User talk:Simongraham

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (NBMR-1) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating NBMR-1, Simongraham!

Wikipedia editor Garagepunk66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I enjoyed reading your article about the NBMR-1. Very well done."

To reply, leave a comment on Garagepunk66's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ways to improve Yotchiangrai
Hi, I'm Robvanvee. Simongraham, thanks for creating Yotchiangrai!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article needs additional references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.  Rob van  vee  18:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Parentheses in biological authorities
Hi, the presence or absence of parentheses in biological authorities is meaningful; the parentheses around the author citation indicate that this was not the original taxonomic placement (as explained at Author citation (zoology)). So the parentheses need to be left precisely as they are in the source. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Authority links for spiders
Thanks for adding the link to Wanda Wesołowska to some spider articles. If you do find authors for spider taxa not linked, you can check WikiProject Spiders/List of Arachnologists, and do please add a name if it's not already there.

Personally, I see no reason not to spell Polish names correctly, so I would change "Wesolowska" to "Wesołowska". Peter coxhead (talk) 11:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Please consider applying for Autopatrolled
Hi, I've just patrolled an article you created. I only felt the need to add, a link to the relevant project on the talk page. Having had a look through some of your previous created articles it seems to me that you should apply for the Autopatrolled permission. It would help reduce the backlog at New Page Patrol if articles as good as the ones you've been creating weren't on the list. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 09:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Ha, no need to apply, I just gave it to you. Cheers!-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  01:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brancus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Bedford S type
 * added a link pointing to Leyland


 * Muhammad Shah III Lashkari
 * added a link pointing to Orissa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Polish arachnologists
Hi, I don't know if you are interested in creating articles on any of the other Polish arachnologists listed here, other than Wanda Wesołowska. I've just created a short article on Marek Żabka and am working on a draft for Joanna Gardzińska. One issue I've come across is that many Polish arachnologists have been involved with the Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, but this institution has had different names at different times (see Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach). So I thought you might perhaps be interested in knowing this. I made a fix at Wanda Wesołowska based on one of these name changes. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Wyższa Szkoła Nauczycielska (1969–1974)
 * Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna (1974–1977)
 * Wyższa Szkoła Rolniczo-Pedagogiczna (1977–1999)
 * Akademia Podlaska (1999–2010)
 * Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny (from 2010)

Thank you for this, Peter. I have made start on an article on Barbara Maria Patoleta, who was supervised by Żabka and published with Gardzińska, based on the link. Please feel free to add to that too. Simongraham (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Great. I added Patoleta to WikiProject Spiders/List of Arachnologists; this is useful as a source of wikitext for links. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbara Maria Patoleta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMS Satyr (1916), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devonport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Dashes
Hi, MOS:DASHES requires either spaced en-dashes or unspaced em-dashes. One of the many Wikipedia style rules for new editors to learn! In taxon lists, spaced en-dash is normally used for information after the taxon and author. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you. There seems to be a lot of inconsistency as some entries have hyphens, some en-dash and some em-dash across the different lists. I was attempting to introduce some consistency in the section but maybe there is a bigger edit available. Simongraham (talk) 19:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes, there's a lot of inconsistency over dashes in many articles, not just spiders. It doesn't help that the differences don't show up clearly in some fonts. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 01:48, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Encyclopedia of Popular Music of the World
Dear Simongraham, do you own the book Bloomsbury Encyclopedia of Popular Music of the World, Volume 9, accidentally? I'm asking you because you corrected a formatting, using detailed info on the book. I'm particularly looking for its entry on Rapso. Kind regards, Grueslayer 09:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of ship launches in 1917, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pembroke ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_ship_launches_in_1917 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_ship_launches_in_1917?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

List of most successful American submarines in World War II
Were the United States's submarines only active on the pacific front? Eddie891 Talk Work 20:01, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

According to DANFS, there were some active in the Atlantic and Mediterranean including USS Blackfish, which sank the German Patrol Boat No. 408, and USS Herring, which sank the Ville du Havre, both as part of Operation Torch. Neither campaigns seem to be have been as important as the Pacific. Simongraham (talk) 10:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject Military History
 Hello,, you are hereby invited to join the Military history WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, theory, and practice. You can add your name to the list of members, browse our showcase, train at the Academy, weigh in at current discussions, assess and review articles, read the news, or find an open task. If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please add your username here. We hope you will join us! Kges1901 (talk) 23:05, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Engine articles
Great articles Simon. To make things easier for you and to help standardise aviation articles, you might like to use Template:WPAVIATION creator, it makes things so much easier, I personally use the cite tools on the toolbar for applying references, again it is so easy, especially if you have URLs or ISBN numbers.--Petebutt (talk) 08:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Angelika Machinek
Could explain why she meets WP:GNG or WP:BIO, or some other related notability guideline? I just don't see it. Please ping me (by entering or  if you reply on this page.  You're on my watchlist, but perhaps not on a short-watchlist.)  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 04:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Arthur. Thank you for your interest. In terms of the WP:GNG criteria:
 * "Significant coverage" Dr Machinek is mentioned in multiple articles, both during her life and subsequently. The article references a biography and the popular press (in German).
 * "Reliable" The article includes references to articles in mainstream newspapers and the FAI website.
 * "Sources" The sources are all independent, with biographical detail confirmed from multiple sources. The literature is in German as there is a paucity of literature in English on German women's gliding (WP:NONENG).
 * "Independent of the subject" The article lists some of her publications but these are not used as source material. The Fund set up as a legacy to her was created after her death.
 * "Presumed" She is listed in multiple WikiProject Women in Red categories and has a German wikipedia article, which demonstrates wider interest.

