User talk:Sionk/Archive 5

Artist Curator Paul Murnaghan
Thanks for your comments Sionk, as you can see I'm new to this. One of the main reasons that I put this artist's work up is that much of what he does is ethereal and happens outside the gallery / institution. It is hard to find references. I am a little confused about the robustness of links, I felt that linking to museums or galleries that I could find would be a solid reference. The internal Wiki links were just for added info for the reader and to support referenced writers credentials, should I remove these? I have listed the publications that I know of in their correct form (I hope), they are verifiable but I find magazine articles that I have read may not be on line. You mentioned independent articles, The Frieze article about a show that he curated (you may need to scroll down on the page) is readable on line and they are highly respected as you will know. Circa magazine has often written of his work but they require that you download a PDF and pay for it (hard times in arts in Ireland)but back issues can be cited, should I do this for other articles even if they cannot be read on line? After this last attempt I am at a bit of a loss for what to do, any suggestions?

Thanks, Nelson. Luckynelson (talk) 16:17, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Sionk,

Thanks again for your comments, I think that I have cited my online sources correctly and magazine/books references. In reference to your comment I wouldn't describe galleries as neutral (or entirely reliable) sources because they often have a vested interest in promoting the artist (their product) The gallery catalogue and critic that I referenced most is from a State Gallery with text from  an independent critic (who's credibility is their bread and butter), there was no work for sale or there are no gallery artists at this space (the lab)and really no vested interest, that is why I chose it. As far as I know this artist does not belong to any gallery and does not have product for sale, the work is mostly processed based, conceptual and often of and ethereal nature which tends to negate product. I totally understand your concerns but I must say it is hard to find much information on this artist in books written outside of an arts context and therefore they are often associated in some way with an institution. I presume the Frieze and Circa refs are ok? You mentioned in a previous comment not to reference inside Wikipedia, I see this done all the time in other articles, I am curious as to why you want me to avoid this practice as surely this information is valid. I am anxious to know if I am coming close to clearing this text (please specify problems if I am not). I feel the artist is valid and worth adding to Wikipedia, I must say that your process is admirably rigorous. Best wishes, Nelson. Luckynelson (talk) 16:52, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

The Farm Group
Hi there, I don't see why you have rejected the article for The Farm Group. There are hundreds of company articles on Wikipedia (such as the few listed below) which have nowhere near as much evidence to support their facts, as I have provided. Broadcast Magazine is a well known and respected provider of industry news and well adheres to Wikipedia's 'notability' requirements for companies requirements as an independant source of evidence. Also, I havent' just used Broadcast Magazine, I have also used Televisual Magazine (another widely recognised publication) as well as other sources for evidence. I think you have been a little harsh in your reviewing Aganlykesington (talk) 12:55, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grey_Global_Group http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_%26_Rubicam http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohn_%26_Wolfe

Teun Voeten Article
Hi, I have written you few weeks ago about this article that you declined http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Teun_Voetenbut it seems that you have modified your page and I cannot find any more the message I wrote you: have you kept it? Why you didn't reply? now, I have added more references including an interview with the BBC that should contribute to give to this person notability. Moreover another page that you complain for notability is this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunnel_People this page was approved by another editor that didn't find any problems in its notability standards, can you please tell me what's wrong so I can fix it? Furthermore I am a bit less busy for a couple of days and I want to take the occasion to fix these articles, so can you please reply me as soon as possible so I can fix them? thanks Ransfortstraat (talk) 16:40, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Apologies. I've been away. I'll take a look when I have a moment. Sionk (talk) 20:16, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for your help, I appreciate that! Ransfortstraat (talk) 16:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Edits to PowerMILL
Hi,

I have seen your recent edits to the PowerMILL article and was wondering why you consider a software release history to be non-encyclopedic material when they are included in many software articles on Wikipedia from MS Word to SolidWorks?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ash.raymond (talk • contribs) 16:04, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Shannon Campbell
Hi, Thanks for your feed back, one last question. If someone is mentioned in a wikipedia article is that not reason enough to have information about them? Shannon is mention twice for winning [King_of_the_Hammers] Thanks for your time Roballred (talk) 21:49, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Tom Tattoo, article not accepted, some reflections
Hi, I saw that the article about Tom Tattoo, Italian born tattoo artist, haas been not accepted. I just would like to say that there are some reasons for keeping this article on the Wiki's English version. Tom has started his tattoo artist career in the States, first in Seattle and then in New York where he got to work with artists such as Chris Garver and Sean Vasquez among others. He lives in Italy but every years he's twice in the States and partecipate to the NYCity Tattoo Convention since the first year. He's well know on the American scene (I've seen some others wikipedians have added articles from local magazines) and he has good professional and personal relationships with all the most important artists in the States and around the world. This is witnessed by two important awards: in 2007 the magazine Tattoo, issued a Special Edition for the Twentieth Anniversary and Tom Tattoo was one of the mentioned artists. In the same year, at the NYCtattoo Convention, Tom has received an award from the judges of the contests and the organization for The contributions to the art of tattooing. This means, to me, that Tom has gone through a long career with success, recognized not only in Italy and so he deserves a mention in the international Wiki version. Do you think it would help to quote the international publications or the Italian publications of international interest? Please, I'll work again on the article and I wish to have suggestion in order to write a right article. Thanks--Giulia Visci (talk) 16:01, 9 November 2012 (UTC) Hi and thank you so much for your help. I thought that Tattoo, the most selling and known tattoo magazine in the world, would had been a reliable source enough: to be mentioned in the 20th anniversary special edition is an award to Tom's career as well as it is athe award received in NYC, where the jury is usually made up with very well know tattoo artists, journalists, and people working in the tattoo world. If you think it would help I'll add some others Italian magazines. Would it?--Giulia Visci (talk) 09:49, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Lulubelle III
Hi Sionk. I'm looking for some advice on the rejection of Lulubelle III page. It looks like notability is the reason for refusal. The band have a BBC artist page http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/58572196-2792-4c66-a7f8-985753bc5d17 because they have been played twice this month on BBC national radio and once on BBC regional radio. Previous to this they have had airplay on BBC regional radio and Irish national radio. The BBC artists help pages suggest that being played on radio counts as notability. There are links in the article to all of this so I thought I had met the verifiability criteria. Any help in what I need to meet the criteria would be much appreciated. Thanks. Musicfan1812 (talk) 19:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Rejection for lack of citations
Hi, you recently rejected the following article en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Jonathan_D._Christenbury. This is the second decline I have received for this article and I would really love some feedback as to what parts of the article you found inadequately cited so that I can insert the appropriate citations.

