User talk:Sir Oswald Mosley

September 2020
Hello, I'm Sjö. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Fascists, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 18:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

I did include the exact details, including the page it is written on. Stop deleting the truth. You have no knowledge of British politics. Sir Oswald Mosley (talk) 18:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Look at The Times page quoted in the extract I inserted, it can be found online. If you don't know anything about politics, you shouldn't delete it. Donyour research and get an education. Sir Oswald Mosley (talk) 18:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Revert this back to the correct version, NOT YOUR LEFT WING LIES. Sir Oswald Mosley (talk) 18:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Please don't add external links to the see also subheading, it is for internal links to other Wikipedia articles, and please stop adding unsourced information. Dylsss (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 19:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

I didn't, they were already there. You are the one denying facts Sir Oswald Mosley (talk) 19:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.   Dylsss (talk) 19:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

You keep attacking me, when I am putting up factual evidence. Now you're ganging up on me, which is bullying, especially when I am presenting factual evidence. So who is the bully. Sir Oswald Mosley (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

British Union of Fascists
You have been asked to discuss your changes on the talk page: please do so, otherwise your edits will just keep getting reverted. Given your name and your habit of calling people liars, I'm inclined to believe you're not here to build an encyclopedia. If you are, take it to the talk page. — Czello 19:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

I am here to build an encyclopedia of factual information. Not inconsistencies and lies perpetuated from political affiliations, as appears to be the doctrine here. Sir Oswald Mosley (talk) 19:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

I am extremely well versed in British political history, so when I present factual evidence, why is this being deleted by people who have very ittle knowledge of British political history. I have several degrees in this particular field, hence my tongue in cheek username. Sir Oswald Mosley (talk) 19:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)


 * If you think so, then discuss it on the talk page. — Czello 19:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

What is there to talk about when the information is clearly defined. It is this sort of Maskirovka that uneducated lies too consistently about. They have not even reviewed or researched the information added or even discussed with me. Operators keep deleting without verifying why they are deleting. This can only be presumed because of their political affiliations. Had they bothered to check the facts, they would find them correct. So it isn't up to me to prove them, as I already have. It's up to them to disprove the actual documented facts. Which they can't so they delete, like children. Very immature. Sir Oswald Mosley (talk) 19:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

No wonder Wikipedia is losing it's credibility and becoming a joke. It doesn't include factual evidence and is edited by individuals lacking in intelligence. Sir Oswald Mosley (talk) 19:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello, I'm Sjö. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Dylsss that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 19:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)