In terms of the WP:BIO criteria: "A sportsperson is presumed to be notable if the person has actively participated in a major amateur or professional competition or won a significant honor and so is likely to have received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." There are currently no specific criteria for gliding.
 * Dr Machinek is a five times national champion and has held nine world records. She won multiple inaugural races and has received an award from the international body that governs her sport. A fund was set up in her name as a legacy to support the future development of the sport. The article references the popular press and a biography, as well as the governing body.

Simongraham (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The German Wikipedia article isn't linked. Could you give me a pointer?  Never mind, I fixed it.  The "other Wikipedias" section is now populated by Wikidata, so I fixed it.
 * At first glance, I can't determine whether gliding is a serious sport. Could you point me to some material (in the English language, preferably, although I probably qualify as reading level de-1.)  See also quidditch, which is a real sport with an international governing board, but I don't believe we accept being a world-record-holder in that sport meets WP:NSPORT.  My apologies if this should be obvious.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 06:48, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline and the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

HMS Rowena (1916)
You added short references to Johnston 2009 and Colledge & Warlow 2010, those don't match the associated long reference. Could you verify if the years are correct please? Also, you should install User:Svick/HarvErrors.js to get noticed of such issues in articles when making use of short footnotes. If you don't know how to install that, let me know, I'll walk you through it. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Same for HMS Restless (1916) and possibly others. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)


 * BTW, you don't need to add harv anymore. This works just fine now. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Here's another case where having Svick's script installed would have come in handy:. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Article checklists
Hi there,

As you may have gathered :), nearly everything in Wikipedia is negotiable - that includes what is, and what is not, required for B or even A class. Regardless of what other editors (me included) claim.

I write articles for users, so I try to keep them simple, provide graphics etc. I'm always trying to answer 'Why is this interesting to others?' That doesn't make me right - you have to find that balance for yourself.

One other thing; there's tons of information on the web, if you're curious enough. This article, for example, is one I did on Luis de Lacy; if you look at the Sources provided, all of those I found on the web. That's true of all my other articles.

Always happy to help if needed. Robinvp11 (talk) 18:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mendoza dersuuzalai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mendoza ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mendoza_dersuuzalai check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mendoza_dersuuzalai?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Oscar II
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Oscar II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:00, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Oscar II
The article HSwMS Oscar II you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Oscar II for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:21, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Congrats on your first GA. Once you get the hang of it, it will be a much less painful process! May it be the first of many! Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of HSwMS Oscar II
Hello! Your submission of HSwMS Oscar II at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Constantine  ✍  16:01, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Laurel (1913)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Laurel (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Laurel (1913)
The article HMS Laurel (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Laurel (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Parsecboy -- Parsecboy (talk) 10:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Liberty (1913)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Liberty (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Liberty (1913)
The article HMS Liberty (1913) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Liberty (1913) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Liberty (1913)
The article HMS Liberty (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Liberty (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 22:21, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Japanese submarine I-5
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Japanese submarine I-5 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * There's a serious problem with the sourcing of the article; explanation on the review page.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:31, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for HSwMS Oscar II
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Japanese submarine I-5
The article Japanese submarine I-5 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Japanese submarine I-5 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:41, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Milk chocolate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cocoa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Congrats!
G'day Simongraham, congrats on your first Milhist A-Class article. Essentially this means the article is quite to close to FA, and with some additional detail from sources mentioned by other reviewers, I suspect it would be a successful FAC nom. Good luck with it if that is what you decide to do. I will look out for it. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Linnet (1913)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Linnet (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 03:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Linnet (1913)
The article HMS Linnet (1913) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Linnet (1913) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 21:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Linnet (1913)
The article HMS Linnet (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Linnet (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 01:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of AN/APS-20
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article AN/APS-20 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:43, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Italian nuclear weapons program
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian nuclear weapons program you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:02, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Italian nuclear weapons program
The article Italian nuclear weapons program you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian nuclear weapons program for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Lysander (1913)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Lysander (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 18:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Lysander (1913)
The article HMS Lysander (1913) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Lysander (1913) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 20:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Lysander (1913)
The article HMS Lysander (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Lysander (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of AN/APS-20
The article AN/APS-20 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:AN/APS-20 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Lysander (1913), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devonport.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Milk chocolate
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Milk chocolate you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Milk chocolate
The article Milk chocolate you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Milk chocolate for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Bditelnyy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Bditelnyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 23:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Bditelnyy
The article Soviet frigate Bditelnyy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Soviet frigate Bditelnyy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 19:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Bditelnyy
The article Soviet frigate Bditelnyy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Bditelnyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Milk chocolate
The article Milk chocolate you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Milk chocolate for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 12:21, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of AN/APS-20
The article AN/APS-20 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:AN/APS-20 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov
The article Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov
The article Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet cruiser Admiral Isachenkov for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:41, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Project Spaceflight!
If working on those tempts you to join us working on 1960s space probes, I've got plenty of fun projects and cool people to introduce you to... ;) --Neopeius (talk) 15:19, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SOGIN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Casaccia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

