User talk:Sint Maarten

April 2014
Hello, I'm John from Idegon. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Moscow, Idaho seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 23:54, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:John from Idegon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Keep your personal political ideologies on your userspace. You have no right to edit mine. My userpage is mine, as is everyone else's on Wikipedia. There is never any reason for you to edit it, much less use it as a forum for your political viewpoints. '' John from Idegon (talk) 15:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing; specifically, POV-pushing, user page/talk page vandalism, impersonation of other editors, and sockpuppetry. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Kinu  t/c 19:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of NOS Marine Forensics Program for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NOS Marine Forensics Program is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NOS Marine Forensics Program until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 19:55, 25 April 2014 (UTC)a

PLEASE UNBLOCK ME!
Hey guys,

I'm so sorry, but my younger brother got on my account because he was mad at me and started typing biased stuff so I would get blocked. Will you please unblock me? It used to be his account (you can see why in the next paragraph), so he knew the password; but now I've changed my password so he doesn't know it.

And as to the NOS Marine Forensics program, that wasn't written by me--well, it's kind of hard to explain, but my account was my younger brother's account first, and he wrote one article--The NOS Marine Forensics Program, in which I'm fairly sure there is plagiarism. Then he didn't feel like doing Wikipedia and gave his account to me because I wanted one but couldn't get one. That is because we share an email account, which he'd used to create this account, and since our email was already used for his account, I couldn't create my own account with our email address. So I really didn't write the NOS Marine Forensics Program. I'd have deleted it, but I don't think I can; at least I can't find a way to. I agree that it should be deleted; it is plagiarized.

And by the way the user Jagen de Vagen is not me, I promise. It's one of my siblings, and my younger brother got on Jagen de Vagen's account too because he was mad at him too--and he figured out Jagen de Vagen's password because Jagen had been giving him hints about it, seeing if he could guess it (Jagen's said he'll be more careful with his password from now on, as he sees how our younger brother will take advantage of that . We're both so sorry about the disturbance our brother's caused, and we've both changed our account passwords so it's not going to happen again.

Please consider unblocking both Jagen de Vagen and me. It wasn't our fault that our younger brother was angry with us and tried to get us blocked. We apologize for the inconvenience we've caused all you Wikipedians. I'm so sorry and I really hope I can get my account back so I can continue to do good work on Wikipedia.

Sint Maarten 21:00, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


 * "My brother did it!" is not a valid reason for unblocking. 172.56.19.241 (talk) 21:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Just wondering...why is "My brother did it" not a valid reason? I'm sorry to contradict you, but I really think that I should be unblocked because I couldn't help it that my younger brother did that.  I've apologized quite a few times...I don't know what else I can do to say I'm sorry about what's happened.  I've ensured it's not going to happen again. Sint Maarten 21:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


 * See WP:BROTHER, and WP:EBUR...maybe even WP:GOTHACKED the panda ₯’  22:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

NOS Marine Forensics Program Needs To Be Deleted!
Just letting you know... This is Sint Maarten, and if you've read the other things I've said on this talk page, you know that this used to be my younger brother's Wikipedia account, but he gave it to me after he got tired of using Wikipedia. While it was his account, he created NOS Marine Forensics Program and it is actually a plagiarized article. I can give you the web address of the site he copied it off of: http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/forensics.html  So after you've looked at that I think you'll see that this article really ought to be deleted. If I were unblocked, I'd post what I've just said on Articles for deletion/NOS Marine Forensics Program, but since I am blocked, I'll just say it in the only place I'm allowed to post--which is here. In all good faith, Sint Maarten 21:57, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NOS Marine Forensics Program


A tag has been placed on NOS Marine Forensics Program requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/forensics.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. John from Idegon (talk) 22:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NOS Marine Forensics Program


A tag has been placed on NOS Marine Forensics Program requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/forensics.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Yes, I know this page has already been posted for speedy deletion, but there was no notice of speedy deletion on the actual page NOS Marine Forensics Program, and User:John from Idegon posted the notice for speedy deletion over two months ago. Why isn't this article getting deleted?

Ventus Castellum (talk) 01:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)