Thank you, IvanB85 (talk) 21:53, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Services Union
Thank-you for reviewing my submission for The Services Union page.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/The_Services_Union

I am a little perplexed as to why this time my submission has been rejected (the other times I can absolutely see the reviewers point of view).

For clarification - (and it may be a lack of knowledge about Australian Unions and their structures perhaps) but The Services Union is one of the two Queensland Branches of the Australian Services Union- which is the National Office. This was made distict in my introduction. However, I am happy to clarify this further in the introduction for further review.

As for reliable sources - The Australian Trade Union Archives are the MAIN SOURCE of information about trade unions in Australia and the main source where people go in regards to finding out about Australian Trade Unions and their history. If you look at the website: http://www.atua.org.au/about.html  and read this passage on the ABOUT PAGE: Importance of ATUA "Prior to ATUA, there was no single access point from which scholars of Australian labour history could discover which trade unions existed in Australia since the advent of organised labour in the nineteenth century. In short, there was no comprehensive listing by union name.

Additionally, there was no matching historical context about the emergence, existence and industry focus of individual unions. Over time, unions have amalgamated, expanded, changed names or even ceased to exist as the industrial, legislative, political, technological and economic environments in which they operated changed. These changes are reflected in ATUA. Lastly, there has been no central, accessible point from which scholars could view existing knowledge regarding trade union and industrial bodies. There was no one resource detailing the location, quantity, contents and access conditions of archives created by unions since their formation over one hundred years ago."

You will see that this is the primary source to get historical information about Australian TUs.

I have used reliable sources such as newspapers as well. I find it hard to understand (perhaps you could clarify) why a page like this about Australian Fashion Designer Alex Perry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Perry with hardly any references is approved (and with Wikipaedia calling for people to refernce this page) and my page about The Services Union is not. Could you please explain this to me so I have a better understanding of why this is?

Could you please review my submission again now with:

a) my further clarification regarding the fact The Services Union is a Queensland branch of The Australian Services Union- I have edited the introduction to reflect this b) That you have further understanding of the importance of the ATUA is regards to Australian Trade Union history and as one of the only sources we have in regards to this. Plus you have further reviewed my refernces to newspapers.

I look forward to further feedback and hopefully the approval of this page.

(Ljbird92 (talk) 00:48, 13 November 2012 (UTC)).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/The_Services_Union

Hello,

I have made this very distinct now in my introduction for another review.

Please see my other questions in the Talk submission prior.

I look forward to you further clarifying and answering a couple of my questions regarding my referencing (and pages that have been approved-with hardly any referencing)

Ljbird92 (talk) 01:02, 13 November 2012 (UTC)).

Hi Sionk,

Thanks again for all your feedback. I have takene everything into consideration and have made major changes to my submission. Just hoping it can be looked at again soon. I have a message on my talk page too. I managed to fix up what was going on with the referencing too. I am hoping for some happy news soon.

Thanks (Ljbird92 (talk) 22:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC))

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/The_Services_Union

Artist Fionnuala Collins
Hi there SionK,

This is Ciaron Davies, the film maker. I recently wrote an article on Fionnuala Collins and it was rejected. I am a big fan of her work and really think she deserves to be credited here on wikepedia. You can find some of my fictional writing work on ciarondavieshubpages and follow links to my websites if you'd like to see some of my own work. Is there any way you can help me make this article work? I edited the text again and would apreciate any feedback. Or possibly if you were interested in redrafting it. I would love to see her article go online. Hope your having a great day!

Ciaron Davies

(Fionnuala Collins 14:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fionnualamarycollins (talk • contribs)

The Florence Art Studio
Hi SionK,

I wrote an article on The Florence Art Studio, a studio school in Florence, Italy which was rejected. It is my first wikipedia article, so maybe I just didn't know what I was doing. What exactly was wrong with it? I modeled it after a page on Charles H. Cecil Studios, which was approved, so i am confused about the rejection. What needs to be cited more clearly?

Thank you,

Kathryn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bouchaki (talk • contribs) 11:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Fionnuala Collins artist
Hi SionK

Thanks for the message

Ciaron Davies the film maker here again. Actually I am the only one using the account. However, I was wondering, how do I delete the article permanently as it is coming up in google searches.....

Thanks for your time SionK

Ciaron

(Fionnuala Collins 17:08, 15 November 2012 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fionnualamarycollins (talk • contribs)

Hi Scion, I took note of your criticism of my article for creation, then added some more citations. I was wondering if you or someone else could review it again. I would really like to get some of the articles I have been creating up, but yours was the only response I got on my articles I tried to create. I wonder if I'm doing something wrong, since I'm a newby. Laurasreagan (talk) 19:01, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Niemeyer page editing.
Hello, Thanks for the input. I just have to look for a further reference. However, one of the phrases at which you mentinoned citation was need was actualy pretty basic and widely accepted information, so I removed it. I hope that's OK. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RPFigueiredo (talk • contribs) 01:02, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Janet Devlin
Hi, I disagree with why you rejected my article on Janet Devlin. I believe that I have provided enough information on her recent events, details of her debut album campaign and her own UK and Ireland Headline Tour to prove that she is no longer just an "X Factor" contestant but an artist in her own right and so should have her own stand-alone page. Other X Factor artists who have achieved far less have their own pages (example - Daniel DeBourg) so why not Janet Devlin? Is it simply because of her recent X Factor connection? Also to state "her debut album is optimistically promised for Spring 2013" is a personal opinion, not a valid reason to reject. Saying it is optimistically promised is your view not an actual fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pingu222 (talk • contribs) 10:11, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

So even when she releases the album it isn't guaranteed that the page will be accepted for creation? If that is the case then several other former X Factor contestants should probably have their pages deleted. Thanks for the feedback regarding the sources and I will look into them and edit as appropriate. I don't believe a lot of the article post X Factor is from twitter/facebook sources but do acknowledge there are a couple that I need to look at. When would you suggest an appropriate time to re-submit this for creation? When the album is released? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pingu222 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Oscar Niemeyer editing
Thanks for the help. As a new editor I didn't know about the summaries, which I shall produce from now on. The bit you deleted wasn't written by me, but since it's relevant, I will summarise it in a next editing. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RPFigueiredo (talk • contribs) 02:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Max Florence
I do not know what else I can do. I have included a vast amount of information and I have seen hundreds of people on here with two sentences written about them. manatee55 (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