User Page idea
I notice you have several GAs. Why not use this template I added to your User Page for all your GAs as I have on my user page and make several top green icons        on your user page as a start.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I've added another top green icon to your User Page so you can get an idea how to do this. I recommend continuing and adding all your Good Articles now as top green icons. See my User Page as an example. Have fun.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Setter (1916)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Setter (1916) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Setter (1916)
The article HMS Setter (1916) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Setter (1916) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 02:41, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Setter (1916)
The article HMS Setter (1916) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Setter (1916) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 05:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Zadornyy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Zadornyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Constance Georgina Adams
Hi. I was hoping you might name some plants she collected, particularly if they were type specimens. If they were type specimens, than someone may have named a plant for her. I don't have access to the books you used for your article, so I was hoping you might put in some additions....MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I have also put her profile into Bionomia which is website where people attribute particular specimens to particular collectors. That is a hard task. But perhaps someone from one of the herbaria in which her specimens reside, may be interested? MargaretRDonald (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Llewellyn (1913)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Llewellyn (1913) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 09:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Zadornyy
The article Soviet frigate Zadornyy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Zadornyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Llewellyn (1913)
The article HMS Llewellyn (1913) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Llewellyn (1913) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Razumnyy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Razumnyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SOGIN
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SOGIN you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 20:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Razumnyy
The article Soviet frigate Razumnyy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Razumnyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:41, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Soviet frigate Zadornyy
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Svirepyy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Svirepyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of SOGIN
The article SOGIN you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SOGIN for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 10:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Svirepyy
The article Soviet frigate Svirepyy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Svirepyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Piaggio Stella P.IX
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Piaggio Stella P.IX you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Piaggio Stella P.IX
The article Piaggio Stella P.IX you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Piaggio Stella P.IX for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Some Dude From North Carolina -- Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Review
Just wanted to say thanks for tackling Talk:Đakovo internment camp/GA1. If you have any suggestions for further improvement, I'd be happy to take them on. Best, Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 19:08, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leyland Landtrain
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leyland Landtrain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 12:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leyland Landtrain
The article Leyland Landtrain you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Leyland Landtrain for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 03:22, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA review of Hamilton, Baltimore
Hello again. I'm sure I said this several times already, but I really appreciate your improvements to Hamilton, Baltimore. I wish I could send you a tip or something to repay you but I know that wouldn't be in the spirit of Wikipedia. :) Anyway, thanks for your time and effort. —Monarchjogs (talk) 01:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Savage (G20)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Savage (G20) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 21:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Savage (G20)
The article HMS Savage (G20) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Savage (G20) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Savage (G20)
The article HMS Savage (G20) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Savage (G20) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carel Victor Gerritsen
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carel Victor Gerritsen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carel Victor Gerritsen
The article Carel Victor Gerritsen you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Carel Victor Gerritsen for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carel Victor Gerritsen
The article Carel Victor Gerritsen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Carel Victor Gerritsen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for HMS Obdurate (1916)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Ladjane Bandeira moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ladjane Bandeira, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Agnihothri Sharath (talk) 01:07, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Ladjane Bandeira moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ladjane Bandeira, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Agnihothri Sharath (talk) 04:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ladjane Bandeira has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ladjane Bandeira. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:28, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Razyashchiy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Razyashchiy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:01, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Razyashchiy
The article Soviet frigate Razyashchiy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Razyashchiy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

December reviews
It seems like your GAN for Urabe is listed for about a month and I have listed a GAN for Audrey Hepburn at the end of November. If you could do the review for the Audrey Hepburn article then I could offer to do the review for your nomination to try to move the articles forward. What do you think? ErnestKrause (talk) 01:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kumeko Urabe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kumeko Urabe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 19:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kumeko Urabe
The article Kumeko Urabe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kumeko Urabe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ErnestKrause -- ErnestKrause (talk) 15:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Simongraham!


