User talk:Simonuspc

Quebec Deaths
I'm happy to move it into text format for now until we see how deaths are reported. I would like to keep the information handy in case in the future we get the data presented in such a manner.

Therefore, as a compromise I'll do just that, and we can re-evaluate in a few days to see if it should enter a table or not. --Gau Choob (talk) 16:37, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

How is it that we have a negative death? Zombies? :p -- RemainingAnonymous, 13:30, 23 March 2020 (EST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.203.117.87 (talk)

From

https://www.msss.gouv.qc.ca/professionnels/maladies-infectieuses/coronavirus-2019-ncov#definition-de-cas

2 : Le nombre de décès lié au COVID-19 est inférieur à celui annoncé le 21 mars 2020. Le test de l’une de ces personnes s’est montré négatif. Simonuspc (talk) 17:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Severity in chart
Recovered + Dead + Mild + Serious should equal the total I think.

So should subtract dead and recovered from the mild category? --Gau Choob (talk) 05:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

What's the source for the serious and mild cases? What I am saying is, if the person is dead, they are not considered a mild or serious case. If the person is recovered, they are not considered a mild or serious case. So for example, for Mar 19, I think 112 mild cases makes more sense than 114 --Gau Choob (talk) 18:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Sure we can delete the deaths row
Feel free to go ahead and do that if you agree with me. --Gau Choob (talk) 18:46, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Hospitalized = ?ICU
I'm actually not sure either, sorry.

March 21 Legault says 10 hospitalized (une augmentation de neuf) and 10 in ICU (+4) http://www.assnat.qc.ca/fr/actualites-salle-presse/conferences-points-presse/ConferencePointPresse-58345.html

Sounds like it's separate but not 100% sure

--Gau Choob (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Cases change
https://web.archive.org/web/20200326035944/https://www.quebec.ca/sante/problemes-de-sante/a-z/coronavirus-2019/situation-coronavirus-quebec/

They say the number 14 yesterday was a typo and the number was actually 41.

1. L’augmentation observée pour la région de Chaudière-Appalaches n’est pas une réelle augmentation du nombre de cas en 24 heures, mais plutôt attribuable à une erreur de transmission de la donnée en date du 24 mars (le nombre était plutôt de 41 et non 14)

--Gau Choob (talk) 05:05, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Makes sense! I had not noticed that! Simonuspc (talk) 11:53, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Gonna remove your .svg
Please put them back if you update them, but right now they are out of date.



Cheers --Gau Choob (talk) 19:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)