User talk:SimplyBatman22

Welcome!
Hello, SimplyBatman22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  KDTW Flyer  ( talk ) 14:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com as a source
Hi SimplyBatman22. I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You should consider reviewing WP:BLP carefully regardless. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 20:29, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Chris Stuckmann (YouTube personality) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Stuckmann (YouTube personality) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chris Stuckmann (YouTube personality) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 4) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 4), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Robert G. (talk) 17:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

== Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 4) (September 2) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MassiveYR was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 4) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_Good_Mythical_Morning_episodes_(season_4) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MassiveYR&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_Good_Mythical_Morning_episodes_(season_4) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

M assiveYR  ♠  13:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 1)


The article List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 1) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "non notable spinoff, barely expands from the article"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wumbolo (talk) 12:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 2)


The article List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 2) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "per proposed deletion of 'List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 2)': non notable unsourced"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wumbolo (talk) 20:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 3)


The article List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 3) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "per proposed deletion of 'List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 2)': non notable unsourced"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wumbolo (talk) 20:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 5)


The article List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 5) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "per proposed deletion of 'List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 2)': non notable unsourced"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wumbolo (talk) 20:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 6)


The article List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 6) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "per proposed deletion of 'List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 2)': non notable unsourced"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wumbolo (talk) 20:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 7)


The article List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 7) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "per proposed deletion of 'List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 2)': non notable unsourced"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wumbolo (talk) 20:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Good Mythical Morning episodes


The article List of Good Mythical Morning episodes has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced OR/trivia. Episode lists make sense for e.g. TV series, where each episode receives coverage and has noteworthy features. But this makes no sense as a separate article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 02:49, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, I'm Tornado chaser. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Good Mythical Morning, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tornado chaser (talk) 01:35, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Citations to YouTube
I noticed you've added a few citations to a YouTube channel in film reception sections. We don't cite reviews from the general public like this. Per MOS:FILM, we generally cite professional critics who are published in reliable sources, though we do sometimes make exceptions for experts, such as famous scientists who critique the scientific aspects of films. If this is your own YouTube channel, you should further be aware that advertising it on Wikipedia like this is generally not allowed; it is considered a form of spamming. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 16:44, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Conflict of interest policy
Hello, SimplyBatman22. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 18:01, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ronz (talk) 04:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Caillou Pettis (film director)


A tag has been placed on Caillou Pettis (film director), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 4) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 4), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daily Film Fix


A tag has been placed on Daily Film Fix requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. red dogsix (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Good Mythical Morning episodes (season 4)


Hello, SimplyBatman22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Good Mythical Morning episodes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of films with a 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 21:18, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Stuckmann (May 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Etothepi was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Stuckmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chris Stuckmann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Chris_Stuckmann Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Etothepi&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Chris_Stuckmann reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

etothepi 👽 (u)&bull;(t) 14:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Stuckmann has been accepted
 Chris Stuckmann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Atlantic306 (talk) 20:41, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Chris_Stuckmann help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Draft:Caillou Pettis
Hi, don't think he qualifies for an article at present as 4,500 subscribers is not many compared to Stuckmann who has 1.2 million, and web series are not considered very notable, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 11:19, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Please also note my comments on your draft article. I see above that in 2017 it was recommended for deletion. It lacks secondary sources that establish notability of the subject - his own website and Facebook page for a proposed film are not considered Reliable Sources for this purpose. The article also lacks basic bio information - about family, siblings, education. I agree with Atlantic306 in saying it does not appear Pettis qualifies as a notable figure. Sources are weak. Do keep working on subjects but this is supposed to reflect established figures, not people trying to make a name for themselves on Wikipedia. Parkwells (talk) 21:55, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Caillou Pettis


A tag has been placed on Caillou Pettis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yeenosaurus  (talk) 🍁 23:28, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Chris Stuckmann
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 04:07, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Good Mythical Morning episodes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Good Mythical Morning episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Good Mythical Morning episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)