Happy New Year! Simongraham, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Abishe (talk) 15:06, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Pytlivyy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet frigate Pytlivyy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 04:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Moorsom (1914)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Moorsom (1914) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 02:21, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Moorsom (1914)
The article HMS Moorsom (1914) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Moorsom (1914) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet frigate Pytlivyy
The article Soviet frigate Pytlivyy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet frigate Pytlivyy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 19:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Kumeko Urabe
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Alexander
Was Alexander launched in 1800 or 1807? Asking as you created the article. Mjroots (talk) 18:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia Asian Month 2021 Postcard
Dear Participants,

Congratulations!

It's Wikipedia Asian Month's honor to have you all participated in Wikipedia Asian Month 2021, the seventh Wikipedia Asian Month. Your achievements were fabulous, and all the articles you created make the world can know more about Asia in different languages! Here we, the Wikipedia Asian Month International team, would like to say thank you for your contribution also cheer for you that you are eligible for the postcard of Wikipedia Asian Month 2021. Please kindly fill the form, let the postcard can send to you asap!


 * This form will be closed at March 15.

Cheers!

Thank you and best regards,

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team, 2022.02

The Dreadnought Project
Dear Simon Graham. It would appear that since 2018 at the latest and up to the present time you have been copying fire control information from The Dreadnought Project and incorporating it into Wikipedia articles without attribution, whilst at the same time citing (often inaccurately and incompletely) our primary source references. This practice needs to stop. We don't mind our work being used on this website so long as it is properly attributed to The Dreadnought Project. Nor, for that matter, does WP:MILHIST. Regards, &mdash;Simon Harley (Talk | Library). 09:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

I am disappointed to have received this comment from a seasoned editor as I felt that your statements lacked the civility I would expect and did not assume good faith. Any inaccurate and incomplete referencing I have included is inadvertent or accidental, and, in my experience, quick to fix. Nobody has the right to act as though they are the owner of a particular article so please be bold and edit any article I have created. I hope you enjoy Wikipedia.

Women in Green - July GA Editathon
 Hello Simongraham:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Editathon event in July 2022!

Running from July 1 to 31, 2022, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event focused on the topic of women and the environment. Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works during the event period (with an emphasis on environmental links and topics). GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there! Alanna the Brave (talk) 19:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Birayma Dyeme-Kumba moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Birayma Dyeme-Kumba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 02:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Hymn to St Peter
Thank you for the article! I made a few changes, please revert if you don't agree. I think the lead is a tad to detailed for a summary. Do you plan to take it to DYK? My last Britten piece there was Five Flower Songs. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your changes. I feel they really improve the article. Please do more and submit it for DYK if you have the time.

Postwar Stalin bluewater operations
I've just stumbled across this book which might be useful if you want to do anymore post-war Soviet ships: Watson, Bruce. Red Navy At Sea: Soviet Naval Operations On The High Seas, 1956-1980. And should be consulted before sending your latest to FAC. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Maenad (1915)
The article HMS Maenad (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Maenad (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Maenad (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thehistorianisaac -- Thehistorianisaac (talk) 10:04, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Maenad (1915)
The article HMS Maenad (1915) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:HMS Maenad (1915) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thehistorianisaac -- Thehistorianisaac (talk) 10:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Mike Christie, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Maenad (1915)
The article HMS Maenad (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Maenad (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Maenad (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thehistorianisaac -- Thehistorianisaac (talk) 03:02, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mystic (1915)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Mystic (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 01:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Wrong Sydney award
It looks like you referred to the wrong Sydney here - east bound Atlantic convoys assembled at Sydney, Nova Scotia in both World Wars. At least you didn't buy an airline ticket to the wrong Sydney!Nigel Ish (talk) 10:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev
The article Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev for comments about the article, and Talk:Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Juan López Mella
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Juan López Mella you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 19:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Juan López Mella
The article Juan López Mella you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Juan López Mella and Talk:Juan López Mella/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 04:40, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Juan López Mella
The article Juan López Mella you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Juan López Mella for comments about the article, and Talk:Juan López Mella/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 10:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mystic (1915)
The article HMS Mystic (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Mystic (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Mystic (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:41, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Marne (1915)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Marne (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Myngs (1914)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Myngs (1914) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Juan López Mella
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Sturdy (1919)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Sturdy (1919) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:42, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Myngs (1914)
The article HMS Myngs (1914) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Myngs (1914) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Myngs (1914)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 02:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Sturdy (1919)
The article HMS Sturdy (1919) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Sturdy (1919) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Sturdy (1919)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

GA review for Hummingbird
Hello Simon - your work in guiding Sword-billed hummingbird to GA is much appreciated, as it appears to be the only hummingbird article with this standing. Could you please browse the Hummingbird article for its candidacy as a GA?

