User talk:Simpleediting

Welcome!
Hello, Simpleediting, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 11:19, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Objections to evolution. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 05:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Theistic evolution, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 06:19, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


 * One can certainly remain in awe appreciating life and consciousness while at the same time making use of intelligence to understand how they arised through natural means. In any case, the main issue with your edits were that they were unsourced (please see WP:RS and WP:CITE) and that they were personal editorial comments (WP:EDITORIAL, WP:OR).  Lastly, they violated WP:NPOV: Wikipedia articles must reflect the position of reliable scholarly sources.  Thanks, — Paleo  Neonate  – 12:31, 10 August 2018 (UTC)