User talk:Sirpent07

June 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chiefland High School, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 03:38, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC)


 * That's not exactly the full story of what happened, is it? You received a vandalism warning at 04:10, 19 June 2014 - see this old version of your talk page. You removed the warning a a few minutes later. Then at 03:37, 21 June 2014, you did this again, and were warned again. You responded on your talk page with "there is a point where I just don't give a shit". At that point you were indefinitely blocked with the comment "Fine, then you don't need to be here" - which seems perfectly reasonable considering your behaviour. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:10, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

The issue with that is I did receive one warning before yes and then received the second one, but after the second one I did not vandalize anymore so I was following instructions, and if you people can't keep your cool because of some words then what kind of administration are you. Because I poured through your policy and know where did I see it say "if you use any kind of vulgar language we will indefinitely ban you"
 * It's not the vulgar language, it's the attitude combined with the vandalism. Saying "there is a point where I just don't give a shit" after your second vandalism warning really does not make you sound like you want to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. And if you don't want to do that then there is no benefit in unblocking your account. If, contrary to all the evidence, you do actually want to help us make this an even better resource, then explaining how you want to help and making it clear that you understand how your behaviour so far has been unacceptable would be a good start - but just playing the innocent victim will get you nowhere. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:42, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Well considering that I've already contributed on Wikipedia in a constructive way multiple times, that would seem to prove it. The only reason it doesn't show up in my history is because I recently had to create a new account because I used an old email that I don't use anymore to create the account, and I forgot all of the login information because I would always use the "log me in automatically" button. The only reason I did this was because I thought it would be a funny prank (XD which it really was I had tons of my friends laughing). So sorry if I "hurt anyones feelings" (which I'm sure I didn't). But if this doesn't seem to have changed your mind then I'm just gonna create a new profile. I don't mind taking 5 minutes to do it. I would rather like to see that people maybe could be a bit more forgiving for tiny pranks and less touchy about a few choiced words. Thank you have a good day.

I agree with Sirpent07 Bensirpent07 (talk) 02:07, 22 June 2014 (UTC)