User talk:Simplexity22/Archive 1

Salaries
Hi, when adding the salaries of the premiers can you also add a reference like I did with the NWT. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Pending revisions
I noticed you accepted this revision on Non-Hispanic whites, which is a deliberate factual error. You must be more careful when accepting pending revisions. MB298 (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

I noticed you accepted this revision on January 20, which deleted factual information. As this is not the first time that you have accepted inappropriate edits, I am alerting you that this kind of irresponsible editing on your part must stop. Quis separabit? 21:35, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

...and this and this on Tommy Wiseau, which insert uncited content onto a WP:BLP article. DMacks (talk) 21:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry about all this, regarding Non-Hispanic whites, I didn't think I was required to check correctness based off WP:Reviewing pending changes (second paragraph), I will be more careful going forward. Simplexity22 (talk) 21:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! DMacks (talk) 22:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Simplexity22. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ASimplexity22 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  03:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 26th Canadian Ministry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Reynolds. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Online casino
Hey, Simplexity22, in my opinion, you made mistake or I don't understand the whole idea of an encyclopedia. Linked site has 16 million of words about casinos online, what is relevant to the page of online casinos and offers. Can you add referring link back to the page?
 * Hi, The Online casino page is not a list of "online casinos and offers", and the fact that you added the link in a ref next to the word "offer" doesn't change that. References are meant to factually support the text that is written, not to link to an external site in a way that doesn't do this.


 * I'm not going to re-add the link, but there's nothing stopping you from re-adding it yourself to seek a second opinion. Simplexity22 (talk) 20:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

71.92.62.37
putting this msg here since I can't seem to talk to you normally like with the last guy. as I told him my IP is a dynamic, you have no cookies or data put on my computer, and even if you do block me it is meaningless and will only give you a few more seconds of time before another edit happens. I will also inform you it is best to leave it up for a day and then take it down. if you lock down the page I will simply find another page to put that into over and over again for the rest of the day. I love my off days, its quite fun ^~^ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.92.62.37 (talk) 23:54, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

68.54.0.181
Please stop removing good faith content prior to the addition of the citation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.0.181 (talk) 04:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * The burden is on you to provide a reference, not other users to wait. Quotes should be referenced at the same time they are added, and adding unreferenced quotes from living people is a violation of WP:BLP. Simplexity22 (talk) 04:35, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Bell1985
Hey man,

What's all this stuff you threw up on my page? Bell1985 (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Maybe nothing, just ruling out a connection between you and these accounts. Your first edit happened almost exactly the same time LineCoding was blocked, and was the same edit he/she was making. See this also. Simplexity22 (talk) 20:23, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

104.244.231.56
You made a mistake on the weather vane article. That was not me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.244.231.56 (talk) 01:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Your IP is probably shared, and someone else likely made the edit. The message was regarding this edit, which did come from your IP. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:10, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Senate Conservative Caucus
I am not denying his right to delete the PROD based on the rules of Wikipedia, I'm objecting to it because there is an active discussion going on at Wikipedia_talk:Canadian_Wikipedians%27_notice_board where one other prominent user has already agreed the PROD should be there. Charles lindberg (talk) 02:34, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * That's not how PRODs work. If any editor objects, then you have to proceed by an AFD. It doesn't matter if there is an "active discussion" or if one other editor ("prominent" or not) supports the PROD. The AFD is the place for an active discussion, not a PROD. PROD's only proceed when no discussion is needed becuase there are no objections. Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 02:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, please read the policy I linked in my edit summary (WP:CONTESTED), PROD is a "one shot" process, if any editor removes the tag for any reason you cannot re-add it. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

65.94.59.199
oh oops sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.94.59.199 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

NPR
Please be sure to use the correct CSD criterion. Craig Fletcher is blatant vandalism. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * My bad, thanks. Simplexity22 (talk) 08:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Uncategorized tag
As an FYI, it is generally better to quickly look for a category with WP:HOTCAT rather than slap on the uncategorized tag. Its in my opinion one of the most jarring tags (especially for stubs) and can easily be avoided for most articles. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:59, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll keep that in mind, thanks. Simplexity22 (talk) 01:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ...and I've added categories to the articles I've tagged so far. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, nevermind, I misread that response as you saying I didn't see something, so blanking the old response and putting this! Thank you for going back and categorizing! I was more letting you know for future reference, but it is certainly appreciated. Good work. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Rodrigo Jr. Saturay
Thanks for working speedy deletions and new page patrol. I know it can be a thankless job.

