User talk:Sir Cumference

Welcome!
Really.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.69.173.159 (talk) 01:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Botana Curus illustration.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Botana Curus illustration.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Hypothesis of everything listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hypothesis of everything. Since you had some involvement with the Hypothesis of everything redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Trovatore (talk) 21:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Circumstellar disk a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Circumstellar disc. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Gap9551 (talk) 22:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Circumstellar disc
Hi, if you change the spelling of a work in an article, such as with this edit, make sure not to change the spelling within references (e.g. article titles). Thanks, Gap9551 (talk) 23:36, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Your requests at WP:RMTR
Hello User:Are you freaking kidding me. The capitalization of 'universe' has been extensively discussed. If you want to reopen that question, you may consider posting at WT:MOSCAPS. A specific discussion was held last April at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters/Archive 18. For now, I am declining these as technical moves, since they are obviously controversial. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Here's a link to corresponding discussion at MOS: . Isambard Kingdom (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello User:Are you freaking kidding me. Administrator EdJohnston suggested you could take this to WT:MOSCAPS. You didn't. Instead you have been changing "universe" to "Universe" in many articles, for example in Astrophysics, Astronomy, Science, Cosmological principle. Could you please heed Isambard Kingdom's warning that "there is plenty of emotion about this issue", stop, and agree that your edits are unsustainable? Peter Gulutzan (talk) 16:39, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Since you did not reply, I felt it was best (before too many intervening edits occur) to revert some of the changes. This does not mean that I know better, and I added to each edit summary "... ask on WT:MOSCAPS if you disagree". Peter Gulutzan (talk) 23:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)


 * EdJohnston, they're still at it. Drmies (talk) 22:19, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

"concepts"
I've started this discussion of one of your edits. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

You have created an isolated exception to this pattern. In many of these cases it would be silly to say that all of the _things_ are _concepts_, and it is at best questionable in the case of Euler. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Your campaign of mass changes to the capitalization of 'universe'
Hello User:Are you freaking kidding me. Beginning with this edit you've started a new campaign of capitalizing 'universe' across multiple articles. Another one was here at Cosmography. You need to stop this and wait for consensus. If you don't do so I am planning to block your account. The problem was drawn to your attention earlier on this page in User talk:Are you freaking kidding me. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:36, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * , see here. Drmies (talk) 04:44, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Are you kidding me? I was reverting your changes. I thought we weren't changing the capitalization until a consensus reached. It was upper case originally, you kept changing it (without any reason besides "sorry, no"), so I reverted it. Don't pin the blame on me, instead give a logical reason as to why you changed it. --Are you freaking kidding me (talk) 04:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * As for, please check the history of the article before taking action. As you can see, the article clearly used an uppercase "Universe" before User:Drmies's edits. Almost hypocritically, he changes the case, with literally no reason besides "lower case", and complains when I attempt to revert it. I assumed you didn't want anyone changing the capitalization until a consensus was reached. If I was wrong, I apologize, I reverted his edits with your warning in mind. --Are you freaking kidding me (talk) 05:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Noted, but what about Cosmography? With this edit you changed a long-standing lower case spelling 'universe' to upper case. EdJohnston (talk) 05:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm sorry about that. I haven't touched it since you warned me today; instead, I asked about it here. --Are you freaking kidding me (talk) 05:31, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Discussion about renaming lists to include known
Hi, in case you have not noticed, a discussion about whether to reverse your moves, and to remove "known" from the list of known ... articles is taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. You may wish to talk about it there. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:59, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Googology
See Talk:Large numbers and Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 5. Feel free to invite anyone who can provide evidence that the term is used. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:57, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Please include an edit summary on all edits
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. There are a lot of rules and they're not all in one place, unfortunately, so the learning curve is more like a staircase of deep steps. One of them is Help:Edit summary. A user who does not use the edit summary can be seen as either careless, or trying to hide their edits, or both. To avoid accidentally leaving edit summaries blank, you can select "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" on the Editing tab of your user preferences. Edit summary legend might help, too. Thanks, and happy editing. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 15:27, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

This, this, and this, made yesterday and today, to Laniakea Supercluster are exactly what I'm talking about. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 05:42, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Must I provide an edit summary for very small changes like those? That'd be obnoxiously time-consuming, since I was mass-editing a bunch of articles. When I actually add content, I usually provide edit summaries. AYFKM (talk) 12:42, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, you should provide an edit summary even for very small, and in this case very controversial, changes like those, because it's more time-consuming for all page watchers to see what you've done. That's why it's called Always provide an edit summary; please read it, and don't try to hide your edits.  ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  14:38, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Tom is right.Isambard Kingdom (talk) 14:44, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Damn
CALM DOWN I got it ! Thanx for the link to the discussion. Mlpearc ( open channel ) 21:36, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Greetings
Hey, good luck on getting into college and theoretical astrophysics. Don't let wikipedia waste all your time; be strategic. Drop me an email if you'd like to discuss. Dicklyon (talk) 04:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oort cloud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

there is no question mark at the end of your username
Hello,

I just thought I might mention, there is no question mark at the end of your username. 6cb49af5c4 (talk) 21:36, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Sir, I salute you for your name-change choice, most commendable. 6cb49af5c4 (talk) 22:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mpemba effect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freeze. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Principle of detailed balance has been accepted
 Principle of detailed balance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Principle_of_detailed_balance help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 04:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proof by minimal counterexample (September 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StartOkayStop was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Proof by minimal counterexample and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Proof_by_minimal_counterexample Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StartOkayStop&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Proof_by_minimal_counterexample reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

StartOkayStop (talk) 05:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Proof by minimal counterexample
Hello, Sir Cumference. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Proof by minimal counterexample, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Proof by minimal counterexample


Hello, Sir Cumference. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Proof by minimal counterexample".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)