User talk:Simoncia~enwiki

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 00:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, Simoncia. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fabrizio "Simoncia" Simoncioni, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. SarahStierch (talk) 00:52, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Circumvention of process
Please do not try to circumvent the process. Your article was declined at WP:AFC, using WP:RM to try to circumvent that is gaming the system and can be considered disruptive editing. -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 12:20, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

I was not trying to circumvent the process at all. I just wanted to change the uncorrect name of my articles, thats it. I apologies. I didn't knew it was necessary to be published before ask for a title change. Simoncia (talk) 20:41, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bjelleklang -  talk 20:15, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Having recorded a number of albums doesn't make one notable, and the BLP policy requires everything to be attributed to a reliable source. The Latin Grammies site is reliable of course, but it doesn't cover anything in the article besides him having worked on a song that's been nominated. Bjelleklang -  talk 19:32, 1 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I am here just to understand, again, sorry.. You wrote "not notable" because recording, mixing and producing records (with more then 48 certified platinum awarded) and a latin grammy nomination for Best Album of The Year (his name APPEARS on the nominee list n the official grammy site, not just the record he did) is not enough for wiki standard. So why collegue as Joe Chiccarelli, Tom Lord Alge, Stephen Short, Andy Wallace, Michael Brauer, Tchad Blake, Chris Coady, John Congleton, Jason Suecof (just to mention a fews, but on wikipedia you can find thousand of them) are approved? And also why wikipedia in Italian and Spanish has approved the article since years with no problems, considering Simoncioni notable? Maybe he could be not notable for you but he for sure is for music related people and artists. Or maybe he is just not notable for the english version of wikipedia. If this is the reason, I can understand, otherwise, sorry, it looks little strange. Also because Simoncioni not only is a worldwide renowed mixer and producer, but also a live musician and former artist with references. He toured in Ligabue's band from 1998 to 2005 in Italy and Europe (including in many TV shows as the MTV music award (refs included). He also appeared on many official artists biography such as Litfiba "PROIBITO" official bio (ISBN 88-85859-96-8) and Ligabue "1190-2004 bio" (ISBN 88-359-5572-6) and LIGABUE SAN SIRO & OLIMPICO photo book (ISBN 88-900976-0-4). All the records listed are on the market so don't need references. I will not insist anymore after this, but I invite you to think about it and revise your judgment upon the article. Thank you.Simoncia (talk) 11:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC) I also added few more references including official video clips from Warner Music where Simoncioni appear as performer.Simoncia (talk) 12:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The reason for why I rejected the article was a lack of reliable sources covering the information contained in the article. Lets take a look at the sources you had in the article when I reviewed it:
 * Italo-interviews: Interview only, usually regarded as a primary source. Doesn't make him notable, not sure if the source is considered reliable enough to be used as it says itself, "Then followed other great artists and with all of them you can read what they said to me and what are they think about our beloved music." This indicates to me that he might be biased towards artists or genres, but I'll leave that for others to decide.
 * LIGABUE L'ODORE DEL SESSO LIVE, music video from MTV Europe Music Awards. Video only confirms that he played there, doesn't really verify any of the other information in the article.
 * Billboard chart: Confirms that a song he mixed reached a fourth place. Doesn't verify any of the other information, doesn't make in notable.
 * latingrammy.com: As I've said before, it confirms that he was one of six engineers/mixers of a nominated song, but nothing else. Doesn't make him notable, doesn't verify any of the information in the article.
 * Eluniversal: Read via Google Translate; confirms that a band he has worked with at least once was the most played band in Spain(?) in 2012. Doesn't make him notable, doesn't verify any of the other information in the article.
 * afi.mi.it: Not sure of the intention of this link. The link itself doesn't verify any information or establish any notability.
 * Allmusic credits: Confirms that he has worked as an engineer or a mixer on two albums. Doesn't verify any of the other information in the article. Doesn't establish notability.
 * Just to take the external links too:
 * Tuttoliga.com: Also via Google Translate; Mentions a few albums and a job position, also mentions that he joined the band Ligabue which apparently had several platinum albums from what I can make of the translation. Doesn't make him notable, although the band might be notable if it can be verified through other sources.
 * Pianetarock: Also via Google Translate; mentions him as part of an album review. Although the translation isn't very good, I doubt that it verifies any of the information in this article except for anything related to this album. Probably doesn't establish notability.
 * Presspool.it: Appear to be a nonexisting page which is redirected to the frontpage of Presspool.
 * Discogs is dead and returns a 404 error.
 * The two Sound&Lite articles appears to be written by him, and as such is regarded as self-published. Such sources doesn't count for notability and can only be used as a source for some information directly relating to the subject.
 * All in all, most of the article doesn't appear to be covered by sources, and as there are no specific notability guidelines for sound techs, he must pass the general notability guideline as an engineer, or WP:BAND and WP:GNG as a musician.


 * That being said, when I look at the article now, the additions are mostly allmusic of the same type as above, a bunch of youtube videos (which are rarely considered as reliable sources or useful for establishing notability) and some book references. The books are probably the best sources here. I usually don't do multiple reviews of the same article; he might be notable for his work but in my opinion you need to tighten up the article and remove any content not directly attributable to a source. Remove most of the discography, keep only the most important releases and incorporate it into his biography instead. I hope this helped make things a bit clearer. Bjelleklang -  talk 13:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fabrizio "Simoncia" Simoncioni concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fabrizio "Simoncia" Simoncioni, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fabrizio "Simoncia" Simoncioni


Hello Simoncia. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Fabrizio "Simoncia" Simoncioni".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Simoncia. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Simoncia~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:44, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)