If you feel the hummingbird article is worthwhile, please also consider working with me and other editors as the reviewer to bring it to GA. Many thanks. Zefr (talk) 22:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Staunch (1910)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Staunch (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Please note that I've made my comments--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Staunch (1910)
The article HMS Staunch (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Staunch (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Staunch (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wanda Wesołowska
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wanda Wesołowska you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Martin (1910)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Martin (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wanda Wesołowska
The article Wanda Wesołowska you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wanda Wesołowska and Talk:Wanda Wesołowska/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Martin (1910)
The article HMS Martin (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Martin (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Martin (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wanda Wesołowska
The article Wanda Wesołowska you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wanda Wesołowska for comments about the article, and Talk:Wanda Wesołowska/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 06:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stenaelurillus guttiger
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stenaelurillus guttiger you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stenaelurillus guttiger
The article Stenaelurillus guttiger you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stenaelurillus guttiger and Talk:Stenaelurillus guttiger/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 19:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stenaelurillus guttiger
The article Stenaelurillus guttiger you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stenaelurillus guttiger for comments about the article, and Talk:Stenaelurillus guttiger/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 19:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Maurice Suckling
Hi, you were kind enough to do an image review for Maurice Suckling when the article was first up for ACR. My absence from the site led that nomination to be archived, but it's back now and I wondered whether you'd be willing to reiterate your support, considering the images have not changed? Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

DYK for HMS Martin (1910)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Wanda Wesołowska
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Penn (1916)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Penn (1916) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Ruby (1910)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Ruby (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:00, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023 Military History Project Contest Entries
I have checked and confirmed five of your entries. I have taken the initiative to delete what appears to be a duplicate Talk:Wattignies-class cruiser entry. I have not confirmed Fleurus because the talk page shows it unrated as of this time. I have not confirmed Soviet cruiser Vasily Chapayev because I read the talk page to show a change from GA to A, 15 points, rather than B to A, 18 points. If I have made any mistakes in this review, please let me know so that I can change or add an assessment as necessary. If I am slow to respond, a closing coordinator may correct any mistake that I have made or you may wish to ask a co-ordinator to check on it if the mistake is not first reverted by another reviewer or the closing coordinator. Thanks for all your hard work on these articles. Donner60 (talk) 07:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I think you are correct in all these so have amended the entries. Thank you for all your work on this contest. I have only just found it but it looks quite inspiring. simongraham 05:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I have not had a contest entry yet but I may have one or more in the future. I thought I could help the project in a small way by checking the entries so that those entering the contest would not have to take that on as well. I have worked on several articles recently and have a few in draft but the work has been mainly small or offline and not yet posted. I have not written any new articles for a few years, however. I was right to be cautious by suggesting checking my review. I obviously made an error in the number of points for Vasily Chapayev by not reading the scoring table carefully enough for that one. Thanks for correcting that. Donner60 (talk) 08:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

HMS Fury (1911) contest entry
The talk page shows that the assessment for this article was on May 1. I think this can be properly entered into the May Military History Project contest. You may wish to double check with a coordinator if my opinion appears to be mistaken or to reject the suggestion if you are aware that it is in fact mistaken. Donner60 (talk) 07:38, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Happy to make the change. simongraham 05:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Penn (1916)
The article HMS Penn (1916) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Penn (1916) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Penn (1916)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Munster
The article HMS Munster you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Munster for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Munster/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jack4576 -- Jack4576 (talk) 13:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Ruby (1910)
The article HMS Ruby (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Ruby (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Ruby (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Scout (1918)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Scout (1918) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Milbrook (1915)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Milbrook (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Milbrook (1915)
The article HMS Milbrook (1915) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Milbrook (1915) and Talk:HMS Milbrook (1915)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Scout (1918)
The article HMS Scout (1918) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Scout (1918) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Scout (1918)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:41, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Milbrook (1915)
The article HMS Milbrook (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Milbrook (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Milbrook (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Lookout (1914)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Lookout (1914) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Searcher (1918)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Searcher (1918) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:43, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Searcher (1918)
The article HMS Searcher (1918) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Searcher (1918) and Talk:HMS Searcher (1918)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 09:21, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Searcher (1918)
The article HMS Searcher (1918) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Searcher (1918) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Searcher (1918)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Lookout (1914)
The article HMS Lookout (1914) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Lookout (1914) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Lookout (1914)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Tapperheten (1901)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Tapperheten (1901) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:42, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Nasta Rojc
I admit I am not remotely technical, but I never got a formal bot notice that the GA had passed and the page still shows it is being reviewed? Sorry to trouble you. For the record, I did research Alexandrina Onslow, but on my side of the pond I could not find enough to write about her. I know she must have had a fascinating life. Both parents died by 1881, raised by her aunt, Udea Onslow (weird that her dad is sort of crossed out), Udea died in 1883, her husband Astley Thompson died in 1887 and rest of the family moved to Australia. It seems likely to me that she joined them there because her military records show her first service was in a hospital corps for the Australian diaspora. In 1911 (aged 46] she was living at the Crofton Grange School run by Mary Alice Lyster. How she came to own a yacht, join the Scottish Women's Hospitals, etc. is all a mystery. obit 15 Feb 1950 SusunW (talk) 16:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Tapperheten (1901)
The article HSwMS Tapperheten (1901) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Tapperheten (1901) for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Tapperheten (1901)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Tourmaline (1875)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Tourmaline (1875) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 13:24, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Tourmaline (1875)
The article HMS Tourmaline (1875) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Tourmaline (1875) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Tourmaline (1875)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)
The article Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) and Talk:Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)
The article Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Italian frigate Alpino (F 580) for comments about the article, and Talk:Italian frigate Alpino (F 580)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

