User talk:Sirianet

Opening heading
Would you stop replacing the article NESARA with a pack of lies unsourced propaganda? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at NESARA shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:54, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is NESARA. Thank you. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:54, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at NESARA, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 06:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC)