User talk:Simpsonguy1987

Welcome
Hello, Simpsonguy1987, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Pulp Fiction have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive 01:18, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

#1 movies
Hi Simpsonguy1987!

You have been posting a lot of awesome data on #1 movies -- I am currently doing a project about #1 movies and would be interested to get some information about the data you are posting, how far back in time you are going to go, and things like that. Please get in touch with me, preferably per email -- my email is wovenstrap@gmail.com. Thanks so much!Priceyeah (talk) 05:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of 2012 box office number-one films in Canada


The article List of 2012 box office number-one films in Canada has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unless the creator can show us that he has a working time machine, none of this information belongs on Wikipedia at this time.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of 2012 box office number-one films in Canada


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as List of 2012 box office number-one films in Canada, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited List of 2006 box office number-one films in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Invincible (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13
Hi. When you recently edited List of cult films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Say Anything (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Frankenstein (1994 film), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rob Banzai (talk) 13:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of films Roger Ebert gave Zero Stars for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of films Roger Ebert gave Zero Stars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of films Roger Ebert gave Zero Stars until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 01:18, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to 1999 in film. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 17:50, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sybil Danning. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 17:55, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Underworld (film series), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 16:41, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

List of cult films
Stop adding content to this article with no references. All such additions will be deleted. ---  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive  02:03, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Treehouse of Horror III, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cresix (talk) 03:11, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to wikiFeed
Hello Simpsonguy1987,

I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Wikipedia editors find interesting content to contribute to Wikipedia. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Wikipedia editing. We have created a tool, called wikiFeed, that allows you to specify Twitter and/or RSS feeds from news sources that are interesting to you. wikiFeed then helps you make connections between those feeds and Wikipedia articles. We believe that using this tool may be a lot of fun, and may help you come up with some ideas on how to contribute to Wikipedia in ways that interest you. Please participate! To do so, complete this survey and follow this link to our website. Once you're there, click the "create an account" link to get started.

For more information about wikiFeed, visit our project page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at wikifeedcc@gmail.com. We appreciate your time and hope you enjoy playing with wikiFeed!

Thanks! WorldsApart (talk) 21:13, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of cult films. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  The Old Jacobite The '45  02:23, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of cult films. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  The Old Jacobite The '45  01:22, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of incomplete or partially lost films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Happy Birthday to Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

List of cult films (again)
The warnings above notwithstanding, the work you have done on this article in recent months has been great. I know I have gotten on your case in the past, but I wanted to say that your recent work is appreciated. Let me know if I can ever be of assistance. --- The Old Jacobite The '45  03:57, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Zack Snyder, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MarnetteD | Talk 03:35, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Angel Heart. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MarnetteD | Talk 03:42, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of vigilantes in popular culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huntress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

List of Cult Films
Your latest additions to list of cult films cite an article on Bloody Disgusting that doesn't mention them. Maybe you pasted in the wrong URL? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:41, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Expendables 3. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  STATic  message me!  20:56, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=582261794 your edit] to Eliza Dushku may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:59, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Eliza Patricia Dushku ;

Disambiguation link notification for January 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of cult films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Final Countdown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=592586424 your edit] to Lara Croft: Tomb Raider may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:56, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * opening record for a film featuring a female protagonist ($42.3) million for Scary Movie as well as the opening record for a video game adaptation ($31 million for ''[[Pokémon: The First

Disambiguation link notification for February 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of 1995 box office number-one films in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=603394585 your edit] to Militia movement may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:16, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * *2011 Georgia terrorist plot

Reference Errors on 6 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
 * On the List of vigilantes in popular culture page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=607405021 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F607405021%7CList of vigilantes in popular culture%5D%5D Ask for help])

June 2014
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Van Helsing (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 13:45, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=615837804 your edit] to List of cult films may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * * Red Dawn
 * * Robocop cite web| first=Alasdair| last=Stewart|title=Cult Film Club – Robocop|http://geeksyndicate.co.uk/
 * * Shoot 'Em Up cite web|last=Tookey's|first=Chris|title=Shoot 'Em Up Review by Chris Tookey|http://www.movie-film-
 * }

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=617253186 your edit] to Shoot 'Em Up (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * at the box office. Although it has in recent years it has become a cult film
 * * Robocop
 * * Resident Evil and its sequels cite web| last=Schedeen| first=Jesse| work=IGN| http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/01/13/underworld-
 * * Robocop cite web| first=Alasdair| last=Stewart|title=Cult Film Club – Robocop|http://geeksyndicate.co.uk/
 * * Underworld and its sequels
 * * Resident Evil and its sequels cite web| last=Schedeen| first=Jesse| work=IGN| http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/01/13/underworld-
 * * Robocop cite web| first=Alasdair| last=Stewart|title=Cult Film Club – Robocop|http://geeksyndicate.co.uk/
 * * Underworld and its sequels cite web|last=Schedeen|first=Jeese|work=IGN| url = http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/01/13/
 * }

source
I saw that you created the early pages of List of box office number-one films in the United States, I noticed one thing, on List of 1977 box office number-one films in the United States it says that The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh reached number one on two weekends, now I really want to know were you got the source from because I need to know the Pooh's movie box office, I will appreciate very much if you can help me with an answer --DCF94 (talk) 02:22, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Willis Tower ‎. McGeddon (talk) 13:30, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of cult films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Black Cauldron. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Mummy Returns. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Twin films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Mummy (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Divergent (novel), you may be blocked from editing. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  02:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Affirmative action, you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 11:49, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of cult films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Death Wish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ghost in the Shell (1995 film). Opencooper (talk) 08:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Third-wave feminism, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 01:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Janet Reno, you may be blocked from editing. Nthep (talk) 12:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Suicide Squad (film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump.  General Ization  Talk   02:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, I'm Mediatech492. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of teetotalers have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mediatech492 (talk) 04:20, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cuckquean. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 02:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shooting of Kathryn Steinle, you may be blocked from editing.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 05:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of 1971 box office number-one films in the United States for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of 1971 box office number-one films in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of 1971 box office number-one films in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Addition of incorrect box-office data
There is currently a discussion at Articles for deletion/List of 1971 box office number-one films in the United States regarding a set of articles you have created. It has come to our attention that the data is fake. Since you created these articles would you please join the discussion and tell us where you sourced the data from? Betty Logan (talk) 12:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * There is also a discussion at WP:ANI regarding your activity. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 12:53, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 19:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for an indefinite period of time for disruptive editing
It looks like we are going to have to nuke 20 articles you started for obviously bad data. I've also checked and found that the bulk of your edits, at least recently, have bordered from factually questionable to BLP violation. I'm not sure what you are here for, but it isn't to improve the encyclopedia. Your stealth vandalism did manage to slide under the radar for a remarkable period of time, but I'm confident we will be watching those topics more closely now. With that in mind, I am blocking you for an indefinite period of time.

I would recommend any reviewing admin take a look at your deleted contribs and recent editing before considering any review. If you decide you want to appeal this block, you should follow the advice found at WP:GAB. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 19:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)