AfC/Swamp Meadow Bridge
Thanks for reviewing my proposed article now at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Swamp_Meadow_Bridge. However, I did not intend for it to be an article about the bridge itself (though I do intend to write one). My intent was to create the article "List of Rhode Island covered bridges", as similar lists exist for many other US states. In fact, I modeled it after List of Maine covered bridges and List of Vermont covered bridges. I did not know of a method to suggest a title from my sandbox. Please reevaluate it as an article suitable for this purpose. Thanks for your time! --Waz8 (talk) 03:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Oscar Smith
Oscar Smith - nicholls state and nfl football player has been denied multiple times. I found the below information regarding article acceptance on athletes. Based on what I'm reading, he should be accepted. Your feedback is welcome.

Applicable policies and guidelines All information included in Wikipedia, including articles about sports, must be verifiable. In addition, standalone articles are required to meet the General Notability Guideline. The guideline on this page provides bright-line guidance to enable editors to determine quickly if a subject is likely to meet the General Notability Guideline. Information about living persons must meet the more stringent requirements for those types of articles. It is not intended that this guideline should apply to sports clubs and teams; for these the specific notability guideline is WP:ORG. Subjects that do not meet the sport-specific criteria outlined in this guideline may still be notable if they meet the General Notability Guideline or another subject specific notability guideline. [edit]Basic criteria Main page: Wikipedia:Notability A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published[1] non-trivial[2] secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent,[3] and independent of the subject.[4] 	Trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may be used to support content in an article, but it is not sufficient to establish notability. This includes listings in database sources with low, wide-sweeping generic standards of inclusion, such as the College Football Data Warehouse. 	Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. 	Some sources must be used with particular care when establishing notability, and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Local sources must be clearly independent of the subject, and must provide a level of coverage beyond WP:ROUTINE. Listings of statistics must clearly satisfy the requirement for significant coverage. [edit]Notability guidelines on sports persons [edit]Generally acceptable standards Sports figures are presumed notable (except as noted within a specific section) if they: 1.	have participated in a major international amateur or professional competition at the highest level such as the Olympics. 2.	meet any of the qualifications in one of the sports specific sections below. Any athletic entertainment event where the results are at least partially predetermined or scripted is not covered by this page. For participants in such events (e.g. Professional wrestling), see WP:ENTERTAINER. At this time there is no consensus that Esports participants are covered by the criteria of this guideline.[5] [edit]Professional sports persons [edit]American football/Canadian football Shortcut: •	WP:NGRIDIRON

American football/Canadian football figures are presumed notable if they 1.	Have appeared in at least one regular season or post season game in any one of the following professional leagues: the Arena Football League, the Canadian Football League, theNational Football League, the third American Football League, the All-America Football Conference or the United States Football League, or any other top-level professional league. 2.	Note: Players who play in minor or semi-professional leagues (such as af2) are not presumed notable unless they meet another criterion, such as notability arising from their college football days.

MIMS Ireland
Hi I added two independent references from the Irish regulatory body mentioning that they publish their safety updates regularly in MIMS Ireland. It's number 7 and 8. Would that be enough? I hope because it's very hard to find references for this type of publication, and I can see why the Irish Medical Times and MIMS UK have none either! Also do I need to submit it again for someone to check? I can't find the link, it looks like it disappeared. I see now that it is not totally true that anybody can write an article on Wikipedia, only those who are very perseverant, committed, and have lots of time on their hands to find out how this works! ;-) Thanks Mcmousseau (talk) 15:56, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Helene Rompre
My article about Quebec writer Helene Rompre http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Helene_Rompre is being rejected even when I have included a lot of references, because it is not "relevant", yet you have an article for every Pokemon episode, character, and toy that exists.

I have seven independent references, please tell me what else i need to do to include an actual person who is having an actual influence in the world.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M cyclops (talk • contribs) 21:06, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Blue Waters Antigua
Hi Sionk,

You recently declined the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Blue_Waters_Resort_Antigua as it was felt that it read more like an advertisement.

I have since changed the article and removed all material that could be considered commercial.

I would also like to clarify that I don't work for the hotel, I visited it on holiday and after hearing about its history from the staff there thought it worthy of an article, not only due to the historical connection to Osmond Kelsick but also as it is a historical property in the Caribbean and thus is somewhat of an institution in the region.

I hope you will have the time to re-view the article and hopefully consider it worthy of inclusion.

Thanks,

--Mr.Michael.22 (talk) 15:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Predrag Boskovic
Dear SIonk,

You recently reviewed article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predrag_Bošković. Thank you for your help. Could you please let me know what I should do in order to move this article to article space.

Also, I wanted to let you know that link you are putting for RK Buducnost (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RK_Budućnost_Podgorica) is wrong because it refers to male club and Mr Boskovic is president of the women's handball club.

I am looking forward to hearing from you,

Dejan Milic — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dejanmilic (talk • contribs) 23:11, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Bratislava Jazz Days
Dear Sionk,

thanks for reviewing my article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Matissek/Bratislava_Jazz_Days

However, I'm quite unhappy about declining it 2nd time. If you look at the list of jazz festivals on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_jazz_festivals

and compare my article with most of them you will find that BJD is by far one of the best covered article. With more references than most of the festivals. I will try to find more English language references (esp. news), but understand that Czechoslovakia was a communist country and until the 1990's there was hardly any coverage at all as the communist party did not like to promote it at all.

If I don't find any articles i will just give it up.

Have a good day.

