User talk:Simon Aronsson

Your submission at Articles for creation: K6 (April 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:K6 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:K6, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:K6 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:K6 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 14:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:K6 has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:K6. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Just so I got this right, Theroadislong: Should I interpret that as physical books being the only source you accept? I've included a published scientific report where k6 is part of the method used, but that does not seem to cut it. I'm sorry if I come across as rude, I'm just a bit frustrated that I don't understand what you are looking for. :) Simon Aronsson (talk) 15:49, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * See reliable sources for help with determining what is suitable, sources can be on line or print, but blogs are rarely considered reliable. Theroadislong (talk) 15:52, 15 April 2020 (UTC)


 * And regarding the scientific report? Simon Aronsson (talk) 15:53, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Note for misplaced COI declaration
Hello, Simon Aronsson. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. I appreciate that you tried to declare a conflict of interest (COI) at Draft:K6_(software), but it is the wrong page to do so. You can disclose a COI on your user page, as I have helped you do so. You might want to read the guidelines of dealing with, and disclosing, a COI. Thanks for your editing, and we wish that you'd like to stay! Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 07:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)