HSwMS Tapperheten (1901)
I have confirmed your recent contest entries except for the captioned one. My opinion is that you should be able to claim "none" for the start rating. That is based on the sequence of ratings: no ratings, you ask for GA, WP Ships rates as B but WP Ships is not a task force of the Military History Project, Military History Bot rates C while GA is on review, then GA is approved for the Military History Project rating. I am sure the WP Ships rating does not apply for the contest. I also think the Bot rating that comes after the GA request should not apply for the contest. I have seen at least one other such rating recently and gave an opinion that since the GA request was made before the bot rating, the Military History Project class rating at the time the GA request was made should be used as the entry rating for the contest. Since this sequence of assessments appears likely to occur from time to time, I have asked for confirmation of my opinion on the Military History co-ordinators talk page and have pinged you about that posting. Donner60 (talk) 03:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)


 * If I had been paying full attention to this, I would have seen that you had already claimed the lower rating in July. Sturmvogel66 has now confirmed the August rating. He is more experienced in the contest and I will not disturb his rating and I do not see a reason to pose a question about it. In total you are getting the full credit for your improvements which was my intended starting point. It also appears I did not pose the exact scenario on the co-ordinator talk page but I have been given some guidance for similar situations. I am glad Sturmvogel66 stepped up and handled this. Sorry for the bother. I have had a few learning experiences with confirmations. As long as I continue to do them, and get them right eventually, it is good to have some guidance about entries which do not seem to be covered specifically by the contest rules. Thanks for your numerous great contributions to the project. Donner60 (talk) 07:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Epsom riot has an RFC
Talk:Epsom riot has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the |discussion page. Thank you. Polyamorph (talk) 13:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mansfield (1914)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Mansfield (1914) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 04:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in the August 2023 GAN backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Contest?
Hello, I noticed you've been working a lot on Tree of Life related articles in the past month; maybe you'd like to note your contributions at the Tree of Life Contest? AryKun (talk) 15:30, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. That looks really interesting. I will see what I can do to sign up. simongraham (talk) 04:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Saladin (1919)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Saladin (1919) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mansfield (1914)
The article HMS Mansfield (1914) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Mansfield (1914) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Mansfield (1914)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Saladin (1919)
The article HMS Saladin (1919) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Saladin (1919) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Saladin (1919)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:20, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

HSwMS Manligheten
After the alterations, the hull was 90.2 m (296 ft) long at the waterline and 35 tonnes (34 long tons) tonnes in displacement.

It may be strong opinion, but I dont think that is possible. Something is missing there. PMG (talk) 15:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Pylades (1854)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Pylades (1854) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:22, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Reminder
Hey, just wanted to remind you to note your contributions at the ToL Contest if you want to, since I noticed you haven't yet. AryKun (talk) 08:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Pylades (1854)
The article HMS Pylades (1854) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Pylades (1854) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Pylades (1854)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Nemesis (1910)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Nemesis (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Nemesis (1910)
The article HMS Nemesis (1910) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Nemesis (1910) and Talk:HMS Nemesis (1910)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 22:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Nemesis (1910)
The article HMS Nemesis (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Nemesis (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Nemesis (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 05:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation
Hi Simongraham :) I'm looking to interview people here, feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 21:05, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Minion (1915)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Minion (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 11:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Minion (1915)
The article HMS Minion (1915) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Minion (1915) and Talk:HMS Minion (1915)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 12:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings!
Happy Holidays text.png

Your GA nomination of HMS Minion (1915)
The article HMS Minion (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Minion (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Minion (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 11:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mosquito (1910)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Mosquito (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 22:42, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Sirdar (1918)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Sirdar (1918) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Simongraham. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for maintenance so that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
 * Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
 * Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. signed,Rosguill talk 23:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Mosquito (1910)
The article HMS Mosquito (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Mosquito (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Mosquito (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 03:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Sirdar (1918)
The article HMS Sirdar (1918) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Sirdar (1918) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Sirdar (1918)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Racoon (1910)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Racoon (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Menemerus animatus
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Menemerus animatus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 17:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Menemerus animatus
The article Menemerus animatus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Menemerus animatus for comments about the article, and Talk:Menemerus animatus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

