User talk:Simona Mantar

March 2021
Hello, I'm Huggums537. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Petrich have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.   Huggums537 (talk) 20:11, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Petrich. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Petrich was changed by Simona Mantar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884809 on 2021-03-24T20:14:12+00:00

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Petrich. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 20:20, 24 March 2021 (UTC) , pardon the intrusion here, but I thought blocks were supposed to escalate. Especially for an offender with a clean block history who might not have been around long enough to realize they may be permanently blocked or even banned. Perhaps you would consider reducing the block to a timed duration? It would save the community time and effort in future unblock requests, as well as that of the blocked user. Huggums537 (talk) 21:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , This is standard practice across Wikipedia and between admins. See Vandalism-only account which, although not a policy or guideline, describes an almost universal practice. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 21:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for the essay. That explains a lot. I guess this user will have to make a request if they ever decide to come back. Huggums537 (talk) 21:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)