User talk:Sister Ray Pr

Speedy deletion of "The Outsets"
A page you created, The Outsets, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a band or other musical group, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for musical groups in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 22:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 22:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

The Outsets
You asked me what can be done to the article The Outsets so that it can avoid being deleted. Although some notability is asserted, you may have noticed, in the deletion discussion (in which I encvourage you to participate), that the deletion rationale has to do not with the article itself, but rather with what the article is about: a band that is virtually unknown, even though some of its members are known from other projects. In other words, notability is the problem here: I cannot find non-trivial third-party sources about this band. If you can find anything, please insert the references in the article (see WP:CITE). --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 21:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for Image:IvanJulian.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:IvanJulian.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of THE PUNK/FUNK VOODOO COLLECTION
An article that you have been involved in editing, THE PUNK/FUNK VOODOO COLLECTION, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/THE PUNK/FUNK VOODOO COLLECTION. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? SWik78 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Lovelies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lovelies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lovelies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:11, 18 February 2012 (UTC)