User talk:Sinology

Brief Introduction Of New Sinology
A template has been added to the article Brief Introduction Of New Sinology, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. -- Finngall  talk  17:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Please don't paste your essays to Wikipedia; Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought or research. Thank you. - Mike Rosoft 18:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Similarly, don't create articles containing nothing but a link to your essay - this is not what Wikipedia is for, either. - Mike Rosoft 18:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Brief Introduction Of New Sinology, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Oli Filth 18:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Brief Introduction Of New Sinology, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Oli Filth 18:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Theory Of New Sinology. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Oli Filth 19:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC) in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

I have permanently blocked the account User:NewSinology as an abusive sockpuppet of yours; I am also extending your block to one week. Please wait until your block expires and don't attempt to edit using more sockpuppet accounts in the meantime; otherwise, your main account will be permanently blocked as well. In addition, please don't re-create a deleted article (or an article which is to be deleted via a deletion vote/discussion. You could have commented at the deletion discussion page; after it is deleted, you may argue for its undeletion at deletion review, but unless you can persuade the rest of the users that the article is not just your original essay (which Wikipedia does not serve for), the undeletion request won't succeed. - Mike Rosoft 16:24, 28 August 2007 (UTC)