User talk:SinghIsFxing

Unblock
SinghIsFxing (talk) 13:14, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Discussion of Links and proofs of bad behaviour for abusive checkuser on this account
In view of the requirement for compulsory discussion of the checkuser block on the local wiki before my complaint is filed to ArbCom, I am requesting that you discuss this issue here and provide me the links and bad behaviour for this account requiring you to run a Checkuser scan on my account, and also the finding of the checkuse scan. This is in terms of "In case of abusive use of the tool, the Steward or the editor with the CheckUser privilege will immediately have their access r emoved. This will in particular happen if checks are done routinely on editors without a serious motive to do so (links and proofs of bad behavior should be provided)." SinghIsFxing (talk) 00:44, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I checked your account after it came up as a strong technical match in a check on "Lord Alan B'stard". I have no COI with Beutler. This will be my only response here. I am happy to answer any queries from ombudspeople, arbitrators, or other functionaries in venues more suitable for discussions involving private evidence. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Kindly discuss my Concerns about Conflict of Interest editing / blocking for Paid Editors
in the specific context of assisting me to properly file my complaint to Arbcom concerning misuse of Checkuser tools on this local wiki, I am requesting you to clarify the following seemingly coordinated curious actions of yourself and User:BINK Robin a declared paid editor acting for Beutler Ink concerning Draft:Monolith Inc. . I find it curious that within 30 mins of my account block by you, the paid editor restores (only citing my account block) 2 removals I made at Draft:Monolith Inc. and which I had noted were from paid news sources, that is to say paid unreliable news sources based on Press Releases.`I have researched that such press release news sources (often accused of bad / partisan journalism) seem to be rampantly used by Beutler Ink to place their client's articles in Wikipedia.

FYI, both the "news" sources whose contents I removed have a common ownership and were being used by Beitler Ink to support each other. SinghIsFxing (talk) 02:22, 15 December 2022 (UTC)


 * You can contact the Arbitration Committee to discuss misuse of the Checkuser tool using this link.
 * You can contact the Ombuds Commission to discuss violations of the Privacy Policy using this link.
 * I hope this helps. SQL Query Me!  02:37, 15 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up. Howver, I am supposed to make my complaint to Arbcom after prior discussion on the local wiki, which is the prerequsite to the Arbcom complaint. SinghIsFxing (talk) 02:40, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. GeneralNotability (talk) 03:48, 19 December 2022 (UTC)