User talk:SiroCallimaco

Welcome!
Hello, SiroCallimaco, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Qaei    &#9742;  10:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Machiavelli and Plato
Hi. Concerning your proposed addition, I have heard such arguments about a hidden influence of Aristotle, who we still don't mention, but do you have any published source for Plato being such an influence? In any case both proposals are somewhat controversial, and not simple/straightforward? I think it is often considered likely that Machiavelli had no Greek.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 06:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Hello, yes I believe Aristotle should be added too. I don't believe these are controversial, as there are references not only to both ancient authors but many secondary sources which state without a doubt that Machiavelli was influenced by them. As an example, Leo Strauss, whose book on Machiavelli shows how de departed from the ancients and their "imaginary republics." SiroCallimaco (talk) 04:03, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Yes he did, but how is showing that someone departed from someone the same as showing that they were influenced by them? All we need to assume is knowledge of the common Scholastic thinking on these matters, let alone Plutarch, Polybius etc. But perhaps you are saying that he was influenced by Plato and Aristotle indirectly (for example through Plutarch, Polybius, and Scholastics)? If so then I think the question arises as to whether this is the way to use these summary boxes surely? And the same question arises if you are saying that he is influenced in a negative way, ie that he saw someone as wrong?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 07:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)