Matissek (talk) 18:35, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank You / Please revisit if you have time
Sionk, I appreciate the feedback and I have taken the information you mentioned out of the piece. If you have time, please take another look at it. I have resubmitted. Thank you for your dedication to Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Haus_Alkire — Preceding unsigned comment added by FashionInformer (talk • contribs) 21:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC) Kindly, FI — Preceding unsigned comment added by FashionInformer (talk • contribs) 21:17, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Strathmill submission.
I've added another reference for my submitted article but they all sort of say the same thing really and I know the place well enough - I can see it from my bedroom window. Trust me - it is there! :-) If that's not enough then I'll have to give up with articles because I'm just trying to reference my local knowledge. Hope that's enough anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulysses.Hood (talk • contribs) 20:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Article Rejection? Why not give some real reasons, not opinion.
Regarding Ray Butts page submission... I am very disappoint in this result of a review. First of all your comment about a "chatty manner" is simply snobby comment. My first guess is from an English major. That is an opinion, first off. Something the editor of a concise publication might say. Wikipedia is NOT that. Have you read a large percentage of this sites articles? I'm sure you would reject most of them on that basis. Some of the text was MOVED from other articles about this subject, trying to consolidate. I based the whole style of the text on similar subjects. If you want something more succinct, say it. Your comment was derogatory and unprofessional.

The whole part about it being half finished. I thought the whole point of wikipedia is to let people collaborate, the open section are just that, leaders into. I can simply remove them and resubmit on that basis, because I know that it is still enough to qualify on historic accuracy and significance. It could take me personally years to compile it all with my schedule and busyness. It took me a year for that.

I was considering donating money, but am seriously reconsidering it now. If this is what I will be supporting. I will remove the extra sections if it such a big deal. Then I will contact Wikipedia direct about your opinion on writing style. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cruzado (talk • contribs)
 * It doesn't take that much time to write a short but decent biographical article. If you browse around, you'll find plenty of them. You can contact Wikipedia, if you like, but the Foundation does not interfere with editorial matters, which is what this was. Sionk was correct in their assessment, and if you have a real interest in getting the article up and running, you'd take their advice and try to work with them, instead of making blanket accusations. Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmies (talk • contribs) 15:11, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Updated Article for Creation
Hello Sionk, I'm completely new to Wikipedia, but have tried to figure out this talk page thing. I hope I got it right! You reviewed the article I'm trying to create (link is below), and as per your suggestion, I've added references from non-related sources that vouch for the subject's (Save Elephant Foundation) notability. I don't have a link on the article page any more to re-submit the article for review. I don't know what to do now. Thank you for your help! Mindy : )

Wikipedia&.

RuralSquirrel (talk) 07:38, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

for years, and

 * I've been posting things on Wikiproject talk pages for years, hoping someone would add to various articles. To the best of my knowledge, Emilio Ambasz is the first time there was anything resembling a prompt response (or any response at all, perhaps). Thanks. GlitchCraft (talk) 13:04, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Glad to be of help! I was fascinated to find out more about Ambasz. He seems like an established and important international architect, so your contribution to the English language Wikipedia was very worthwhile in this case! Sionk (talk) 13:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Luke Webb (sculptor)
Hello, I do not understand why my proposed page has been declined. All cited references are from reputable news agencies and clearly Demonstrate that this artist is notable with the work he has completed this year. I have seen other artists with pages who have no work to mention and not referenced in the press. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skiernan1 (talk • contribs) 22:45, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Kerser Notability
You rejected this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Kerser

From one of the references: "Sydney rapper, Kerser picks up his second ARIA chart appearance with, No Rest For The Sickest. His second studio album comes just over a year on from his debut The Nubulizer (No.73 Oct. ’11). Kerser will be touring nationally in January in support of the album."

http://www.ariacharts.com.au/news/35761/chartifacts---wednesday-14th-november-2012

ARIA is Australia's national music chart. Does this not satisfy the notability criteria? 219.90.194.18 (talk) 01:05, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Falcon Group
Hello Sionk

Thanks for volunteering to take a look at this. I accept your view but I do want to make one small point of appeal: you mention that CORPDEPTH calls for mention in books and newspapers. One of my citations shows that the subject was featured in a Wall Street Journal article about new forms of financing springing up in the wake of the financial crash (see citation no.9).

^ Enrich, David; Sara Schaefer Munoz (22nd). "EU Lenders Kick Troubles Down Road". Wall Street Journal. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 21 November 2012. "It involves bundling portfolios of high-quality loans and then selling the riskiest slices of those loans—the portions that will take the earliest losses—to outside investors, according to Falcon Chairman Kamel Alzarka. The structure is intended to reduce the capital requirements associated with good loans and to avoid needing to sell bad loans at a loss."

The WSJ article was easy to miss since, as you say, most of the other citations are trade papers, but if rejection was on the grounds of overlooking the WSJ citation in error, would you reconsider now I've pointed it out?

Best J — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.200.99 (talk) 11:11, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Tim Rebowe
Hi Sionk,

I think you'll like my changes to the article on Tim Rebowe. I'm new to wikipedia and don't know how to reference inside an article. Please help me improve it, not delete it. All the information in the article was gathered from the links in the reference section. This coach is an assistant coach and was a head coach at the highest level of college football, Division I. He was also head coach at the highest level of high school football in Louisiana. I did a quick 5 minute search on people who were already on wikipedia but just assistant coaches at lower levels of college football than Rebowe(non-Divison I) and found the following: Craig Stump–Texas State, Chad Glasgow–Texas State, Don Shows–Northwestern Louisiana, Mike Nesbitt-McNeese St, Ronnie Thompson-Lamar. If they can be included then please allow Tim Rebowe to stay on wikipedia. I feel he can be considered at the pinnacle of his profession as a college coach b/c he was also a head coach. Not everyone coaches in NFL. Many well-known and very well-respected football coaches stay at the college or even high school level. As an assistant college coach, your responsibilities include helping to win games, improve offense/defense/special teams, develop players for the NFL and recruiting players to your university. The articles and references show he won games, improved defense/special teams, put many players in NFL and is a top recruiter. Lastly, this helps expand the articles of 3 college football teams in wikipedia. More information on a topic the better, as long as it can be verified, correct? I know I'm not great at writing articles in Wikipedia, but I do know what a successful well-known assistant coach looks like. Once again, please help with this article b/c Tim Rebowe has the credentials required to be in Wikipedia. THANKS, Spatms (talk) 14:30, 3 December 2012 (UTC). Spatms (talk) 23:29, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Michael_Pollack
While the sources were available the users in the previous AFD, I believe, did not examine them in the same manner. Also in the meantime I had created Notability_noticeboard and a user there said that he would recommend adding the article. Do you want me to try a DRV anyway? WhisperToMe (talk) 23:40, 6 December 2012 (UTC) to have the history of a deleted article restored behind a new, improved version of the article (called a history-only undeletion)," as two of the reasons that are "improvement-related" to have a DRV WhisperToMe (talk) 05:41, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * From the usual practice on Wikipedia I believe that if topic A is deleted in an AFD, but new sources are found or used that were not discussed or not used, then one can write a new article and it wouldn't count as G4 because the sources make it "new" and invalidate the old AFD, meaning that the nominator will have to make another AFD now accounting for the new sources. While I could make a DRV about the specific topic, it may be good to bring up this general principle in a separate discussion (maybe at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion) WhisperToMe (talk) 05:36, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I started Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion - Also there I will address the last sentence in this discussion - Also the DRV page specifically states "if significant new information has come to light since a deletion and the information in the deleted article would be useful to write a new article,
 * I started Deletion_review/Log/2012_December_9 WhisperToMe (talk) 04:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Man-Who Effect
Sionk,

Thank you for taking the time to review my article on the "Man-Who Effect". Your reason for declining this submission were because you could not find proper support for the commonality of the term "man who effect", and that most sources refer to this effect as the "confirmation bias". While might be true for the ones you have read, I believe that it misconstrues what my article was trying to present.

I am not simply attempting to rename the confirmation bias into an irrelevant name. Rather, I am trying to describe one particular phenomenon leading to erroneous judgments or decisions, which involves certain aspects of the confirmation bias. The aspect of distinction between the Man-Who Effect and the confirmation bias, is that for an individual to exhibit the Man Who Effect, they must also be incorporating aspects of other major biases and heuristics, such as the availability bias. The combinations of biases are potent and should not be overlooked, and the outcomes of these combinations are far too complicated to be simply referred to as the confirmation bias in legitimate primary literature. For example, the availability bias often contributes to the confirmation bias in hypothesis testing, because confirmatory information is more available in an individuals mind (which can be due to selective research, memory, recall, etc) as we as humans almost always give preference to information in line with our opinions/beliefs/hypotheses. Yet the the confirmation bias does not cause the availability bias (and vice versa), as they are two separate psychological phenomenon, though very difficult to distinguish where one begins and the other ends. In this way it is impossible to know exactly what combination of biases and heuristics creates the Man-Who Effect, especially as it can vary depending on the specific case at hand.

Additionally, the term "Man-Who Effect" is based off the common contemporary statement "I know a man who...", which then leads to the error via the reasons above and many more.

I'm sure there are other problems with my article that need addressing, but if I were to the above statements clear in my submission, would that sate your issue? Again, I appreciate the feedback, and any more feedback you or others have. I by no means consider my knowledge of this field of psychology succinct enough to be taken for certain.

Best,

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hortw (talk • contribs) 01:52, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Regarding your suggestion to simply add BiMBA to Peking /University
First I would like to thank you for reviewing my article, however I cannot accept your suggest to simply add BiMBA to Peking University. Like I've explained to the reviewer before you, and the one before him, BiMBA is not a part of Peking University, and BiMBA is not under the direct control of Peking University. Thus, it would make no sense for it to be simply a paragraph inside Peking University. If only there were a special note section for the reviewers to read, I would not have to reexplain the situation every time it gets rejected because the reviewer saw it better fit to be inside Peking University. Nevertheless, I am willing to work with you to get this article up to your standards for approval. I see that citation is an issue for you, however I have included several references to outside independent sources, how many sources do you need exactly? I have seen many similar articles with much less references, yet they were approved. What exactly is the standard for approval? Any insight to your standards would help me better adjust the article to your liking. Thank you. Tyawang (talk) 04:11, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello, I'm not sure whether or not you've seen my reply to you on my talk page, but after I've written you a reply, I thought to myself how can I better explain the relationship between Peking University and BiMBA, and I think essentially the relationship is similar to the relationship between Harvard University and Harvard Business School. Although they are in some ways related, they are essentially completely independent entities, with different boards and admissions and so on. You would not request for HBS to be included as a stub to Harvard University right? I guess this is the best way to explain the reason behind wanting to establish a separate article for BiMBA. Further, the relationship is even more complicated for BiMBA and PKU because, PKU already has a school of management, that is directly owned by PKU, and receive their MBA degree from PKU, and is under control of ministry of education. However, BiMBA is sort of a joint-educational venture between NSD and its global partners, so the graduates of receive their MBAs from Vlerick, hence the i in BiMBA. I hope I am not complicating things too much for you, I know the relationship is complicated, which is why I didn't want to include it as a paragraph in the BiMBA. Perhaps I will add the relationship later, but for now, the most important thing is to actually create an article on BiMBA before expanding it further so it will eventually be the size of say HBS or other business schools. Thank you for your time, I hope you will work with me to publish this article.


 * p.s. I have reworded the intro so perhaps it will be a bit easier to tell the relationship. The way it's worded is similar to the way Harvard Business School is worded, so I think it should be up to the standards. If you would like to see another similar article that I am basing my article content standards on, please refer to CEIBS. Thank you Tyawang (talk) 03:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Rejection of Sir William Hawkslow Middlemore article.
Hello Sionk, I just wanted to add a response to this. While some of what you said maybe valid concerning his birth and death dates, I find what you said " William seems to be known only for collecting speeding tickets and marrying a typist." to be unfair - he was known for motoring offences including a fine and a crash which was reported in countries around the world, and was known for marrying Violet Constance Kennagh, who happened to be a typist, which was reported as far away as Australia. So in a neutral perspective he was notable for at least two aspects of his life. If someone was writing a study on motoring offences or notable weddings they may appreciate these facts that might not appeal to millions of others but are still things that happened, notable wordwide. Middle More (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Rejection of article about singer Junaid Khan
First of all thank you for your time considering my article for sumbission. I still have a question though. This is my second time trying to submit the article. The reason for denial is once again not enough proof of notability of a person I'm writing about. I read carefully all the instructions. I added about 10 references.Can you please be a little bit more specific? What do I need to add or change? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Junaid_Khan(Call_Band) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katya bost23 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Somebody has recently created the article in Wikipdia's main space. I can see now he meets the basic notability requirements. You can add to the new article (though make sure you provide reliable sources for any new information). Sionk (talk) 12:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Need to clarification on the rejection of the FEAPO article
Hi,

I need to get some clarification on the rejection of the FEAPO article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wlammert/Federation_of_Enterprise_Architecture_Professional_Organizations This is a new professional organization so there isn't a lot of published material. Many of our member organizations have FEAPO articles so I wonder why they are allowed and we are not.

Please help me understand. Wlammert (talk) 22:58, 9 December 2012 (UTC) Walt Lammert
 * Hi Walt, you said yourself, "This is a new professional organization so there isn't a lot of published material." That's reason enough. Wikipedia has a notability requirement that there be significant coverage in secondary sources. Without that, there can be no article. Lady  of  Shalott  23:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sarah-Jayne Gratton article

 * How tedious Sionk... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opn800 (talk • contribs) 13:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Elitism within the Wikipedia community does exist: "Trusted Wikipedia editors allegedly involved in favoritism scandal" [1] ^ http://www.techspot.com/news/50226-trusted-wikipedia-editors-allegedly-involved-in-favoritism-scandal.html

An Barnstar for You!

 * Thanks! And I'm sure I've reviewed twice as many since the drive finished. It's endless!! Sionk (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Bloggermaster1/ Proposed deletion
Hello, Sionk, I Really want to thank you for your review on varpal, i was trying to link related articles as you request that varpal is an orphan, i was Not trying to Spam any content,,i added varpal on a social networking, that was the reason why Andy tag the article as spamming,,

Thanks Hope to hear from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bloggermaster1 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah yes, it it a double-edged sword, you add links to your article (which is a good thing) and it integrates it into Wikipedia, but at the same time more people found out about it and they are not always so favourable. In situations like this it's always best to discuss these things politely and constructively, hopefully leading to agreement. Best of luck! Sionk (talk) 16:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you once again for your wonderful and polite attitude.i just learnt a cool lesson from you.i will now be mindful how i link articles. Best of luck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bloggermaster1 (talk • contribs) 07:47, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Rejection of article VITESS because of references
Dear Sionk,

thank you for taking the time to review articles! I've got a question concerning the rejection of the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KashmirVanBlum/VITESS about the software package VITESS because "This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability": could you please specify which condition for notability is not fulfilled? In my opinion, significant coverage is given since a description of the software package as well as its performance compared to other software as well as real experiments are covered. The sources include articles in scientific journals (having passed a review process) as well as a talk at an international conference, which to me seems as reliable as it gets, and are independent per se in case of the journals and indepent in case of the talk because the speaker has nothing to do with the software package development (which by the way is also true for the authors of one cited article). Please indicate which aspect of notability these references are lacking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KashmirVanBlum (talk • contribs) 15:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Dear Sionk,

thank you for the clarification! Showing that this software is used by many different people for different studies can't be shown with one citation, so I added several more references now, including quite new ones. (You can also get an impression on its relevance by searching for articles having VITESS as keyword, e.g. on sciencedirect.com.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by KashmirVanBlum (talk • contribs) 16:57, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Robert Gibbons (Poet)
Hi Sionk,

On December 5 you declined the submission of Robert Gibbons' page to Wikipedia.

As his current publisher, I created & submitted the page.

Reason given for rejection was that he, or his work of 40 years were not deemed notable.

We do hope that you thoroughly examined each entry, realizing that his books have been consistently reviewed by one on the most important, long-standing journals in America, Evergreen Review, founded & edited by Robert's late friend & mentor, Barney Rosset.

That two of the most important critics in the country, Marjorie Perloff, & the late Guy Davenport, both compared his work favorably to Rimbaud's.

That William Heyen has referred to him, after reading the book This Time, as "one of the great writers of our time."

That Ben Bollig of Oxford University posted: "...he is the most passionate advocate of poetry I have met."

That the current Archivist of the United States, & former Director of the New York Public Library, David Ferriero, wrote of This Time, "This is a book to be read slowly, carefully. A journey, creating for the reader a sense of Timelessness - permission to undertake personal exploration and reflection. One completes that journey a better observer and with a deeper appreciation of the world with Gibbons as the guide."

Sam Hamill of Copper Canyon Press compared his work in the book Of DC, (cover personally designed by Robert Rauschenberg), to the music of Thelonius Monk.

Richard Hoffman, Chairperson of PEN New England, "To read Gibbons' body of work from its beginnings to the present is to watch him make himself into a poet the way Coltrane or Mingus made themselves into musicians."

That as former Poetry & Fiction Editor of Janus Head, he solicited & published work by Robert Bly, Fanny Howe, Pattiann Rogers, Jerome Rothenberg, etc., + translations of Paul Celan & Pablo Neruda by John Felstiner, etc.

& so on.

I am in the process of publishing Gibbons' book on Charles Olson & Clyfford Still, dedicated to his friend & former colleague at the National Gallery of Art, David Anfam, now Commissioning Editor at Phaidon in London, who wrote the Catalogue Raisonné of Mark Rothko.

David unrolled the long-hidden Still paintings archived in a Maryland warehouse prior to construction of the Clyfford Still Museum in Denver, where he then curated the inaugural exhibit.

I do not have time to hash things out in order to convince anyone of the notability of Gibbons' work.

Please reconsider the status of this submission.

Thank you.

Geoff Gronlund

Nine Point Publishing

http://www.ninepointpublishing.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ggloyd621 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately if you are unable or unwilling to improve the article there's no great reason for me to continue the conversation. In the meantime you may want to look at Wikipedia's guidance on conflict of interest. Thankyou. Sionk (talk) 20:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Directions on Microsoft article
Hello Scionk, this article was rejected due to notability. I have resubmitted this article several times, each time adding more sources. Do you view the last sources I proposed as too few or not reliable? Please let me know so I can understand what is required.

Thank you

Robsanf (talk) 18:54, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Your review of my George Smith submission
Thanks for your very helpful and constructive comments. I am new at this and they are appreciated.

Smittie is a legend in the midwest and I believe worthy of an entry. I will have another go at editing to meet the criteria.

Thanks again. Tigertwice (talk) 21:28, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

I have now edited and re-submitted but can't find it. Is it there?

