User talk:Siraped3

Welcome!
Hello, Siraped3, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Dr. Kamol Pansritum, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! TheBritinator (talk) 11:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dr. Kamol Pansritum


A tag has been placed on Draft:Dr. Kamol Pansritum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. TheBritinator (talk) 11:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Advert and COI warnings
Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.  You appear to have a close connection to a subject about which you have written on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Deb (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamol Pansritum (June 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamol Pansritum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Kamol_Pansritum Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:331dot&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kamol_Pansritum reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 09:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Good evening,,
 * Yes, I indeed have two questions to ask, the first concerning the form and the second the substance.
 * On the form: After requesting the correction of the article, I immediately received a message indicating that I had to be patient because there were more than 3300 pending articles waiting for revision. How is it possible, in less than 15 seconds after receiving this first message, to judge the relevance of an article? Is it an algorithm or humans who do not take the time to delve deeper?
 * On the substance, regarding notability: I wrote an article about an internationally renowned surgeon, Kamol Pansritum, who has devoted more than two decades of his career to treating people with gender dysphoria. At a time when these patients were often perceived as suffering from mental disorders, Dr. Pansritum was a pioneer in this field, offering not only medical solutions but also hope to those who saw suicide as their only option.
 * Throughout his career, Dr. Pansritum has operated on thousands of patients from all over the world, giving them a chance to live in accordance with their gender identity. His expertise and innovations have had a profound impact on the field of gender reassignment surgery. He has developed and perfected numerous surgical techniques that are now adopted by major international hospitals, significantly contributing to the evolution of medical practices and improving the quality of life for his patients.
 * Dr. Pansritum's work deserves particular recognition for his dedication and invaluable contributions to medicine and society.
 * Finally, you question the relevance of the articles published by Kamol Pansritum in the medical journals I have cited as references. It is essential to recall that the publication of medical articles is not accessible to just anyone; only professionals whose work meets rigorous criteria can achieve this recognition. The requirements for a physician to publish the results of their research in a medical journal are extremely strict.
 * Here are the general standards that most medical journals follow, which, I am convinced, are even more rigorous than those of Wikipedia::
 * Originality and importance of the research: The submitted research must present original and significant results in the medical field. Studies that build on previous work must make a substantial contribution to existing knowledge or propose new perspectives.
 * Methodological quality: The research must be conducted with rigorous and scientific methods. This includes the study design, data collection, statistical analysis, and interpretation of the results.
 * Clarity and precision of writing: Physicians must write their article clearly, precisely, and in accordance with the journal's editorial standards. Articles must be well-structured and follow a specific format, such as IMRAD (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion).
 * Clinical context and relevance: The research results must be placed in their appropriate clinical context, and their relevance to medical practice or public health must be clearly demonstrated.
 * Research ethics: The research must be conducted in accordance with ethical principles, including informed consent of participants, data confidentiality, and adherence to ethical standards specific to human or animal research.
 * Compliance with guidelines and standards: The research must comply with domain-specific guidelines and standards, such as CONSORT guidelines for randomized controlled trials or STROBE guidelines for observational studies.
 * Peer review: Most medical journals use a peer review process, in which articles are evaluated by independent experts in the field before being accepted for publication. Physicians must be prepared to respond to reviewers' comments and make necessary modifications to their work.
 * I therefore kindly ask for your understanding and support to help ensure that Kamol Pansritum's work finally receives the recognition it deserves on Wikipedia. His work, marked by significant contributions to medicine and a profound impact on the lives of many people, deserves visibility and appreciation commensurate with its importance. It is crucial that pioneering figures like Dr. Pansritum are accurately represented and recognized for their exceptional contributions to the medical field. Siraped3 (talk) 12:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Advice
Further advice: Remove all external links from the text of the article. Such links are characteristic of promotional articles. Deb (talk) 15:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Good morning Deb,
 * As agreed, I removed all the external links from my last proposal, but I haven't seen any changes regarding the acceptance of the article. Could you please provide me with more information? Thank you in advance.
 * Best regards, Siraped3 (talk) 04:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)