User talk:Sindhian

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

disruption Warning
Your recent post to the Administrator's Noticeboard was in poor taste. You followed the discussion at dab's talk page, where your 3RR report was broken down and analysed, and found to be invalid. After review by multiple administrators and after the orignial blocking admin reversed his decision, you continued to pursue this by posting to AN (with no mention of previous discusison). This is deceptive and disruptive. Please do not engage in this type of behavior again. Thanks! Chris lk02  Chris Kreider 18:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

This was my first time reporting a 3RR violations and apperently I made a mistake in terms of taking diffs from the Article history page. But why am I blocked ? Sindhian (talk) 22:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to the Administrator's Noticeboard removed several other comments. While this probably wasn't your intention, please remember to preview your edits. Exarion (talk) 23:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This is your 2nd warning for disruption. Please put down the stick and step away from horse corpse. Thanks!  Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 01:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Blocked again
I have re-blocked you (48h this time) for continued disruptive editing, edit-warring, block shopping on WP:ANI and general disruptive POV-pushing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:38, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

1. For the charge of disruptive editing is concerned, this is completely wrong. Please look into my history. I always use the talk pages before making any changes to the Article and invite editors with opposite POV to discuss the issue. So I don't understand the case of disruptive editing. 2.I have not engaged in any edit warring. Please site any incidance. 3. Block shopping on WP:ANI. I made a mistake in understanding what is 3RR and how to identify and cite the reverts due to my inexperience and since it was my first reporting of 3RR, I realized my mistake and apologized. The next seperate issue I wanted to highlight is about rude,abusive and threatening behaviour of Dbachmann. . I was feeeling that I was not able to express by complaint properly so I created another thread since the earlier one was closed and cited proof of abusive and threatening behaviour. After I was warned not push it further I agreed rest the case and walk away. So there is no point of Block shopping since in my next complaint i wasn't asking for a block but just pointing to an unacceptable behaviour.

Obviously Dbachmann has a lot of friends in the Admin notice board who came to support his side and got me banned. Please review.


 * I agree this looks really unfair and bad. The user is being blocked for trying to report 3RR for an admin? That's so silly. A user should not be blocked for that, I had a look at it and it was an honest mistake. futurebird (talk) 14:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Please make sure you understand the entire situation before you jump in and start throwing accusations around. This situation has been reviewed by several independant edtiors.  He was not blocked for his 3RR report, he was blocked for having a vendetta against an editor and refusing to drop it after several editors reviewed the situation and saw nothing wrong.  Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 15:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * There are some serious reasons for concern here. Please see Talk:Hinduism. Wikidās ॐ 16:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * And please see the full discussion of this block at WP:AN. I'm not a "block-happy" admin by any stretch of the imagination, but disruptive editing and forum shopping is not acceptable. To Sindhian: If you find yourself in a conflict with another editor in the future, please read WP:Dispute resolution and avail yourself of one of those options.  Thank you and good luck. — Satori Son 18:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Per No legal threats, would you like to revise your unblock request? Yuo really need to follow Chris's advice here. Kevin (talk) 01:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I've changed the block to indef per WP:NLT; if he retracts the threat, I'm okay with reducing the block duration. Krakatoa  Katie  01:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

.

After consultation with the blocking admin, I have reduced your block to "time served", i.e. a little more than the original 48 hours, as the apparent legal threat has been retracted and was probably not a serious one in the first place. The reasons for your original block still stand though. This means you are now again free to edit, but please do keep in mind that a change of behaviour is expected of you, or you will very likely find yourself blocked again pretty soon. Users whose activities on Wikipedia are focussed on promoting a particular political or ideological viewpoint regarding some national, ethnic or religious group are not welcome on this project, and any disruption resulting from such editing will not be tolerated. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:43, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 07:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
hi, I am with you people for contributing in "Orissa communal violence" and will follow you against the opponent people's work here

Please do one favour the same persons who are removing your words from the "Orissa communal violence" are removing my words from "arundhati_roy" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arundhati_Roy and "sanddep_pandey" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandeep_Pandey  who are giving frequently Anti india ,Anti Hindu, pro pakistani and pro terrorists statements and statements favoring kashmiri Separatists in public.This is tarnishing over country's image in the world Please help me out. you are free to take my help in any such issues. Raulmisir (talk) 21:14, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Indian Religions article
Hello Brother. Currently some POV users such are reverting changes made by Nexxt 1, who is imputing completely referenced material that Hinduism is the world's most ancient religion, and other material. The POV users are disrupting his changes. Would you please be able to step in and take the side of user Nexxt 1? Thanks. - Angle reflection —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angle reflection (talk • contribs) 21:30, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)