User talk:Sinevik

Sinevik, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

March 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hugo Lloris, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. QED 237  (talk)  17:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Olcan Adın, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. QED 237  (talk)  20:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Olcan Adın with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jim1138 (talk) 21:15, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Radamel Falcao. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:01, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Hamit Altıntop. QED 237  (talk)  22:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Emre Can Coşkun, with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 18:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Arda Turan. QED 237  (talk)  10:38, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! QED 237  (talk)  10:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for repeated removal of content and unsourced changes. There are many warnings on your talk page that explain that unexplained blanking is disruptive, yet it has continued unabated. When the block expires please ensure that you are willing to discuss your edits with others when concerns are raised - it would also be helpful if you would, at the very least, include an edit summary when removing or changing content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:53, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Olcan Adın, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. QED 237  (talk)  15:04, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Aurélien Chedjou, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. QED 237  (talk)  21:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

STOP VANDALISM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mogumogu40 (talk • contribs) 22:19, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for all of the same reasons that led to your first block (i.e. unsourced changes, unexplained blanking, and zero communication). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:42, 12 May 2014 (UTC)