User talk:SirDukerton/Vontae Diggs

what does the article do well? A lot because it short write up or less your not done. Is there anything from your review that impressed you? No because SirDukerton is not done. Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? It is about Vontae Diggs. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? nothing Why would those changes be an improvement? Write more What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? explain more Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?Let them know! Add more in all paragraph. A lead section that is easy to understand yes ,but maybe small A clear structure yes Balanced coverage yes, could be longer Neutral content Don't see. Reliable sources Don't see. Looking at the lead by itself, do I feel satisfied that I know the importance of the topic? No explain more. Looking at the lead again after reading the rest of the article, does the lead reflect the most important information? add Write more Does the lead give more weight to certain parts of the article over others? Is anything missing? Is anything redundant? No Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? I don't know because no years. Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? No Does the article reflect all the perspectives represented in the published literature? Yes Are any significant viewpoints left out or missing? Yes Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? Yes Do you think you could guess the perspective of the author by reading the article? No Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y." X Does the article make claims on behalf of unnamed groups or people? For example, "some people say..." no Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? Remember, neutral doesn't mean "the best positive light" or "the worst, most critical light." It means a clear reflection of various aspects of a topic. Negative Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? No Sources Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view. no Sources Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately! I don't know because no sources