HSwMS Äran
Working to add at least one reference to the MilHist unreferenced articles, I copied the design and development para from your HSwMS Tapperheten article over to Äran. Unless there are significant differences between the sisters, all you need to do is work on its career for an easy GA. Just let me know whenever you do that and I'll do the review. Speaking of those, I'll respond your changes on Racoon later today. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Äran
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Äran you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Rattlesnake (1910)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Rattlesnake (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Racoon (1910)
The article HMS Racoon (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Racoon (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Racoon (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Äran
The article HSwMS Äran you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Äran for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Äran/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd
The article Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd for comments about the article, and Talk:Soviet cruiser Vitse-Admiral Drozd/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Wasa (1901)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Wasa (1901) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Rattlesnake (1910)
The article HMS Rattlesnake (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Rattlesnake (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Rattlesnake (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Afraflacilla braunsi
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Afraflacilla braunsi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 22:42, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Afraflacilla braunsi
The article Afraflacilla braunsi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Afraflacilla braunsi for comments about the article, and Talk:Afraflacilla braunsi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 16:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Clas Fleming
I've finished with everything I could find on the ship. Harris, my primary source, is self-contradictory in places so feel free to change whatever doesn't match your Swedish sources. And you want to change my cites to sfn or whatever, I'm OK with that. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Do you read Swedish yourself or do you use a translation program? I ask because I was building a topic box of all the Swedish DDs and found more than a few Swedish-language titles of interest. Some of these are not readily available from libraries like Jagare: med Svenska flottans jagare under 80 år, but are available for not too much money. The article on HSWMS Nordenskjöld has other books that look to be helpful for our little project.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * That does look a useful list. Thank you. Good luck tracking them down. It does take me a bit of time to process the text as I have more experience of Norwegian than Swedish, but non-English sources can provide valuable insights lacking in the English literature so I feel it is worth it. I find translation programs helpful, particularly for languages I have less experience of like Polish, but I am wary of trusting in them alone. simongraham (talk) 01:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Agreed, my French isn't very good, but it's good enough to validate/correct the translation programs.
 * The editor who did Nordenskjöld had done a bunch of other DDs as well. They all need some work, including a proper description, but could pretty easily be cleaned up for a GAN. I dunno how much your readily available Swedish sources can add, but it might be worth inviting him to our little scheme since he has access to books that neither one of us have. No reason why we can't have triple nominators, after all. What do you think?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 10:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Sounds reasonable. simongraham (talk) 12:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Wasa (1901)
The article HSwMS Wasa (1901) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Wasa (1901) for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Wasa (1901)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

HSwMS Wrangel (25)
I've added everything I could and rewritten the article. Hopefully you can dig up more from your Swedish sources; the info on her activities is far sparser than I'd prefer. Even a general statement that she did neutrality patrols and convoy escort missions during the war would be better than what's there now.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * There is not much in the literature I have access to either but I have added a couple of newspaper reports. simongraham (talk)

Your GA nomination of Phintella parva
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phintella parva you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ealdgyth -- Ealdgyth (talk) 15:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Manligheten
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Manligheten you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Manligheten
The article HSwMS Manligheten you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HSwMS Manligheten and Talk:HSwMS Manligheten/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Still a couple of quibbles to deal with.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Lake Chad
Hello, I just corrected some obvious issues you pointed out, but I still have a few questions. I hope you can answer them:

1. I think Leblanc et al 2006 still have value in being used in this article, as the research is based on geological evidence. Do you think the problem can be solved by reducing the length of relevant paragraphs?
 * I agree that Leclanc et al 2006 is very useful. I suggest seeing if there are other writings that can be added for balance rather than reducing the content that is there currently.

2. I think the relevant parts of the Ancient Rome can be directly deleted or summarized more concisely with other sources. I don't know how you think about this issue?
 * That seems reasonable. If there are no sources for the statements they should be replaced by something that is reliably sourced.

3. You pointed out potential copyright issues, does this mean that I should reduce some content based on the Encyclopedia Britannica? I have already made some reduce. Do you think I should continue to reduce the length of related content?
 * Excellent work; Earwig now gives a 23.7% similarity, which is a substantial improvement.

4. You have provided many supplementary sources, thank you very much. I will use these sources to further improve. However, you mentioned that the article lacks a description of the history of pre European periods. But I completely do not understand Hausa language. Would you be willing to provide some sources?
 * I am really glad to be of help. There are plenty on the various Hausa Kingdoms in the area and the Kanem–Bornu Empire in English too. A relatively recent book on the Empire is A History of Borno: Trans-Saharan African Empire to Failing Nigerian State[]. Lange's Ancient Kingdoms of West Africa[] may also be useful, not least because the studies in its tend to be more Africa-centric than many other sources. Saulawa's 2016 paper on Leo Africanus[] may also be helpful.