ThanksTigertwice (talk) 23:11, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


 * It is here Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George G. "Smittie" Smith, but seems to be partly missing! Sionk (talk) 00:06, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Mike Nesbitt
If you have a moment, please take another look at Articles for deletion/Mike Nesbitt (American football). Numerous sources have been added to the article since you nominate the article for deletion. These additional sources may or may not lead you to change your mind, but you should be aware the article has changed significantly since you made the nomination. Cbl62 (talk) 01:16, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Articles for creation/Charbroiler - comments regarding rejection
Sionk, My request for submission of a new article was rejected yesterday and I wanted to address the concerns you and the other reviewers put forth. I also request that you reconsider rejection of this article for the reasons I outline below: 1)	I have added a host of new reference and a list of sources absent from my first submission – please refer to the updated posting as of 1:30pm 12/12/12. 2)	The Cooking Equipment industry, of which I and my employer are part, is not one with extensive (or ANY) technical literature publications that can be used for primary reference per se. This entry is intended to serve as a resource for exactly that point, thus the more detailed aspect. Some aspects of the posting are based on common construction and operation techniques that may be inferred from the new reference documents. 3)	I am a professional engineer in this field and industry - verifiable via the following links, to the extent that these qualify as acceptable sources: a)	PROFESSIONAL PROFILE: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-yungbluth-p-e/40/869/b4b b)	INDUSTRY PATENT: http://www.acuteip.com/patents/case/12409246 c)	COMPANY VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wVDW-QDdWg 4)	Literature regarding maintenance, operation and function are specific to the manufacturers and don’t typically have web links on the company web pages (mine included), but through other outlets more common to the industry. This literature is updated and changed with product modifications and discontinuations, and so may not be linked only a short time later. I’ve included references to this effect as they are currently available.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Charbroiler

Rejection Statement: Other editors have struggled to put their finger on what is wrong with this article. I would suggest large parts fall into Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia isn't an instruction manual. It's okay to decribe what a Charbroiler is, what it does and how it is used, but detailed (largely unsourced) maintainance instructions seem unnecessary. I would suggest the article is kept succinct, to avoid the implication that this is largely original research. Large parts are currently unsourced, which needs to be corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyungbluth (talk • contribs) 18:35, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

rejected article improved - can you check it out
Hey

You rejected the Plague Inc. wiki page a few months back due to a lack of notability

I have just updated it to clarify why it is notable with links from wired.com and IGN's GotY 2012 pages.

Can you please check it out and see if it passes inspection now ;) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Plague_Inc.

Regards

James

Jamiejme (talk) 12:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

rejected article improved
Hi Sionk,

Yo have recently rejected my Applescal article due to it not being notable in your eyes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Applescal

I have compared it to the artist article page of Max Cooper electronica musician and i came to the conclusion that this artist seems to be less notable than Applescal. Max Cooper has not made a single artist album. Whilst Applescal has made 3 of them being reviewed by the biggest music blogs out there like Pitchfork Media.

I have added a link to an album review on Pitchfork, a reference to Max Cooper and several notable external links to articles on the greater music blogs this world has to offer.

Cheers Troy

Troyepiqurus (talk) 11:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Thankyou for pointing this out. I've nominated the Max Cooper (electronica musician) article for deletion.
 * As for your article, I agree, the Pitchfork and the Residential Advisor articles are useful sources, but we'd need to see evidence at least one of Applescal's works has received multiple reviews. See WP:NMUSIC. Sionk (talk) 13:25, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Rejected my article
Hi Sionk,

I just saw that you have reject my Gloomshade article due to reference. I have inserted new reference and hope you will accept. Please let me know if anything is still going wrong on my Gloomshade article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Gloomshade-_A_Digital_Media_Network

I look forward to your response, Sana — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olegoethe (talk • contribs) 16:58, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Re Submission on entry for Catherine Hunter
Hi Sionk

Thank you for taking the time to review my submission for an article on Catherine Hunter. I accept all your points about the style and content of the piece, which I have now substantially revised as suggested. I also accept that as submitted, I didn’t make the case for Hunter’s notability. I omitted a number of references to her work simply because they were in praise of it and I didn’t want it to read like a hagiography. These include independent, verifiable secondary sources, among them Australia’s leading newspapers and broadcaster. I’m still unclear how (or whether) to incorporate them, but I include some references below for your background. Hunter’s role is also highlighted in several books by and about Australian artists, but these aren’t on line. For example, she is described in Australian actor Max Cullen’s memoirs thus: “Catherine’s art stories had helped make Sunday the most sophisticated current affairs programme on TV” (Tell ‘Em Nothing, Take ‘Em Nowhere, Pan Macmillan, 2010 p.221).

Some other references

The Age newspaper:

“When it came to cultural matters the Packer flagship looked like a million dollars. When Sunday arts producer Catherine Hunter, who resigned recently, did a story about Kate Grenville's The Secret River, she took a superb crew down the Hunter River and had Jack Thompson reading Grenville's saga of settlers and Aborigines. Just the other week I saw a very fine story she did about Bronwyn Oliver, the sculptor who died recently by her own hand. It was superbly composed, utterly plain and utterly compelling. For a moment I thought I was watching ABC arts, but then I realised I couldn't be. No, this was television journalism at the highest level. It had to be Sunday.” (Peter Craven, former editor of the Quarterly Essay) http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2006/08/30/1156816965284.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1

The Australian newspaper:

“Sunday's arts coverage outshone that of the ABC, a remarkable feat given the disparity of resources and a testament to the skills of now departed arts producer Catherine Hunter…” http://www.theaustralian.com.au/media/trailblazer-dying-of-neglect/story-e6frg996-1111112453385

From reviews of films etc:

ABC Radio “brilliant filmmaker Catherine Hunter” http://blogs.abc.net.au/sa/2012/11/master-of-stillness-catherine-hunter-on-jeffrey-smart-.html?site=riverland&program=adelaide_mornings

The Australian newspaper:

“A gorgeously elegiac film about the nature of art.” http://www.theaustralian.com.au/arts/television/tracing-artistic-steps-in-smarts-country/story-fncnqfdm-1226524690344

Tim Olsen Gallery “This wonderful documentary produced by Catherine Hunter” http://www.timolsengallery.com/pages/podcasts_details_lrg.php?podcast_id=6

Art Gallery of NSW “A wonderful documentary by filmmaker Catherine Hunter…” http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au/prizes/archibald/2012/29243/

01 Editions “…renowned film maker Catherine Hunter…” http://www.01editions.com.au/news.html

Grubstreet “Catherine Hunter is widely acknowledged as the foremost producer/director of arts programming on Australian television.” www.grubstreet.com.au/GrubSite_026.swf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anselm57 (talk • contribs) 22:47, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Submission for Ingrid Gerdes
Thanks for your suggestion for my wiki article on Ingrid Gerdes. I have gone though and fixed my references as well as tried to prove that the subject is notable enough to have an article on the site. Particularly to #10 and #12 of Notability. Perhaps you might be able to take another look and let me know if this is sufficient enough for acceptance. I appreciate your help! Best, ClassicalTone (talk) 22:41, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Chris P. James submission
Hello,