For the above article, I've userfied it based on the creator's username, as it appeared to be an article about that user. You can do this too if you come across similar articles in the future. Stifle (talk) 08:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Noted, thanks for letting me know. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:16, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Dragon Burn
Please send me the deleted article material so I may improve it. Ellesaye (talk) 13:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi, you should contact the admin who deleted the page (who is listed here), I cannot access deleted pages, thanks. Simplexity22 (talk) 21:46, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Antifa
when sorces become available (and they will) you'll accept this edit?
 * Antifa Front group for a domestic pederast heroin cartel and extension of the Obama administration backed Afghan pederast opium cartel. They're heroin abusers who were told they were supporting terrorists so they went and out rightly joined them.
 * 107.77.209.142 (talk) 01:31, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

do these chalk up? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrjDajYy9hY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0Lj6l7YPYw
 * 107.77.209.142 (talk) 01:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/16/world/asia/afghanistan-opium-heroin-taliban-helmand.html
 * 107.77.209.142 (talk) 01:55, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/world/asia/28intel.html?_r=0
 * http://www.thedailybeast.com/the-karzai-brothers-fight-back
 * 107.77.209.142 (talk) 01:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Antifa is a disambiguation page, which is meant to link to other existing articles with similar titles. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:02, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Regardless, I'm not interested in getting into a debate with you, I don't care enough about the topic. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:07, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * that doesn't really answer my question. can i take it that you wouldn't object to,
 * Antifa Front group and heroin cartel extension of the Obama administration backed Afghan pederast opium cartel who 'chemical addiction trap' and keep Bacha Bazis.   They're heroin abusers who were told they were supporting terrorists so they went and out-rightly joined them. 107.77.209.142 (talk) 02:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * It doesn't answer your question because your question doesn't make sense, I don't have to accept an edit you make to Antifa, I was simply reverting your unsourced contrib. Please take these sources somewhere else, I don't care about the topic and I'm not going to get into a debate with you (and to be clear, I haven't looked at any of the sources you provided). Simplexity22 (talk) 02:50, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * And no, I won't revert again if you provide sources in your edit. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * OK 107.77.209.142 (talk) 03:08, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry I accidentally reverted your edit on the article Freerunning. actually i was trying to click on the link of to revert a vanadalising IP address's edit but my accidentally clicked yours and realized later. I'm sorry and hope you will understand. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 07:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't think you did, from what I can see every revert you made to that page was to the IP. It's no problem, regardless! Simplexity22 (talk) 07:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, it must have been a misunderstanding. sorry for wasting your time. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 07:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * All good! Thanks for helping out! Simplexity22 (talk) 07:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

MonkeyKingdom
Please review Sam Bitangaro. Thanx! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MonkeyKingdom (talk • contribs) 13:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. Simplexity22 (talk) 21:03, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Delhi Meerut RRTS - RevDel - redaction
Hi, I humbly appreciate your concern regarding copyright violations in some content on the page. U too undid the same and removed the challenged content. But putting the entire history of article under WP:Redaction is grossly inappropriate since those revisions contain a significant amount of original content too (far more than the one challenged for copyright violations). Even the guideline for Redaction prohibits it's use in such a situation. I have already done corrections in light of the violations. Undoing a revision seems like a more proper way of resolving such a thing than grossly redacting it. I request you to kindly remove the Redaction template thereof.

Anand.abhishek73 (talk) 11:58, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * You're right...tag removed. Simplexity22 (talk) 19:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Survey Invite
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=6ybvGHdBVVUDi1D_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_czGbBRktWIEZfOB&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 20:45, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

for my edit on minimum wage laws
I don't see any other entries on that page speculating minimum wages outside of the US. They just state what they are what they will be by laws passed. I really don't think that extra information should be on that page. I take it you disagree? I won't edit again until we reach agreement. Subzeroicedude (talk) 09:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't agree or disagree, I only reverted your edit because you removed a portion of sourced text without giving reason. Simplexity22 (talk) 14:12, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * ...and to be clear, I won't revert again if you give a reason in your edit summary (as you did with your second edit). Simplexity22 (talk) 14:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Imperial Crown Style
Hey what's going on with that massive amount of translation you deleted I've been working on? Dr.khatmando (talk) 07:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I think you're mistaken, I reverted a vandal's edit to your version, see this. Simplexity22 (talk) 07:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Oh gosh! Thank you! I was in mid flight moving from a Japanese PhD thesis to the article. Sorry for the knee jerk reaction just had kittens momentarily. Thanks again for your help Dr.khatmando (talk) 08:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Not a problem, and thanks for all your hard work! Simplexity22 (talk) 08:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Good oh! I had a look at their his talk page and he seemed to have been blocked in the past 48 hours but this was recently lifted. Can we put some more permanent shackles on his account? Thanks again.
 * It's an IP, which generally aren't blocked for too long. The block is still ongoing, see Special:Contributions/112.198.101.33 (the box at the top).
 * This particular user is a long term vandal who hops between several IPs and accounts, see Long-term abuse/My Royal Young, so if you ever see a user replacing content with "Spearton" or "BLOBBLIBBBLOBBLIB" in the future, feel free to report to WP:ANV. Simplexity22 (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Good oh! Have noted that. Cheers,Dr.khatmando (talk) 08:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your vandalism help at Whataboutism. Much appreciated, Sagecandor (talk) 16:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem, thanks. Simplexity22 (talk) 19:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Larissa Onyshkevych changed to draftification.
I removed your speedy deletion tag from Larissa Onyshkevych, and moved it to the draft space instead. There seems to be lots of reliable sources about this person, and while the current article is undersourced, it is best served by being kept as a draft that the user can expand, rather than deleted prematurely. Before nominating articles for deletion, have a quick search for sources on the subject, and if some exist, but the article is very undersourced, consider using draftification instead of nominating articles for deletion. Thanks. —  InsertCleverPhraseHere  03:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Noted, will keep that in mind. Thanks. Simplexity22 (talk) 03:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

The editor who abused you have been blocked
Hello ! I am not an administrator but a user like you, I observed some time back you reverted few edits and warned a vandal. And they abused you, I hope you are fine and didn't got affected by that trolls abuses. I reported that incident at Admin incident noticeboard and fortunately an admin noticed it and blocked that abusers. Please don't remain silent and tolerate abuses or think about quitting Wikipedia because of this trolls. You should immediately report at Admin noticeboards. If you want to keep it confidential then you should email an admin about such incidents. Take care and have a lovely day. Anoptimistix  Let's Talk  06:33, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * It's all good, really, just some fairly uncreative trolling from a vandal who's edits I've been reverting for a few months now. Simplexity22 (talk) 06:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ...and yes, I reported to AIV. Simplexity22 (talk) 06:37, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Diary Product Edit
Hey, man. You left a message in User talk:24.50.205.133 and it seems to me that, although the person who made the non-constructive edits to the Diary Product page was using the IP address 24.50.205.133 at that time. Since the service I'm provided is one with dynamic IP, I'm certain that person's too, because I now have that IP address and it was not me. Mitologus (talk) 18:10, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

V.cross
What are the numbers for? V.cross (talk) 20:59, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Which numbers? Simplexity22 (talk) 21:00, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

The ones in the bracket. V.cross (talk) 21:04, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

The changes was a mistake, however i dont know what the numbers are for. V.cross (talk) 21:06, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Assuming you mean the numbers in this edit. 10.1186/1471-2393-11-18 seems to be the ID used by biomedcentral.com, 3063235 is the ID used by www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc, and 21396090 is the ID used by www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/. Though honestly, I'm not entirely sure either. Simplexity22 (talk) 21:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * i.e. click the numbers in the references section (here), and see the numbers at the end of the URL. Simplexity22 (talk) 21:13, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok V.cross (talk) 21:16, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

George Salazar and blepping
I wish they'd protect the page already :P Thanks for keeping the hordes at bay. Kbseah (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Done just as you said that. Thanks to you as well! Simplexity22 (talk) 00:38, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

25 flippin' reversions.
Dear God lol. Booyahhayoob (talk) 04:29, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Haha, yep. Simplexity22 (talk) 04:29, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * You're welcome. Thanks for the barnstar, much appreciated! Simplexity22 (talk) 05:16, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Jsrod83
I am curious how I violated anything, I simply shared information on a page that is supposedly dedicated to alternate 9/11 theories. If you do not care to share information then you are part of the coverup — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsrod83 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:EL and WP:LINKSPAM, you're free to use external links in the body of an article as a reference to factual content, not to draw an audience to a website. Simplexity22 (talk) 21:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

So I am clear, I can mention my finding just not provide a link to the website? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsrod83 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * In general, yes. If you'd like to add content to the article using a website as a reference, you can. That's not to say other editors won't oppose your addition, however, and you should make sure it complies with WP:NPOV. You also shouldn't add content for the sole purpose of promoting an individual. Simplexity22 (talk) 21:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I've removed it twice. An unsourced comment that "Dr. Judy Wood has been influential in providing alternate theories such as the use of direct energy weapons." isn't any better. Without reliable sources showing that direct energy weapons are seriously being considered and that Judy Wood is influential in this this is not going in the article. Meters (talk) 22:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Never mind. Blocked while I was writing the above. Meters (talk) 22:08, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Quick question
Hey Simplexity22, hope you're well. Could you please email me? My email is on my user page.

I see you've worked on Kap G's Wikipedia and had a question I wanted to discuss. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CMCreator900 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Looking for help
Hi Simplexity22, hope you are doing well. May I know how can I edit the wiki page on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Certification_Institute as it is stating that it has been locked by admin. Look forward to your advice. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtaynl (talk • contribs) 19:29, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi I see you have prepared a draft at User:Jtaynl/sandbox. Your best option would be to wait for your draft to be reviewed, and if its accepted, the reviewer will likely request the page be unprotected, and will move it on your behalf. Simplexity22 (talk) 21:11, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

i need help in page madhan
In india madhan is a notable star actor but writer is know as Maadapoosi KRISHNASWAMY GOVINDA IYENGAR his orginal name and here all called madan or mathan so pls help the name of writer page as mathan or madan and the actor madhan no problem change that heading to madhan (actor) or as it same- from chennai ,india — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennaiboys (talk • contribs) 04:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're asking me to do. Do you want me to rename Madhan (writer) to Madan/Mathan, or something else? Simplexity22 (talk) 04:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

yes madhan writer to madan page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennaiboys (talk • contribs) 04:53, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I moved Madhan (writer) to Madan (writer), Madan already exists so I can't move it there. Simplexity22 (talk) 04:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmathan.actor (talk • contribs) 12:45, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

help me for sentence check for last edit in madhan page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennaiboys (talk • contribs) 13:42, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi Simplexity22, just so you know, I looked into sourcing for this article and found that the spelling "Madhan" was much more common, so I reverted your move. There seems to be some kind of promotional effort going on for another person by this name, and sadly, such things sometimes include attempts to remove articles about other uses of a name - it looks like that was what happened here. In any case, I just wanted to let you know, and hope you won't mind. --bonadea contributions talk 16:07, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Not a problem, and thanks for cleaning this all up! Simplexity22 (talk) 20:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
 * Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Accidental revert
Sorry for the revert at Geography of Canada, I pressed the wrong button. --Cadillac000 (talk) 23:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * All good, thanks. Simplexity22 (talk) 23:37, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Persistent sockpuppets
As we can see all the edits on MCC and all those page creations. I am thinking of collecting as many accounts as possible and report them all to WP:SPI, but I think we should also report to admin's noticeboard/incidents or so. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. 🖉← 04:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I made a report at WP:ANI, hopefully they'll get bored soon. Simplexity22 (talk) 04:44, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Good. I will check it out. I now have the SPI case, but still need to add accounts for ongoing new page spam. -★- PlyrStar93 . → Message me. 🖉← 04:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Page mover granted
Hello, Simplexity22. Your account has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A granted] the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Alex ShihTalk 07:53, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

I can see!
Oh user:Simplexity22, you are right in the speedy deletion you tag on the name space which i created as my user talk page! http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/userpage:Visionjohnny Sorry Continue! Visionjohnny (talk) 02:44, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Bane of zeus
Sorry about the thing on the joseph ect. Page i was just showing a freind somrthing. I wont do it again Bane of zeus (talk) 02:50, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your help
Please, please and please help to check http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Solid_Rock_Kingdom_Church For review! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Visionjohnny (talk • contribs)
 * Hi On first glance, this page needs some unaffiliated references in order to establish notability. I'd recommend doing a Google search for some additional sources, and expanding the page using them as references. Once you think the page is ready for publishing, you can submit it to WP:AFC. And please remember to sign your talk-page messages with " ~ ", thank you! Simplexity22 (talk) 03:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

College application form
Im doing a school based asssesment and i needed both info and a pic of an college application form, i typed it in many ways and nothing came up, is there any info or pic on this? V.cross (talk) 08:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not aware of anything, sorry. Simplexity22 (talk) 08:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Sorry
Whoops sorry I probably should've mentioned I had moved the talkpage prior to the request!, I'll let you slap me with a wet fish! :), ANyway thanks for moving that much appreciated :) – Davey 2010 Talk 02:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries, haha. I just clicked "move talk-page" by accident :). And, you're welcome. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:15, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm Yunshui. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Violet Chachki have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=800174706 here]. Yunshui 雲 水 22:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I accidentally reverted a vandal's edit to another vandal's edit, oops. Simplexity22 (talk) 22:43, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Shit, sorry about that - I must have hit the revert in igloo a fraction of a second after you made your changes. I do apologise for the automated warning; not aimed at you in the slightest. Yunshui 雲 水 22:47, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries, thanks for protecting the page! Simplexity22 (talk) 22:48, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I live to serve (*doffs hat*) Yunshui 雲 水 22:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Australia tour of India 2017
Just a friendly heads up on Australia tour of India 2017. I declined your A1 speedy request because the context is very clear with a simple google search, so the article does not meet the requirements.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  03:38, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. My bad, I should have given more thought after removing the copyvio. Simplexity22 (talk) 03:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Nice catch
It looks like Cluebot didn't catch the first of two vandalism edits to Chic, so we were reverting to a revision that wasn't entirely clean. I usually spot those pretty quickly, but I might have been a little caught up in my masala chai this time. dalahäst (let's talk!) 07:10, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Ha, thanks! Simplexity22 (talk) 07:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
 * The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: 
 * On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
 * Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Rollback
Hello you recently performed a rollback on Gus Worland in the future please check that no other Serious BLP issues remain. There were some pretty bad ones on that article...

--Cameron11598 (Talk) 18:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, my bad. I usually look for stuff like that, but I missed it for some reason on that page, sorry! Simplexity22 (talk) 21:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Piediepew
Wow, you guys are fast lol Piediepew (talk) 03:31, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Was just joking sorry man. Piediepew (talk) 03:32, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Hehe, thanks! Simplexity22 (talk) 02:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

phigknotpig
Hello! Responding to your msg on my talk page re: reverts to the False positive paradox page. Could I get some clarification on how I could improve my edit summary? I read over the Help:Edit summary page. Hope I wasn't rude but upon reflection maybe I was? Thanks! phigknotpig (talk) 18:07, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry, my bad. I somehow didn't notice your explanation in your edit summary, so I thought you were just blanking content. I've reverted my edit to your version. Simplexity22 (talk) 18:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

wikipedia user
hes really fast. is he even a real person? 2601:243:1401:4754:F1A1:EDD:60B5:3604 (talk) 04:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)me
 * Yes. Simplexity22 (talk) 04:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Pharien
Sandbox mode? What the heck is that? That sounds fun!!!!! Can other people see it? I mostly just mess with my school's page then fix it. (However there was a whole issue where I changed too much and some mod blocked me, so I couldn't fix it) But this sandbox thing sounds cool — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pharien (talk • contribs)
 * Yep, you can mess around (within reason) here or here... and yes, other people can see it. Simplexity22 (talk) 00:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Rent Guarantee Insurance
You recently removed an addition to a page I amended for rent guarantee info. What gives? How am I supposed to offer that information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.26.159 (talk) 01:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Not adding spam links would be a good start. Simplexity22 (talk) 01:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Blade Runner 2049
Humm... Hasn't been released yet. Where's the plot from? Jim1138 (talk) 04:04, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Sneak preview according to this ES. Jim1138 (talk) 04:06, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hmm, well according to the article, it has "premiered on October 3, 2017 at the Dolby Theater", though it hasn't been released to other theatres. It does seem a bit odd though... Simplexity22 (talk) 04:12, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Experimental Group
You removed the categories I started listing for the experimental group, a hospitality group I would like to create a page for to list their locations. How can I create this page without being "undoed" :)

17:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frenchtraveler (talk • contribs)
 * Please read External links and Your first article. With all due respect, creating a page with a list of keywords, followed by a link doesn't look like you're trying to create an article, but rather are trying to promote a website. If you really do want to create an article, you shouldn't override an existing redirect, maybe create Experimental Group (company), or if you're unable to do so, submit an article for review via WP:AFC. Simplexity22 (talk) 17:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Ok, great, will do. I'm trying to put down the skeleton of the article and then fill it up as I write it but using sandbox will allow me to push online a full story. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frenchtraveler (talk • contribs) 17:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see those "keywords" were actually section headers, my bad. Thanks for contributing! Simplexity22 (talk) 18:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Bloodhound677
Sorry mate! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bloodhound677 (talk • contribs) Sorry. I thought people must know that Thomas Hobbes is not from Calvin and Hobbes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.96.96.214 (talk) 23:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
 * Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
 * The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

A barnstar for you!

 * Much appreciated, thank you. Simplexity22 (talk) 03:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vnziszdncoanfsnovvjmnfvozs (talk • contribs) 23:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

142.204.244.69
John River and his management team do not approve of this content being posted and/or shared on wikipedia. This explanation will be reflected in the edit summary. Please do not re-add any other information.

(142.204.244.69 (talk) 20:13, 22 November 2017 (UTC))

John River Team

Thanks, can you help further?
Thanks for this revert on Ted Kennedy. Can you also revert this edit? I tried, but the bot identified my revert as "potentially unconstructive". 32.218.44.35 (talk) 04:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, edit conflict. Thanks. 32.218.44.35 (talk) 04:22, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem, thanks to you as well. Simplexity22 (talk) 04:22, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Dalmatian
Hello, prior to moving the page Dalmatian (dog breed) did you notice a discussion about the page's name on the talk page? Kind regards, Cavalryman V31 (talk) 19:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC).
 * No, I did not. I should have checked more closely, sorry.


 * In any case, I think a new WP:RM discussion would be appropriate at this point, since the discussion seems to contradict the consensus found at the previous RM. Simplexity22 (talk) 22:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Note
See User:Andy M. Wang/pageswap.js.Regards:) Winged Blades Godric 09:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Simplexity22 (talk) 03:08, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Wrongful editings
IM sorry I genuinely and whole heartedly believed I was inserting the correct information. I am terribly sorry and will check my facts better. Dooggoo135161 (talk) 20:58, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Teen Titans Go! was confirmed to have a fifth season on the 28th of last month. You can look for it here: http://tombcartoonmonkeyskeleton.blogspot.nl/2017/09/work-around-town.html User:Somematchyguy19 (talk) 23:47, 3 December 2017 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.79.190.106 (talk)

SRy G4yl0rd333 (talk) 00:53, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Outreach and Invitations:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
 * Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
 * If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: . Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive
 * A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
 * Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. —  TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 
 * ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
 * The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Years new page backlog drive
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:


 * The total number of reviews completed for the month.
 * The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Sam Cooke
Greetings. Thanks for the vandalism reversion and forceful warning @ Sam Cooke. If the miscreant repeats, some sort of banning seems mandatory. Regards Tapered (talk) 09:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, no problem. The user can be reported to WP:AIV if they continue. Simplexity22 (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, . Simplexity22 (talk) 15:10, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

WP:RFBOT
Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A this log].
 * Don't start running until the flag is set. A different bureaucrat then me needs to do it since I was your bot approver. —  xaosflux  Talk 12:50, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: New Year Backlog Drive results:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
 * We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!
 * We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
 * Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

142.167.170.208
this says that Labrador retriever are from UK and canada thats wrong I'm from Newfoundland and Labrador they are from Newfoundland canada only not UK they were breed from st John's water dog — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.170.208 (talk • contribs)
 * Hi, I'd recommend bringing this up on the article's talk page. Simplexity22 (talk) 16:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanking for Editing
Thank you for editing my Page, can you kindly reviewed Page created by me Khudgarz  if it is as per wikipidea rules and if not please guide me for future editing. SanaNawaz (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Your article seems good to me,, next steps would be to add more references to reliable and independent sources, and expanding the article, if possible. Simplexity22 (talk) 22:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! ACTRIAL:
 * ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing
 * Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking  place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
 * While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.