User talk:Simplicityinstinct


 * }

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Goldbach's conjecture has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://simplicityinstinct.weebly.com/uploads/4/7/3/3/4733019/goldbachsconjectureprimenumberchannels.pdf, http://simplicityinstinct.weebly.com/uploads/4/7/3/3/4733019/completeproject.pdf, http://simplicityinstinct.weebly.com/uploads/4/7/3/3/4733019/goldbachconjecturebands.pdf. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:04, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Simplicity Instinct, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Please do not remove tags to articles you've created. --moreno oso (talk) 04:20, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Simplicity Instinct, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. --moreno oso (talk) 04:25, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —  Jeff G. ツ  04:55, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Simplicity Instinct. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. —  Jeff G. ツ  04:56, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Simplicity Instinct


The article Simplicity Instinct has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTPAPER, consists entirely of original research. Existing references were to other Wikipedia articles, which is not acceptable (WP should not be self-referential). Final two references (which are currently external links) link to a blog, which would not be considered a reliable source.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  elektrik SHOOS  06:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this :
 * 1) You may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization.
 * 2) Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guideline to avoid editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations.The article in question is Simplicity Instinct. Thank you.  elektrik SHOOS  06:45, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a few moments to create a new account with a username that represents only you. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may ask for a review of this username block by adding below this notice the text. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)