User talk:Sith cub

November 2008
When adding links to material on an external site, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ╟─ Treasury Tag ► contribs ─╢ 13:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:GW2 logo.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:GW2 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 12:53, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:GW2 logonew.png
Thank you for uploading File:GW2 logonew.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, I'm Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Penis envy because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- Rrburke (talk) 00:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vagina dentata. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Deor (talk) 23:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
This is your only warning; if you upload a blatantly unencyclopedic image again, as you did at Ashlawn School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Widefox ; talk 21:40, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Ashlawn School, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Fake image, vandalism, unsourced BLP additions Widefox ; talk 21:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Sith cub, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. User:82.25.63.40 Widefox ; talk 13:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SubliminalRealm


A tag has been placed on SubliminalRealm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — sparklism hey! 12:27, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SubliminalRealm


The article SubliminalRealm has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable, non-notable website/web content. There is no evidence that the subject of this article meets the general notability guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — sparklism hey! 07:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC)