on mood n motivation.
 * Still getting to grips with citation and other technicalities, but I combat vandalism when I see it :) Irondome (talk) 21:46, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Fantastic. I think we should start at the beginning (i.e. various policies, etc) - I'll create you a special page for your CVUA studies, which I'll post a link to momentarily. Thanks!  Theopolisme TALK 21:51, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * And here you go! Just click on the link to your Academy page when you go to that page - and yes, that was an oddly formulated sentence. :)  Theopolisme TALK 21:55, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop leaving talkback templates...  Theopolisme TALK 22:26, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Was tooling about with it :/ Irondome (talk) 22:30, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah, no problem. Were you able to view your lesson page and get started?  Theopolisme TALK 22:34, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Just getting into it now, and re-reading the Wiki definitions Irondome (talk) 22:37, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Fantastic! Let me know if you need any clarification on any of them.  Theopolisme TALK 05:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Its actually work! Whats a comfortable time period to get each segment completed for you? Im thinking a response every 4-5 days? I wanna get it right, and theres the real life thing. Irondome (talk) 05:24, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

No hurry, take your time! But if you wouldn't mind dropping a on my talk when you finish, that would be great (to ensure that I don't miss it in my watchlist). Thanks!  Theopolisme TALK 14:43, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Dan653 (talk) 02:23, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Bad side of Wikipedia and why editors retire from wikipedia
Hi Iron I saw your comment on the SPI before it got deleted, Glad to see your concern against my tormentors. This is a bad side of editing at Wikipedia where some users, who have no intention of contributing positively to discussions, jump into it merely for the sake of WP:Trolling , They disrupt the process and enjoy hurling WP:AOBFs against editors with complete disregard to their contributions. ANI is often misused by them and it has earned the name of WP:Drama Stage. Their main intention is to malign editors by any means hook or by crook, you already saw a good example at the false SPI initiated against me. Sadly one has to deal with it. When this crosses the limits of endurance, the editors (and even many admins whom I have seen) are forced to leave due to the poisonous atmosphere created. regards -- D Big X ray  11:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

CVUA :)
Hey, Irondome! Just reaching out - your CVUA page is still looking a bit blank - are you having problems answering the questions or something? Here's a link: User:Theopolisme/CVUA/Irondome. :)  Theo polisme  :) 23:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)  Theo polisme  :) 00:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Adolf Behrman article
I am humbled by the Special Barnstar. Thank you!AuthorAuthor (talk) 00:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Iron Dome
Hey there IronDome,

I noticed you're seeking adoption. I'm not part of the program, but if you'd like, I can still adopt you. -- Activism  1234  23:50, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to the Milhist project
 Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: WPMILHIST Announcements.
 * Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
 * If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
 * If you have an idea for improving the project, we have a strategy think tank that provides a dedicated forum for discussing it.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! AustralianRupert (talk) 23:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:12, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sandwich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:35, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
LittleWink (talk) 19:48, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Arab–Israeli aces
Is there a particular reason why you removed my contribution to the talk page and replaced it with your own? Poliocretes (talk) 19:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * This is the page before your edit and this is the edit itself. If you had only added a support, the history for the talk page would not have marked your edit with a red (-359) article size reduction next to it. I'll restore the removed content, please be more careful. Poliocretes (talk) 20:45, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Thats great. Irondome (talk) 20:55, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fried fish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andalusian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Anti-Israel POV and vandalism
This important information was removed from an article by Pluto2012, despite he is the only one who inserted repeated information about territorial and demographic changes. Perhaps you could restore the missing content and finish this nonsense. Thanks.--201.231.95.189 (talk) 00:04, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Season's tidings!
To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas, Irondome
<div style="-webkit-transform: rotate(.0deg); -moz-transform: rotate(.0deg); -o-transform: rotate(.0deg); transform: rotate(.0deg); position: relative; left: -2em; margin: 0; background-color: #E00000; background-color: rgba(0,0,0, 0.53); background: -moz-radial-gradient(bottom right 90deg, farthest-side, rgba(224,0,0, 0.8), rgba(255,255,0, 0.2)); padding: 0.3em 1em 0.5em; border: 1px solid #999; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -moz-box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); -webkit-box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75); border-radius: 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em; -webkit-border-radius: 1em;"> From Mrt3366: Wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. Mr T (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 21:41, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

creation of groups etc
The Village Pump is a good place to start when unsure of one's route. With regard to the article you hope to create, I see nothing at all wrong with starting in your own userspace as a sub page and working it into at east a decent stub with references before moving t to main namespace. the problem you face is the synthesis of original research unless you are remarkably careful. Never let inexperience stand in your way. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * A further thought is to work with Wikipedia's "death specialists' in the wikiproject whose name I have forgotten but which appears at the head of the Amanda Todd talk page. It seems to me that your concept is a valid yet challenging article to create. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * You might also want to introduce yourself to User:Penbat who is substantially involved in editing articles and areas regarding bullying. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Falklands discussion - Indentation
Hi Irondome, I hope you don't mind but I fixed the indentation of your comments in the talk page since it was a bit messy. If you find it not acceptable that I edit your comments, please feel free to revert my edit. I will be responding your comment over there. Regards. Gaba p (talk) 18:58, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi there
As you're aware, I value your ability to provide a neutral summary of debates in closing RFC. Would you be prepared to look at the RFC currently running at Talk:Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute and consider closing it? I think the debate has run its course. Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 18:53, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your input, sorry you got the treatment you did. Cheers, Wee Curry Monster talk 22:48, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Not helpful
Since you are a relatively new editor (although not more so than myself) with your permission I'll give you some advice: comments like this are not helpful. Sarcasm never aims at bringing the parties involved in a discussion closer together, quite the opposite in fact. I would definitely not recommend following Wee's war-like attitude, it only makes you less likely to be treated with civility down the line. Regards. Gaba p (talk) 22:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Please don't take the above comment as an attack of any kind to you or your edits. I simply wanted to note that sarcasm (or humor that could be interpreted as such) is hardly beneficial in a normal discussion, let alone one as filled with WP:DRAMA as that one. I value your input as a fresh editor and tomorrow (I don't have much time today) I'll present to you, as clearly as possible, my point as to why the reasons for the removal of that section are absurd. Regards and please don't be discouraged to provide your input. Gaba p (talk) 00:20, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thats fineGaba. As I said, on your talkpage, I appreciate the concern and the tone. Irondome (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Much appreciated
Thank you! Yours is my first star ever :) Cheers mate. Gaba p (talk) 15:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Don't be offended
I'm sorry I keep fixing your indentations but I only do it so the flow of the discussion isn't disrupted. Please tell me if you find this not acceptable and I will of course stop doing it. Regards. Gaba p (talk) 22:38, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited K-ration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wrigley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Irondome
Sorry I could not comment for a while but I was blocked for 31 hours for a perceived WP:NPA violation. Look, I know you are a relatively new user and most of these wiki-lawyering concepts might not be familiar to you but I need you to understand something. Right now Wee and Kahastok are claiming they had consensus for deleting the whole section. This is not correct. As you well know, the consensus was to apply my proposed re-factoring of the section. Now, you might wonder "what's the difference? Just draft the new section and apply it, there's no need to restore the old section back". See, this has two problems. First: both Wee and Kahastok are violating the outcome of an RfC and this can not be allowed to happen because it sets a precedent that they can pretty much get away with anything they want. Second: if they are allowed to disregard the consensus reached in the talk page to apply my proposed edit based on the source you brought in among others, they will base all new attempts at introducing the re-factored section on "no consensus" given that the status-quo of the article is to have no section at all. You don't have to take my word for it, in the section you opened Talk:Falkland_Islands_sovereignty_dispute they immediately jumped to oppose the addition of the re-factored section that was agreed during the discussion. They will use the "no consensus" card to prevent the re-factored section to be added with the aim of having no section at all or merely a two line comment saying absolutely nothing of value.

Please do not take any of this as an insult to your intelligence or abilities as a WP editor. I just point these things out because it looks to me that you have had the fortune so far to not encounter editors like Wee in your previous editing in WP and you should be very aware of what they are capable of in terms of manipulation. I know you hold him in a somewhat high esteem but I also know that you will, if not now, in time, see through his actions. Regards and please don't be discouraged to provide your input at the talk page. Gaba p (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2013 (UTC) PS: the issue is now being discussed at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Wee_Curry_Monster_removing_content_from_article_with_no_consensus. ANI].

The Barnstar of Diplomacy
I'd like to second this barnstar. Thank you, Irondome. --Langus (t) 00:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Apologies
I apologize again for my suspicion. It all makes sense now.

Regards. --Langus (t) 00:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Falkland Islands dispute.
I'm assuming here that you've read my reply at ANI. My full closure statement is at Talk:Falkland Islands sovereignty dispute. I'm not sure it's off much use from a learning about dispute resolution point of view apart from an example of how not to do it. I don't close many discussions although when they're often the more contentious ones so I do have some experience with more heated discussions. In this instance I point out the problems as I saw them (without naming names) and tried to make it clear that one "side" wasn't the winner and that I hoped that a compromise could be reached as it looked like good progress was being made. This last bit was an effort at trying to keep all sides happy while also being the truth. The reason I closed the RfC rather than just let it run and see what compromise might be reached in the meantime was two fold. Firstly I did not think it would be helpful for people, especially those involved, to be saying there was a consensus there and secondly I did not think it would be fair on other editors finding the RfC (via for example the RfC listings) to comment in a process that I thought had clearly already failed. I note that a lot of good work has gone on towards a compromise in the last few hours although there are obviously still differences. At the very least this should make any future RfC be able to be more focused on specific issues and offer specific ideas although I remain hopeful that this won't be necessary and a compromise will be reached without the need for another RfC. Dpmuk (talk) 07:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

PC-100
Generally, it was a failure. It took some time, before the production could start, and then it was quickly wiped off by RPG-2. If you're interested, I can send you a scan of a source article, with photos of surviving exhibit (if you write me your mail or send me a message). Pibwl &larr;&laquo; 23:19, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Minor edits
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --John (talk) 06:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I appreciate the clear definition given Irondome (talk) 06:44, 5 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Not at all, my pleasure. --John (talk) 06:45, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

RPA
That edit you reverted as a "personal attack" was actually just a comment that contained no personal attack. Certainly not on you, and not one you are entitled to revert. Please do not refactor the comments of others unless there is a clear personal attack. Thanks :> Doc   talk  08:09, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Didn't take long
And we're at an impasse again, with Gaba p refusing to give ground or compromise and insisting on more and more weight to his edit. RFC?

Do you still have an appetite for starting a neutral RFC? Wee Curry Monster talk 16:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Wee, coming over to the talk page of an editor making several accusations against me and then ask him to open a neutral RfC is a bit of a contradiction, wouldn't you say? Want to try a bit longer to get a consensus version before opening another RfC? I'm willing to compromise, you just need to present sources, that's it. I mean this is WP: "no sources" = "no mention", right? Regards. Gaba p (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Your white helmet routine may be required again. As one of my section leaders once said "blessed are the peace keepers, for they are shot at by both sides". Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 01:46, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Centurion tank, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ( Hohum  @ ) 22:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * See "Wholesale massacre at Centurion article" on user talk page for my response and counterargument in this case. Irondome (talk) 23:35, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Iron Dome
Thanks for your input on the talk page for the eponymous missile system. I'm sure we're getting somewhere! Sweet dreams... 201.230.175.86 (talk) 01:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: North Korea crisis (2013)
Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this.

You are receiving this as you have recently reverted a user removing interwiki links.

Removal of interwiki links on a page linked to a wikidata item that contains the links is NOT vandalism. Please use this script which can identify if the links are found on wikidata.

If you have any questions regarding wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata. 86.45.216.32 (talk) 03:24, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

History of breakfast
A stub article has been created. Cheers, Northamerica1000(talk) 13:07, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Highbeam
Hi, and thanks for your offer. The article is in sandbox now. I can email you with more details if you wish.User:Canoe1967|Canoe1967]] (talk) 22:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC) --Canoe1967 (talk) 22:56, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dieppe Raid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:50, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:51, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:57, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Jewish culture
Careful with reverting vandalism, you actually put it back in! I recommend using Twinkle until obtaining rollback rights, if you wish. Cheers &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 16:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:18, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for the rollback
It happens sometimes. When my browser loads my watchlist, it does a sudden jump down a line or two. If an entry is very long, it wraps and the "rollback" option sits among the left side. Just as I click a "diff" on an item, the page jumps and I accidentally click "rollback" on another item. It happens every month or so. A thousand pardons. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

By the way, it happens so often that the above is a boilerplate post. :) I will actually save it to my toolbox for further use. Again, so sorry. The RfA page keeps floating to the top of my watchlist, so that is why. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:14, 21 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Anna, I had not even noticed. :) Cheers! Irondome (talk) 00:17, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Deputy leaders of the thirty-third Israeli government
Could you help me with this? I don't know who are the current Head of the Government Deputies.--Michael Zeev (talk) 03:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Michael. I am not sure I am the right one to help on this subject, as I am weak on Israeli Politics. Suggest you visit one of the relevant subjects talk pages, and find someone clued up. Thats usually a good place to find contributors, and subject specialists. Cheers mate. Irondome (talk) 16:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:21, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Josef Goebbels
Can you read what I wrote at his talk page? Thank you.Mistico (talk) 20:22, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited LITENING targeting pod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:19, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Panzerfaust
fair enough, though I'd still like to note that the original, german-made weapons remained in service in various countries at least into 1950s, but I guess the current version is good enough. Ape89 (talk) 20:06, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Six-Day War
When you gave the opportunity, please explain the rationale for your recent edits to this page on the articles talk page. I find your edit summaries to be incoherent. In the first one you say "let the source do the talking", then you repeat the exact same edit with the summary: "patently POV choice of "sources"". What is your claimed justification for the edit, accurate representation of the source or source selection? In any case it looks like a clearly non-neutral edit as you removed information cited to an academic source without reasonable explanation. Further if someone reverts your edit, the next step is to go to the talk page to discuss the edit not edit war the content. Dlv999 (talk) 02:45, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Spam
While it's great to add actual historical information to the article - the addition of the claimed date is being "supported" by a 100% irrelevant source. It contains zero information about Spam - none, zilch, nothing. Given the inappropriate addition of a fake ref, it's hard to accept the date provided by that same editor as anything even remotely reliable. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The date and the fake ref were initially added by, which I reverted, he restored, and I reverted again ... you then restored his date and the fake ref, then added a citation needed after it. The problem, as I stated above, is that the questioned date was added by the same person as the fake ref.  As such, it's hard to place any credence in the supposed date - it looks more like a hook to justify the fake ref addition.  Until a real source can be found, the date shouldn't be restored, as it appears to be completely bogus at this point. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:00, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * There is actually a good piece of research on the excellent Food Timeline website that comfirms the 37 date and a brief history of its naming and esarly years up to 45. I might add it, providing you think Food timeline is a reliable source. Irondome (talk) 03:04, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not familiar with Food Timeline, but if you have a good ref, it would be useful to have an actual date in the article. If you're concerned about the reliability of the source, it can always be posted to the talk page first for discussion by everyone who has the page on their watchlist (or it could be discussed at WP:ELN, but I usually think the article talk pages are a better first location). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 00:18, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Future Korean War
Hi, you participated in the first deletion discussion for this article; it's up for deletion again at Articles for deletion/Future Korean War (2nd nomination). If you'd like to comment again, feel free. Thanks, Ansh666 03:49, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Dolphin-class submarine I would suggest "subclasses" D1 & 2
moved from User talk:79.176.149.254


 * Hi. Been working on the Dolphin article for a while now. I would agree that there are 2 seperate subclasses with regard to these boats. However I don't know if there are totally different apart from the AIP stowage. It is quite possible that the D1 "class" will be converted to AIP capability. It would appear to be a straightforward dockyard procedure. Saw a tantalising ref to this in as I recall,The Speigel. I think it is very plausable. Will try to grab any sources floating this.


 * Notice that the D1 subclass is still longer and heavier that the AIP-equipped Type 212. This would indicate unknown capabilities.
 * Also, I would suggest sub class classificaton. Even without AIP the D1 appears to be very close to the type 212. I would suggest the D1 subtype is more sophisticated than German export subs to other nations. Cheers. Irondome (talk) 02:52, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I mulled the sub-class language too, you edits seem just right. I have also been working on the page for a few years(been editing wikipedia as IP too long now to want a brand new account) and appreciate your good work. 79.176.149.254 (talk) 19:42, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Talk page archiving
Saw your question at Anna's talk page, you may want to have a look at Help:Archiving a talk page. Basically you can either copy/paste it to a subpage of your talk page manually (i.e. User talk:Irondome/Archive 1), or you can setup Autoarchiving that will be done by a bot. Anna does it manually, I use a bot. You can have a look at the code on my talk page for the settings for MiszaBot III, but it's all listed at the help page I listed above. --kelapstick(bainuu) 22:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Cheers mate. Appreciated! Irondome (talk) 22:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 09:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Rationing link

 * Sorry about the confusion; but a link vegetables looks like merely a link to an article which says what vegetables are. The words "digging for victory" should show. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:57, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * it is ok. I have made a slight word change, maybe superfluous, but attempts to explain motivational as opposed to propaganda. Cheers Irondome (talk) 05:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 18:25, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:57, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:10, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 04:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 August 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 01:48, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Whisperback
22:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Whisperback
21:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 August 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 11:56, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:34, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Re: Talk:Aspies ... update

 * I am not an expert in the intricacies of the language, I'm afraid. It is not my subject. You need to find someone like Mishae to help, I htink. Fiddle   Faddle  17:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Aspects of the above seem to be covered in Sociological and cultural aspects of autism. Cheers! Irondome (talk) 17:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * please look at Irondome's message and the article linked to. Fiddle   Faddle  17:33, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

In that case undelete Aspies and Talk:Aspies temporarily and move content in full to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sociological_and_cultural_aspects_of_autism, and then we can relink the from Aspies to Sociological and cultural aspects of autism and then redirect Talk:Aspies to Talk:Sociological_and_cultural_aspects_of_autism, and I can get everyone else to work on merging Aspies and Talk: Aspies into that document?

Is this possible solution to your problems? Please have my userpage undeleted, then we can get to work? AspieNo1 (talk) 18:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC) AspieNo1 (talk) 18:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 August 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:41, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

IAI Kfir
Please take the time to read the following explaination. The hotlinking of the publisher name is NOT the url to the cite, that citation is a non-linked cite. The linking of publisher names to the relevant Wikipedia article is standard convention, as you can see on many, many articles here (if you wish for examples, I can give one). The hotlinked publisher name is NOT a link to the source, there is no URL/hotlinking present to the source, which is also acceptable practice. Please familiarize yourself with these common conventions. For greater detail, see the following discussion at: Talk:IAI_Kfir, perhaps double-checking the situation and explanation before reverting in under a minute's time would have been a useful exercise as well. Kyteto (talk) 22:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I have respect for you as an editor of knowledge and integrity, whom I have often seen and I have briefly interacted with you on a couple of occasions. I understand your outlining of WP policy. But, this is a rather lazy and sloppy cite. I would expect, as I have said at least a link to the LA times archive. That would have satisfied me. A link to our own article I think is sub-standard. If there was a further link then I apologise for missing it. Irondome (talk) 22:19, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Whisperback
02:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

reply
EyeTruth, I would like to see a version of V1 incorporating my proposed extra sentence (see hatted V1 comments for detail.) I believe it adds to it, and leads more logically to the debate on blitzkrieg linked in the notes. Cheers! Irondome (talk) 23:07, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


