User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington/Archive/Archive03

Attention!- If you wish to leave me new messages, please visit User talk:Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington

Feel free to leave a message for me on this page; I shall endeavour to respond to everything I get on the sender's talk page, so please sign using ~.

May the Force be with you.
Dear ,
 * Thanks for voting on my RFA! I appreciate your faith in me, and was overwhelmed by the positive response to my RFA; for it shows that at least I'm doing something right. :) I've started working to improve myself already, and I hope that next time, things run better, and maybe, just maybe, one day we can bask on the shores of Admintopia together. Thanks and cheers, _-M   o   P-_

Thanks
I plan to expand the article a bit over the weekend. &mdash; Ravikiran 13:21, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: You're message
I removed content that I submitted that was up for deletion. You were going to delete it anyway, I just beat you to the punch. Please refrain from sending me anymore messages.

darjeeling
Hi! Could you please have a quick look of Darjeeling? Please give your suggestions in the article's talk page. This is for an internal review before moving to peer review. Thanks. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:17, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Ahmedabad
Hi. I think Ahmedabad is nearly ready for PR and FA. Can you take a quick look at the article and give me suggestions as to what is still needed? - Aksi_great (talk) 10:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Indian Copyright Act
I'm a litte busy with map making right now. Here's another site with the copyrights: http://www.indialawinfo.com/bareacts/cpr.html. Could you do the needful? Thanks and regards, =Nichalp   «Talk»=  06:19, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your congrats &mdash; hope I live up to everyone's expectations and your support. Saravask 07:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

I cleaned up an Indian article
I just cleaned up an India-related article, but I'm not quite sure I got everything right, could you go over my edit? I had to second-guess a lot of stuff, as well as remove things I didn't think belonged there. - O bli (Talk) ? 13:46, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Review
I would prefer that you have it peer reviewed. I prefer to add my comments there. This is not my area of expertese so I'll only list a few comments here:
 * 1) Table should be narrowed
 * 2) ... Religious Freedom Act...1998 should be unwikified
 * 3) History the Act --> History
 * 4) Headings should be made more terse
 * 5) 4.1 heading unnecessary
 * 6) This is an American-themed articles, so the spellings should reflect AE
 * 7) Organisation needs to be expanded.

Will review in depth once put on PR. =Nichalp  «Talk»=  15:19, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Khalistan move.
Hi,

I'll reply on the Khalistan talk page. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 17:15, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Divisive
I'm not sure what is meant by that. I can delete the boxes if you so wish. Regards, =Nichalp   «Talk»=  12:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Deleted! =Nichalp   «Talk»=  16:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Your Userboxes
Hi,

I know my opinion wasn't asked, but still after seeing your querry on Nichalp's page, I felt like replying. I feel that the only userbox someone will oppose is the "This user should not be trusted" one. I don't know about User varied sex, but its no longer present so no issue (unless it was deleted because its offensive. Even I have a lot of userboxes and am a great fan of them. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 12:22, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Khalistan
I will do that after reading the discussion very carefully. BTW, how are you - we have not chatted for long. (Nothing related to wikipedia - I also did not reply to your e-mails, but you did a right thing, I feel so.) Please remain in touch. --Bhadani 14:30, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for voting in my RfA!
Thanks for the vote in my RfA! I appreciate the comment. The RfA didn't get consensus, but I'm glad I accepted the nomination. - Amgine 16:07, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Reminder...
When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use &#123;&#123;subst:test&#125;&#125; instead of &#123;{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.

Also, I noticed in your message (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:128.91.107.45&oldid=48605823) that you said, please do vandalise the pages. I hope you don't want that! :P Just kidding. — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 03:03, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Khalistan
Hello, how are you? To-day no one came to my talk page, and I was really feeling lonely. My comments about your message: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Khalistan&diff=52679792&oldid=52676020 --Bhadani 16:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, no sorry-business. All the best for exams! may God bless you! After your exams are over, we shall again chat via gmail. --Bhadani 17:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * All the best from me too! --Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  )  17:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Anmol.2k4 and IP address.
Hi,

If you take a look at User_talk:Sukh, you'll see that is his IP address. Thanks. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 17:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Hi Anirudh,

Thank you for strongly supporting my RFA! Even though it did not succeed I want to heartily thank you for your faith in me & my abilities. If it weren't for you guys I probably would have never been confident enough to consider myself for the position. I will look to keep your confidence in me intact for a long time to come.

Cheers

Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  )  00:50, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome
This is supposed to be printed on a user's talk page ;-) Cheers! PS your "Leave me a message | " link is broken. Regards, =Nichalp   «Talk»=  14:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Whoops! ;) -- Andy123  (talk)  14:48, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Community Justice Newsletter
 Community Justice Newsletter

superthanks


Hi Anirudhpajji - I'm very sorry to have disappointed your expectation in me, but it had become impossible for me to compromise my principles. I don't covet adminship at all, so it wasn't a difficult decision - I simply cannot accept misrepresentation and nonsense. However, I cannot tell you how greatly joyous I feel at the enthusiastic, wonderful support you expressed for me. I don't know how hard it will be to understand that your supports means extremely a lot to me. I thank you from my heart, and please let me know if I can ever be assistance or help in anything. Rama&#39;s Arrow 21:09, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi to you too
Yes. Yesterday was a bad day. An admin just blocked me when I posted a warning on his page for making a personal attack on Samir. Then the whole thing started. Gurubrahma and Sundar had to intervene. But later that admin apologised to me, so I have decided to leave the issue behind. What about you? Why not very active these days? Exams? - Aksi_great (talk) 16:31, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * BTW. Nice change in your signature. - Aksi_great (talk) 16:31, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah like the new sig too. BTW All the best for your exams. When are they finishing? --Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  )  16:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * All the best to you. Hope you do great. - Aksi_great (talk) 16:51, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for spotting it. Was half asleep when I archived my page :) --Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  )  16:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * (P.S do you want to mee on google chat. My id is srikeit at gmail dot com. )

