User talk:Siobhanhoffmann

Hi. I see that you undid my edit on the John Charmley page. Believe it or not, I am not some evil troll who hates Mr. Charmley, but merely a random Wikipedia volunteer. I see from your LinkedIn page that you work at the University of East Anglia with Mr. Charmley. This means you're an involved party (see Conflict of interest, and have to be extra-careful with additions. On the bright side, you probably have a bunch of good sources.  The article *is* unbalanced against Charmley at the moment, yes, but removing the weakly-sourced criticism with no sourced praise just makes the article even worse.  If you'd like to make the article better, can you find some published agreement / praise of Charmley by someone other than him?  Or him saying outright that the criticism against him is misplaced and not against his actual views?   Then you can quote that, and stick a reference to that afterward, and then you'll have improved the article.  More useful than your own personal opinion about how Americans are all wrong about Churchill. SnowFire (talk) 03:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Merger discussion for History (journal)
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;History (journal) &mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  15:00, 20 August 2015 (UTC)