User talk:Sino-Malay

Welcome!
Welcome!

Hello, Sino-Malay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Chipmunkdavis (talk) 02:29, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

penis removal article
I am sure you will be duly informed that people are trying to ressurect the list at Penis removal. If the editor complains on the talk page, we may need to put this up to a vote again.Bunser (talk) 02:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 15:15, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

And I point out once more that none of us were involved in vote stacking, block evasion, so what was the rationale for the block? Why would I open another account to edit in a totally different topic area when I am not blocked and don't need to submit multiple votes?Sino-Malay (talk) 19:52, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

See -SOCK and SOCK, according to these rules, even if they were my sock accounts, I still would not have been blocked. And I mentioned above that I use a proxy, they are not my accounts, someone else (or several people) signed in on the same proxy.Sino-Malay (talk) 20:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

One unblock request at a time please - and be patient as it may take several days to receive a response. B music  ian  03:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that, I assumed that Beajhure was someone else far away (speaking iof cyberspace). I share this computer with other people (roomates), and I didn't realize they might be editing wikipedia with it. I never talked to them about my wikipedia activities, and they might have looked into my internet history and obtained the proxy as well as my computer. I will check on them to see if one of them did it.Sino-Malay (talk) 03:39, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Actually I know who Beajhure is already since I saw him using the computer.Sino-Malay (talk) 03:52, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

I also point out again, no evidence of abuse (multiple voting, concensus shifting, block evasion), plus the policy on open proxies does not say that you get blocked for using an open proxy. It says you can keep using them until the proxy gets blocked.Sino-Malay (talk) 04:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * They live with you, you all use the same computer, all edit Wikipedia... and you just now figured all that out? Hers fold  (t/a/c) 04:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't watch over my computer or my relatives 24/7, and I only I have one computer in my house... I promise to ban Beajhure from using the computer for one month. I am not a frequent editor of wikipedia, by the way, but I do read it. The only reason I came across the message that I was blocked, was because it was left on my talk page (it makes the big orange banner come up when you visit wiki). I wasn't going to do any editing and would not have even noticed I was blocked if he hadn't left the message.Sino-Malay (talk) 04:16, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

"abuse"
To the reviewing admin, whether you believe I am telling the truth that I am not the sockmaster of the other three accounts, or you think I'm a big liar and those other accounts (who edited totally different topics and were created months after my accounts was created) are mine, that has no bearing at all on the block, since (If i am the sockmaster and a liar) owning multiple accounts is allowed according to policy if they don't abuse it, secondly, (If I am telling the truth and the other accounts are not mine), multiple users are allowed to edit from the same computer as long as they steer clear of articles which the other user edits.

I was not blocked for owning different accounts, Tnxman32 explicitly stated "Abusing multiple accounts" in the block summary. If those accounts are my socks and I am a liar, I have still acted entirely according to wikipedia rules and haven't acommited any abuse at all, since I #1 I haven't edited the same articles with different accounts, #2, I have never tried to evade a block, and I never received any blocks before, #3, I have never used the "socks" to vote multiple times and change concensus. #4 the blocking admin, Tnxman307 in his own words regarding another sockmaster- "Be that as it may, I still don't see abuse of multiple accounts. It looks to me like one account was abandoned and the other started up. Perhaps they forgot their password, or wanted a new name. Absent any consensus stacking, etc. I don't there's any action to take here. "

Txnman307 failed to mention or explain what "abuse" I was committing- I didn't do any vote stacking, none of the accounts edited at the same time, if you assumed we were socks and looked at our contribution histories you would think that Nufaiyrs, Sehidhen, and me (Sino-Malay) "abandoned" the account due to our infrequent editing. Txnman32 refused to ban another user for sockpuppeting and vandalizing the same article with both socks, but he bans me for doing the exact opposite.

Sino-Malay's edit history

Nufaiyrs edit history

Sehidhen's edit history

Beajhure's edit history

It is exactly because none of these accounts are vandals, that I'm not lying about them not being me. Since Nufaiyrs has actually contributed constructive, sourced edits, if I would lie, I would gladly take credit for his contributions and say he is my sock. The Sehidhen and Beajhure accounts also show no vandalism or signs of abuse.

Sino-Malay (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Three point expalanation of unblock request
And if you just skim over my explanation above and then decline, please consider these three points, essentially a simplified explanation of the unblock request-


 * 1) 1 I was blocked for "abusing" multiple accounts. What abuse? Did I use another account to evade a previous block or double vote or edit the same article? No, Tnxman307 just blocked all of us since all the accounts were registered from the same computer. per SOCK different users sharing the same ipaddress/network/computer is allowed. He gave no evidence for abuse.

All of our block histories were clean before this happened- n
 * 1) 2- Why would I use the same proxy to open multiple accounts and edit totally different articles for no reason at all? If I wanted to sock, I would use different proxies for different accounts. If you want me to easily find another free proxy I will give you the link to it if you request.


 * 1) 3- None of us edited the same articles at all.Sino-Malay (talk) 22:08, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

,
 * Your block has expired. If you are still unable to edit, please post the message you see here. TN X Man  14:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)