 * (So do you want the convo to continue where you posted it? It could become long and get in the way there. Or you could move it all into the comment. I'm not sure what you prefer. For now, I will replicate and continue it here) Nvm, GDB prefers discussion to takeover the voting. I've moved my comment to the page. EyeTruth (talk) 18:24, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 August 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 16:06, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Iran-Iraq War
Thanks for advice. To be honest, I stronly despise any media as source, regardless is it New York Times, BBC, Jerusalem Post, PressTV, RT, etc. Especially when it comes about political conflicts. If I'm in charge about source policy, I would ban absolutely everything except books produced by academic publishers. Regarding Iranian history, personally I prefer British and American sources ("enemy" countries) from Cambridge University or Columbia University. Nationality of scholars isn't important, for example book about Bahai persecution in Iran by Israeli scholar Soli Shahvar is available in any Iranian university, I've read it at UT. If you rely on media too much, even that situation would be "impossible". Cheers! :) --HistorNE (talk) 20:57, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks my friend. I agree, most media is biased, the world over. Russia Today is pissing me off at the moment especially. I think source critria should be tightened up. There is much nonsense masquerading as RS propping up WP articles even as we speak. At least here on WP intellectuals from all over can communicate and work together. That gives me hope. The quality of the planets leadership is deteriorating, not the people. Cheers my friend! Irondome (talk) 21:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, I won't go into stories like "Zionist-owned" or "governmental propaganda" media, just ask yourself - would any serious scholar work as journalist? Highly unlikely. Employees of all mentioned media are just bunch of mediocrities. Unfortunately, when it comes about current crisis like Syrian civil war, you have no alternative but to use media sources. Few weeks ago I spoke with one US-based friend about mentioned books and he wasn't so confidential about my statements, so I took some photos from National library of Iran: Why I Am Not a Muslim by Ibn Warraq (calling islam as fascist in intro, insulting Khomeini), Winds of Change: The Future of Democracy in Iran by Reza Pahlavi , Reading Lolita in Tehran by Azar Nafisi , various criticism about Islam/Iran from Western authors , Bahai literature , etc. Although it would be "logical" such books are banned, thanks God Tehran is not Riyadh. There's one Iranian poverb which says A wise enemy is better than a foolish friend, so I guess it's only reason why Iranian government chosed USA/UK/Israel as enemies instead of KSA as friend. --HistorNE (talk) 23:53, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Utterly fascinating. It is the position of supreme leader which is the major problem for Iranian popular will to be expressed. It does not surprise that in such an ancient civilised country, such things would be, in terms of continuing intellectual (relative?) freedom of sources. Saudi Arabia with North korea is arguably the most repressive regimes in the world today. But you are not the Saudis. Your previous President was like G.W.Bush. A strange mirror -image, in terms of approach. They even looked the same in some pics {or maybe it was me} both disasters. The new president seems more measured in tone. Iran and Israel should begin unofficial talks in terms of normalisation. This period is deeply unnatural for the Iranian people, never have they shown any anti-semitic feeling. I worry about the term "Zionist" as a new respectable academic/ideological cover for what is the old devil, New antisemitism. Persia, Iran and the Jewish people have always been great friends. This is a strange historical aberration. That is the major external issue facing Iran today. I think Israel has the largest ex-patriot community of Iranians relative to population in the world. And not all are Jewish Iranian. Deeply fascinating exchange my friend. Don't worry, I am not expecting a reply on such sensitive matters. Cheers! Irondome (talk) 01:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Whisperback
08:30, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm EuroCarGT. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Burning shoe leather, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. ///Euro Car GT  00:45, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Minority rights violations in Kosovo
A while ago, in Articles for deletion/Persecution of Serbs and other non-Albanians in Kosovo, you said the subject had potential under a different title, but didn't address the issue of improper synthesis. Would you be interested in working on that subject in a less contentious scope? I noticed we don't have a human rights in Kosovo article yet, and a lot of that content sounds like it might fit there. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 10:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Joy. I would like to help, but time may be an issue at the moment, and indeed I am not totally confident in my expertise. I have some knowledge. I would be glad to help in any capacity that I would be helpful in. Cheers! Irondome (talk) 01:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
///Euro Car GT  01:15, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
///Euro Car GT  01:25, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
///Euro Car GT  01:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
///Euro Car GT  02:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)