Sukh's RFA - Thanks!
Thank you for your vote on my RfA. Unfortunately there was no consensus reached at 43 support, 18 oppose and 8 neutral. I've just found out that there is a feature in "my preferences" that forces me to use edit summaries. I've now got it enabled :) Thanks again. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 15:46, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof 1.2 Now Available
 After a lenghty, but much-needed Wikibreak, I'm happy to announce that version 1.2 of VandalProof is now available for download! Beyond fixing some of the most obnoxious bugs, like the persistent crash on start-up that many have experienced, version 1.2 also offers a wide variety of new features, including a stub-sorter, a global user whitelist and blacklist, navigational controls, and greater customization. You can find a full list of the new features here. While I believe this release to be a significant improvement over the last, it's nonetheless nowhere near the end of the line for VandalProof. Thanks to Rob Church, I now have an account on test.wikipedia.org with SysOp rights and have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my simple history merge tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your suggestions for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing! --AmiDaniel (talk) 02:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank-you
I'm glad you liked the song. Here's one more verse:


 * {| style="background-color: #e7efef; border: solid 1px darkcyan;"


 * [[Image:LyttonMajorGeneralMop2.gif|130px]]
 * style="background-color: #e0e0f0; padding: 1em; border: solid 1px darkcyan;" | The count is in, and now I join the crew who wield the mops and pails.
 * Thanks for your support! I pledge to serve both you and Jimbo Wales.

If you have anything you need, then please don't think to hesitate.
 * For I am the very model of a grateful admin designate!
 * ♫ Buck  ets  ofg ✐♪


 * }

Hey..
WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING HERE WHEN YOUR EXAMS ARE GOING ON??!! Anyway if you're free meet me on IRC :P Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  )  17:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Yo dude
Sorry I've taken so long to get back to you. I made a few minor changes to you article on the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 but I couldn't think of anything else really substantial to put in there. If I think of something I will let you know. --Eastlaw 05:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Fair use
Thanks for uploading Image:Brazilinvasion7.png. However, you forgot to include the mandatory fair-use rationale. Without that, the image will be scheduled for deletion shortly. Please ensure that you always add a fair-use justification where required. --Yamla 14:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

appreciate
I really appreciate the table that you have introduced instead of the image. Its very flexible and helpful.--Anshuk 06:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Reservation
I surely don't mind. Thank you for your answer. :) - Darwinek 12:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

good articles on Indian political leaders
Now that is an oxymoron ;). Frankly, I haven't looked at too many. However, both Indira Gandhi and Feroze Gandhi are in a much better shape than when I saw them before, though the tone of the former is on the sympathetic side. You may want to look at Purushottam Das Tandon who was controversial during his life time; Jaipal Reddy is ok but bland - the first was started by me and the second was merged/improved by me but I dunno what shape they are in right now. I'll give my 2 cents worth on Talk:Narendra Modi. --Gurubrahma 13:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

orkut table
somebody seemed to have played around your table.. it is not looking as good as it used to be. Can you check that? thx.--Anshuk 05:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Concordia newsletter
 Concordia Newsletter Community Justice is no more. It has been reformed to Concordia. Membership has been transferred.

Concordia is an organization of editors on Wikipedia that strive to encourage civility and fair treatment among all editors in the Wikipedian community, from the Wikignome to the Wikiholic. The project was designed to have a friendly and helpful environment to support any unfortunate Wikipedians that have become victims of incivility, hostility, or continual disrespect.

We currently need help in getting going, and making the community understand our aims. We work for civility. Nothing more, nothing less.

If you have ideas, let us know at our talk page, or on the IRC channel. We aim to spread civility in every way we can.

Should you wish to unsubscribe to future newsletters, please add your name to Concordia/Do Not Spam.

Thank you for your time. If you need anything, feel free to comment at WT:CCD or come into our IRC channel.

- The Concordia council. Delivered by Ian13 13:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Regarding my RfA and Your Signature
Hey,

Two things:


 * 1) Where did I treat a AfD as a vote?
 * 2) Your signature is broken.

Thanks, Computerjoe 's talk 12:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Diffs? Also, your signature is broke. If I have treated AfDs as votes, it was not intended - I am aware of WP:CON. Computerjoe 's talk 13:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * RfA is a consensus gathering exercise - not a vote :P Computerjoe 's talk 13:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the signature. I was working on it. I have withdrawn my vote as of now. -- Andy123 candy? 13:21, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Now, you understand about which we had a chat. The RfA discussion should not be brought to the talk page - that fragments the discussion, and others are deprived of the benefit of the same in forming opinion. This was one of the reasons, others are too which I shall not tell right now. --Bhadani 15:30, 29 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Copied from User:Computerjoe 's talk page.
 * Hi Computerjoe. I have seen fuddlemark reminding you twice on Afd, that they are not votes. Regards. --Andy123 13:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * PS. Sorry about the sig. :) --Andy123 13:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * In that case, I will abstain from voting. Regards, --Andy123 13:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * We vote to derieve consensus. RfA and AfDs are completely different. --Andy123 13:12, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I am sorry about the signature. I was working on it. ;) -- Andy123 candy? 13:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)