User talk:Simostar

Welcome!
Hello, Simostar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

December 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 1985, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 14:21, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Good afternoon User:Elizium23. Pardon me but there must be a misunderstanding here, as I'm not the same guy as the IP user you reverted before, you can fact-check that. Moreover, you should notify users with warnings, instead of threatening them of getting blocked straight away. This is the common practice, and also a sign of good manners.


 * The reason why I wrote back the edits that IP made on 1985 (a page I have on my personal watchlist) is that they are genuinely good edits:


 * Hamilton won his 7th F1 championship a few weeks ago, the news is widely known and easily checkable, to the extent that it was reported under the "In the News" section of the Wikipedia main page, too;
 * that guy Jerome d'Ambrosio is apparently an existing person with his own wiki article, so there's no need to add a source to prove his existence. And he seems worth of being mentioned in the list;
 * moreover, I ordered the people born on the same day as Jerome d'Ambrosio in alphabetical order, which is not a bad thing per sé.


 * I don't know how these three points sound as poorly sourced and disruptive edits to you. I suppose you merely reverted without checking. I'm sure you're acting in good faith, but I invite you to take your time checking facts (and editors' identities) before reverting, since acting so blindly is not constructive and is not in the best interests of Wikipedia. Not everything an IP does is necessarily bad, otherwise they wouldn't be allowed to edit articles. Please check, always.


 * I'm waiting for your consent to reinstate that edit. Meanwhile, have a good day. Simostar (talk) 15:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , per WP:V, inline citations are required for all material likely to be challenged. Wikipedia is not a reliable source, so you may not rely on its articles as sources. Copy the source out of the referenced article to use it there. Elizium23 (talk) 15:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Although I can't see how any of this is likely to be challenged, it seems the only problem here is providing a source for Hamilton's 7th title, am I correct? Why don't just marking that with a citation needed request, instead of blindly carpet-revert others' edits? Anyway, I'll put a source, it's not a problem.


 * I didn't use any wikipedia article as source. I don't get it. Is yours a precompiled, automatic answer? Simostar (talk) 15:44, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)