I have submitted the article for Chris P. James twice now and it has been rejected twice on the basis of unverifiable references. All the references, which were updated and added to, are indeed verifiable, causing me to wonder if you actually took the time to check any of them. Wikipedia, which at one time was a great place to share information on people, places, events and things, has apparently become controlled by gatekeepers. Although I'm not at all sure what gives you the authority to reject a submission, since you are not a musician and apparently have no knowledge of musicians, I would like to encourage you to actually take a moment to check the sources I provided for the article before you reject it. You obviously did not do that. Thank you. 68.53.124.43 (talk) 23:08, 17 December 2012 (UTC) Warren Ells


 * Album liner notes, Myspace, Facebook and blogs are not reliable sources and do not prove he is widely known. I suggest you read the advice I left for you. Sionk (talk) 23:56, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter
Delivered 01:14, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Jack Henderson
Hey

I added lots more references for you. Please let me know if this is OK or if you require more.

E. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TommyTipper (talk • contribs) 06:00, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with the Jack stuff
Thanks. I look forward to improving it over the next few weeks. I have further references and will add them and trim down what we have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TommyTipper (talk • contribs) 17:57, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Not understanding lack of notability and need for more/better references
Sionk, Not sure why this has been tagged as lacking notability: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Asterisk_Financial_Inc.

Asterisk is notable for being the creator of - and only provider of - personal guarantee insurance, for which they have a U.S. Patent on the underwriting process: http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/patog/week02/OG/html/1374-2/US08095396-20120110.html

Citations are from third-party sources, not from Asterisk itself.

Please elaborate if you can on the specifics of the rejection and why/how it doesn't meet the notability threshold. Thanks.

Michael O&#39;Brien (talk) 14:32, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Michael O&#39;Brien (talk) 14:38, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

cont. BiMBA talk
Dear Sionk,

I've left you messages both on my own talk page as well as replied to you on your own talk page, but i haven't heard back from you.

I have reworded the intro so perhaps it will be a bit easier to tell the relationship. The way it's worded is similar to the way Harvard Business School is worded, so I think it should be up to the standards. If you would like to see another similar article that I am basing my article content standards on, please refer to CEIBS. Thank you

When you have the chance, please visit the BiMBA page and see if everything you need to approve it is accounted for, and if you still need me to input something else, please tell me. Thank you. Tyawang (talk) 07:08, 20 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I'd prefer to leave it for another editor to give a second opinion. The article still quite clearly states it is part of Peking University. The Harvard Business School article is quite poor at the moment, not a great exemplar. Sionk (talk) 11:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

NSONG
I have created another version at NSONG. Please review and leave me any suggestions or comments at the latest version. Many thanks, Mkdw talk 09:13, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

seven examples of reviews
Sionk,

With regards to coverage in newspapers, magazines and other media as well, below are seven examples of reviews. They are listed as they appear numerically in the reference list of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A House, A Home (film). I have included a brief description of the publishers because from your message I gather that is the context you want to see.


 * reference 2: Dave Cusick, OPB Music: OPB was founded in 1923 and is the primary public broadcasting network for most of Oregon as well as southern Washington. OPB Music currently has a U.S. Alexa traffic rank of 457,737.


 * reference 9: Jeremy Petersen, NPR: In the United States NPR is the cornerstone of the public broadcasting system. NPR was founded in 1971 and according to NPR they have a weekly audience of 27 million people. NPR Music launched in November 2007 to present public radio music programming and original editorial content for music discovery. NPR has an Alexa global traffic rating of 957. It's U.S. rating is 276. There are 121,447 sites that link to NPR.


 * reference 11: Current: Current is a progressive media company led by former US Vice President and Nobel Prize winner Al Gore. Current has a global traffic rating of 9,041 and 29,689 sites link to Current.


 * reference 13: Oliver Lyttelton, Indie Wire: Indiewire.com was founded in 1998. It is a site dedicated to Independent filmmaking and has a U.S. Alexa rating of 3,542. 12,452 sites link to Indie Wire.


 * reference 14: Laurel Brauns 1859 Oregon Magazine, 1859 is a magazine founded in 2007. It is published bi-monthly and is owned by Deschutes Media.


 * reference 18: Mathew Singer, Willamette Week: Willamette Week is a Pulitzer Prize winning weekly newspaper that was founded in 1974.
 * reference 19: Ryan White,The Oregonian: The Oregonian …was founded in 1850, it is the oldest continuously published newspaper on the U.S. west coast, it is the largest newspaper in the Pacific Northwest by circulation. The Oregonian is the 19th largest daily newspaper in the United States of America and in 2001 it won a Pulitzer Prize for Public Service.

Have a good weekend and holiday season, Cameraf72 (talk) 16:20, 21 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Best wishes to you too. Unfortunately we're looking for significant coverage about "A House, A Home". Apart from source 2, the coverage seems to be about the choir and/or the music. I'd be surprised if a (very short) award-winning film hadn't attracted wider notice. But I can't see much to convince me at the moment, sorry. Sionk (talk) 20:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply. I will work at sourcing additional editorial reviews that are specific to the film. I understand, the central theme of the reviews needs to be "about" the film rather than the band or song that influenced the creation of the film. Thanks again for getting back to me. Cameraf72 (talk) 20:31, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Tom Tattoo
I see that you looked into the copyvio concerns associated with Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tom Tattoo. My guess is that the bot picked up on a list if the fathers of tattoo art: dennis cockell horiyoshi iii don ed hardy leo zulueta bill salmon petelo suluape gippi rondinella. While it could probably be handled better, I decided it was OK, although I suppose one could argue the list is creative. It was referenced. I originally thought it was fine, I'm now having second thoughts, although it isn't clear the article will survive for other reasons.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  22:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what you mean. I declined the article because it was inadequately sourced. Sionk (talk) 23:53, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm referring to your edit summary here where you said "(Can't see any evidence of WP:COPYVIO)"-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  02:18, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Henry Neville Southern
I've reverted you at Henry Neville Southern. The references are obituaries named for the subject, not by him. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:26, 28 December 2012 (UTC)