User talk:Siripswich

A tag has been placed on List of porn stars in the UK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Basketball 110   what famous people say  16:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

What is your rationale for adding hangon to this page?  Two One Six Five Five  τʃ 17:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Have a look at Category:British porn stars - your list doesn't add anything. Addhoc (talk) 17:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

 Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Siripswich! My name is Chetblong, and I'm an Administrator on Wikipedia. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Welcome
Hello... welcome to the project. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia. Unfortunately, some of your recent edits have had to be reverted to remove non-neutral phrasing. Please try to avoid adding personal opinions to articles. Thanks again. --Ckatz chat spy  00:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Polly (Parrot) 00:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Gasoline
Hello!

In a recent edit to the page Gasoline, you changed references to the article's subject from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. The same applies to Australian English, Canadian English, et cetera. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any queries about this, please visit the help desk.

Also, please label your edits "minor" if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits. (See Help:Minor edit for an explanation.) Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a "minor edit."

Thank you! —David Levy 00:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --RobertG &#9836; talk 12:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Noble Automotive Ltd has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN aka john lennon  21:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Biscuit constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Pewwer42 Talk  23:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Digestive biscuit. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Pewwer42 Talk  23:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Top Gear Test Track. Antonio Lopez (talk) 01:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Just look at the refferance for top gear test track and you will see you are the one doing the vanaliam by changing me edit.

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.--Hu12 (talk) 12:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Your edit of List of ethnic slurs by ethnicity was reverted as rather strange. `'Míkka>t 05:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Wabs & Mabs
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wabs & Mabs, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Wabs & Mabs. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)