User talk:Sinsen/Archive 1

Kindly Unblock my account!
Dear Editors and Moderators!

I accept I have continuously used sock puppets in earlier attempts till 2011. All I did because of my incomplete awareness about the wikipedia guideliness. I feel guilty for those doings.

But now on I really like to provide my useful contributions on Wikipedia. I was looking on to Wikipedia editing after a long gap of years. I thout my account has been permenantly blocked and so I created a new account User:Senthilsgsm and started providing my contributions. Later on I came to know from a moderator that my User:Sinsen itself can be and must be unblocked to avoid controversies. You can look at my contributions page on User:Senthilsgsm which were really apart from vandalism and they are with complete support of references.

I have created that new account recently only because I thought my original account Sinsen cannot be retrived. Liberally explaining, I forget the procedures of blocking, sockpuppet and all in these 4 years of time.

So kindly unblock my account User:Sinsen and delete that account. And please allow me to start working on User:Senthilsgsm.

Also, kindly review the reverted/deleted/redirected edits/pages which I created using User:Senthilsgsm and consider them to bring back.

Let me study the complete guideliness of Wikipedia and use my fullest support.

With Thanks and Regards -Senthil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Senthilsgsm (talk • contribs) 15:04, 24 November 2016 (UTC)


 * To my knowledge, there has been block evasion by at least two accounts more recently than 2011, namely Senthilsindia, which most recently made edits (now deleted) in 2014, and Senthilsgsm, which edited from March to November 2016. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:21, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your listening mr.watson. I apologise for past activities. The thing is I forgot my account password. Just now I put effort to recover my password and login with original account. Just created User:Senthilsgsm because of forgotten credentials of Sinsen and I thought the block was permanent and I can't be recovered.

Sorry for the inconvenience. Sinsen (talk) 16:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)


 * You blocked User:Senthilsgsm, so I'm asking you for help. Should we unblock this account? As far as I understand, the user was inactive for years and created that new account (User:Senthilsgsm) 7 months ago. Contributions really look OK.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I have had a look at the editing history of the accounts that I know of that have been used since 2011, and I have not seen a continuation of any of the problems which led to the original block. The worst I can see is limited competence in English. For example, this edit says "For constructing byepasses to Chithode and Gobi, public meetings were held, but due to limitations in World Bank funding, they withdrawn the byepass construction", and other edits include things such as the word "splitted", and the expression "a charm and pleasant town". There are also examples on this page, such as the use of the word "intimidating" in a context where it can scarcely mean that (and I am not sure what word was intended) and the statement "I created new account in the recent". I confess that I tend to regard such problems more seriously than many editors, because an editor who can't write English properly can leave a lot of articles looking very incompetent and amateurish to readers, which does not give a good impression of Wikipedia, and can at times even make it difficult to understand, and for that reason I am unwilling to unblock myself. However, the editor really does seem to have every intention of editing constructively, and not returning to the problematic editing that led to the original block, so if you are attach less importance than I do to the problems of competence in English, and wish to unblock, then I will not object. (To avoid any possible misunderstanding, I have no problem at all with non-native speakers who are competent at English editing, as for example yourself. On the contrary, I think the English language Wikipedia benefits enormously from having a range of editors from different ethnic and national backgrounds.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:36, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Low level of English competence can be a problem, but the level demonstrated by this user certainly does not warrant an indefinite block. So, I decided to unblock.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  16:19, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Vanjagenije and JamesBWatson for considering my unblock request at the earliest. I do thank you both for taking decision to unblock me! I will add my e-mail id in account preference and avoid further controversies afterwards. Let me continue my editing only through this account. And thank you Mr.Watson for your constructive comments about my language competence. Let me improve my skill level and contribute myself in a better way.Sinsen