User talk:Siolio

Conflict of interest
Hello Siolio. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Siolio. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:38, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gavin John Adams
Hello Siolio,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gavin John Adams for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:44, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

question
What is your connection with the book or author whose works you keep inserting. ? If it is your work, or the work of an associate, our rules arethat ypoou may only suggest it on the article talk page. See [WP:COI DGG ( talk ) 01:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

DGG My connection with the book is I read it at MIT as part of a history course. That is it. What is your personal issue with it? Because the reasons you have given for your erroneous editing it out are simply wrong. I have left a fuller response to your continued erroneous edit of that page on your talk page. The language and citation was put on that page 5 years ago (not by me) and you are incorrect to keep changing it. See my comments on your page. So quit. You are damaging the credibility of the article and your credibility as an editor.