User talk:SinhalaPOWEr

Mohideen
Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. Could you please supply some references in your Mohideen to justify the allegations there? Zoe 22:49, September 5, 2005 (UTC)

Enabling_complex_text_support_for_Indic_scripts
Hi,

I see you've updated the fonts list on this page - thanks! I was wondering if you have more information on the status of Sinhala support on computers? As far as I'm aware very few rendering engines support it at the moment and any clarification would be appreciated. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 23:35, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Hi sukh. Unlike tamil, sinhala is not supported by arial unicode or other standard fonts. Therefore it is necessary to download a font and tweak with your settings to get it running. Most sinhala webpages use a non unicode font called kottu (iso 8859-1). This is done by substituting "a" with sinhala "ayanna" and so on. Rendering is pretty okay with most browsers, but IE tends to insert blanks between letters when you try to select words. Unicode fonts are less common although the people at sinhala wikipedia and the SL government try to use them.

Rendering works fine on firefox, although the fonts appear rough. However, you can only see gibberish on the firefox/ie title pages. Yahoo search on sinhala words also works fine although google seems to have problems from time to time.

I know very little about unicode. Sorry I cannot contribute more. But if you contact one of these people at and  they would be able to help you out. One of the problems with most unicode fonts that I've used is the lack of some important letters like "pili" (vowel derivatives added to consonants to make them sound different). Hope this helps.

Image:LTTEAmpara.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LTTEAmpara.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 11:53, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Childsoldiers.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Childsoldiers.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 11:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Ranilbush.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ranilbush.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 11:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Premadasa1.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Premadasa1.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 11:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Z P04-Caeser1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Z P04-Caeser1.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 11:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of towns in Sri Lanka
List of towns in Sri Lanka, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of towns in Sri Lanka satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/List of towns in Sri Lanka and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of List of towns in Sri Lanka during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rtphokie 00:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Asian Tribune


The article Asian Tribune has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:24, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Asian Tribune


A tag has been placed on Asian Tribune requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Atsme 💬 📧 13:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)