User talk:Simoncellery

June 2016
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your new username is fine, so I've done the rename. In order to be unblocked, please answer the following questions: You were blocked partly because your username appeared directly related to a subject that you are trying to create an article about, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to break the 3 important principles above. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
 * Do you understand conflict of interest?
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be considered to be notable?

Comment
Boing! said Zebedee, I note that you have overturned above a decision made by admin JamesBWatson. It is clear advice that you don't overturn another admin's decision without discussion, as per wheel war policy. AS far as I can see, you haven't consulted James, you certainly haven't consulted me, and you have unblocked without the user addressing James's issues, or even those raised by yourself. To make sure the editor understands, I am stating now that if he comes anywhere near the company topic, I will indef again, whatever user name he uses Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:11, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I haven't unblocked him - check his block log. And if you check the history, you'll see my comment and rename were first and JamesBWatson declined the unblock later, so I haven't overturned anything there either. (I did make a mistake in not spotting the request was made by an IP and I shouldn't have done the rename, but that's something else). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * , my apologies, I saw the rename and read too much into it, I thought it seemed out of character (whereas my impetuosity perhaps isn't...) Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:48, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * No worries ;-). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:52, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Editing
So what did I edit that wasn't correct? What is the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simoncellery (talk • contribs) 04:04, 16 June 2016‎
 * If you answer my questions, above, that should hopefully give you some idea of what was wrong with your writing about White Rabbit Graphic Design. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for clarifying :) Yes, I understand now. There are obviously lots of wikipedia pages about various companies though. How is it that they're allowed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.62.16.62 (talk) 10:23, 16 June 2016 (UTC)