User talk:SirDukeOfAwe

January 2024
Hello, I'm Patient Zero. An edit you recently made to Domestic short-haired cat seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Patient Zerotalk 03:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * I am so sorry about that! I thought that I had changed it back. Is it okay if I changed the photo of the cat on there? SirDukeOfAwe (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If possible, could you please change the name of the file to something more accurate and descriptive? You can do so by following the guidelines here. Thanks, -- LemonSlushie 🍋 (talk) (edits) 05:29, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I changed it to “a common Domestic Short Hair Cat”. Is that okay? SirDukeOfAwe (talk) 05:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Domestic short-haired cat. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Domestic short-haired cat was changed by SirDukeOfAwe (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926101 on 2024-01-12T05:25:58+00:00


 * While we're at it, comments like this are considered disruptive . Article talk pages are for discussing encyclopedic content. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

SirDukeOfAwe (talk) 06:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry, his name is KitKatFat. My apologies. SirDukeOfAwe (talk) 06:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Also, please read WP:LITTLEBROTHER. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:19, 13 January 2024 (UTC)