User talk:Sintheg2

Go To my new talk page
Hi, if y'all want some more SNAKE, go to my new page or my new talk page. NewSintheg2 11:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)NEWSNAKE out

Thy Battlers
I have added a "" template to the article Thy Battlers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mattinbgn/talk 20:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Simon Cormie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mattinbgn/talk 20:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello Sintheg2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, they have helped improve Wikipedia and make it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:


 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~ ; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Where to ask a question, try the Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up!

Mattinbgn/talk 08:51, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Simon Cormie
Hi, Sintheg2. Firstly, I have left a welcome message for you above. Have a read of the links and let me know if you have any questions. Secondly, you can have the decision to delete the above article reviewed at Deletion review by following the steps listed there. Note that I am not an administrator and did not delete that article and I can't restore it. I must warn you that you would be unlikely to succeed. Thirdly, before remaking the article, please ensure it meets Wikipedia guidelines, in particular Notability (people). Once again if you have any questions about that guideline or any guideline please ask me for help or ask at Editor assistance for anothe view. As the article has been protected against re-creation you will need to work on it in your user pages. Let me know if you need help with this and I will do what I can. If you have remade the article and it meets Wikipedia guidelines, once again you can ask me or the people at Editor assistance for help in getting the article unprotected.

Lastly, I think it is unlikely that the subject will meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. It may be best to work on other topics included in Wikipedia instead, especially topics where you do not have a conflict of interest. I hope you stick around, trust me it is a lot of fun. Mattinbgn/talk 09:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Scott Powell, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mattinbgn/talk 10:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

vandalism
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ··coe l acan 10:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

edit: cool stop sign dude, it makes your warning almost seem threatening

-snake out- Sintheg2 11:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Sintheg2

RE: Vandalism
Damn straight this will be the last warning I will recieve for vandalism. Have a look at my posts. It is pure genius. Watch out when S(nake)InTheG(rass)2 is lurking.

WP:NPA
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

The Snake is Back!
That's right, watch out, the snake is lurking; Sintheg2 10:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Sintheg2

With regards to your comments on User talk:Crcar2:&#32;Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- VS talk 08:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

VS, please read what the snake posts, there was no attacking going on. I added my opinion, that's all. Sintheg2 11:40, 29 May 2007 (UTC)snake out, SNAKE

Unblock Me Please
I have been mistakenly linked to several users including ppk812 and Crcar2. My contributions should prove that I have not personally attacked anyone, but rather added some important information. If enough time is allowed, myself and ppk will properly source as much of the Mentone Grammar School page, and provide useful contributions elsewhere. I can't believe Crcar hasn't been blocked. He is the true troll, have a look at his/her talk page. He/she has three warnings stating they will be his/her only warning. Sintheg2 11:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC)SNAKE out