User talk:Simonwakefield

Speedy deletion of Judith Hornbogen
A tag has been placed on Judith Hornbogen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 18:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi there. I deleted the article because it failed to assert notability. There were no references to third party sources (e.g. newspaper articles) to show that Hornbogen has "received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" (WP:NOTABILITY). The fact that she gets only 7 hits on google suggests she is not worthy of an article on Wikipedia. Regards, пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  23:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)