Thank you very much for your help. Newbamboo (talk) 13:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your work on this. Answers above. I suggest we continue this discussion on the GA review talk page. simongraham (talk) 18:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
 * May I ask if you can check now? Thank you. Newbamboo (talk) 23:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I have completed it. Do you have any other comments? Thank you. Newbamboo (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Plexippoides regius
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Plexippoides regius you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 01:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

3 volume history of the Swedish Navy
I found links to pdf of the above at User:Saftgurka's home page. Hopefully there's some stuff there about the wartime activities of the various ships as well as background info on procurement decisions in volume III. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 10:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Plexippoides regius
The article Plexippoides regius you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Plexippoides regius for comments about the article, and Talk:Plexippoides regius/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 23:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Manligheten
The article HSwMS Manligheten you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Manligheten for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Manligheten/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Niord
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Niord you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello ,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Supermarine Spiteful GAN
Hi there, I have now acquired a copy of Morgan and Shacklady, which has a whole chapter on the Spiteful that I have not had access to before, and I would like to expand the article using this resource. Also, a couple of editors have recently done work on the article without discussing it on the talk or review pages first. As both of these issues imo make the article/nomination rather unstable, I would like a week before checking their work and adding more myself. Is that OK? Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 11:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That seems very reasonable. I look forward to seeing your enhancements to the article. simongraham (talk) 13:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Oden
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HSwMS Oden you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 21:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Spiteful
Hi, I now think I have gone as far as I can with the article, apologies for the delay. Amitchell125 (talk) 11:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Excellent work. This is now a GA. simongraham (talk)

Your GA nomination of HMS Renard (1909)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Renard (1909) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Niord
The article HSwMS Niord you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Niord for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Niord/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

GAN backlog drive barnstar
asilvering (talk) 21:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HSwMS Oden
The article HSwMS Oden you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HSwMS Oden for comments about the article, and Talk:HSwMS Oden/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 11:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Tetrarch (1917)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Tetrarch (1917) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Tetrarch (1917)
The article HMS Tetrarch (1917) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Tetrarch (1917) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Tetrarch (1917)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Tree of Life Contest entries
Hey Simon, I just wanted to let you know that I've removed several of your entries for this month at the TOL Contest. You worked on those articles from January to March, so they aren't eligible for points this month. Thanks, AryKun (talk) 01:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I noticed. How would you like an entrant to count an article that is improved one month but not reassessed until a subsequent month please? That is particularly common for articles nominated for GA but may also occur in other cases. Incidentally, my name is simongraham; you are not the first to assume. simongraham (talk) 05:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * For GAs and FAs, it’s fine to use the month in which they pass for the points, since these are processes that involve external reviews that can take time. For anything up to B-class, you can usually just change the rating yourself and add it in the month in which you did most of the work on the article. This is a monthly contest, so if you forget to claim points on some articles in a particular month, you can’t really carry them forward and claim them later. AryKun (talk) 16:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you. It is good to know what your preference is. simongraham (talk)

Your GA nomination of HMS Basilisk (1910)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Basilisk (1910) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Evarcha maculata
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Evarcha maculata you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Basilisk (1910)
The article HMS Basilisk (1910) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Basilisk (1910) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Basilisk (1910)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Renard (1909)
The article HMS Renard (1909) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Renard (1909) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Renard (1909)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Menace (1915)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Menace (1915) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Evarcha maculata
The article Evarcha maculata you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Evarcha maculata for comments about the article, and Talk:Evarcha maculata/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Evarcha praeclara
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Evarcha praeclara you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Relativity -- Relativity (talk) 02:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in WP:GARC
Hello Simongraham, I noticed you have an article listed at WP:GAN. I recently started a project, Good Article Review Circles, and thought you might be interested. This initiative helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you'll review others' articles and get your own reviewed in return. Check out the page for more details! — GMH Melbourne (talk) 09:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Phintella parva
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Phintella parva you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI (talk) 10:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Phintella parva
The article Phintella parva you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Phintella parva for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI (talk) 13:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Evarcha praeclara
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Evarcha praeclara you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Relativity -- Relativity (talk) 20:41, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Menace (1915)
The article HMS Menace (1915) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Menace (1915) for comments about the article, and Talk:HMS Menace (1915)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Contest entry HMS Menace (1915)
I have checked the contest entry for this article which was entered as none > GA. However, the article had been rated B class by a rater, not a bot, in an earlier month. The bot carried it forward but User:Rfl0216 had rated it B class for military history and ships. It appears this should be entered as B > GA. Have I missed something here or should this be changed to B > GA? Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 06:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The article has not been entered in the competition before as the goal was to edit it until it was promoted to GA but I have no preference so please do change it if that works for you. simongraham (talk) 00:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * After entering a confused note about bot reviews here, it occurred to me that you actually had clarified that the article had been entered in the contest earlier. So I checked that and it means that the current contest entry should start as B class. Sorry for my overall confusion; and I hope you did not waste time with my previous note which I have just removed several minutes after posting it. Donner60 (talk) 02:19, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you. In trying to clarify, I mistyped and so may have achieved the opposite. The article has not been entered before. Sorry for the confusion. simongraham (talk) 16:26, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the DCWC!


Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, Simongraham! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:


 * Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
 * Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
 * Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
 * New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
 * Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators:, , or. (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh ) 00:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks!
Pichpich (talk) 16:02, 9 July 2024 (UTC)