User talk:Sithrules

March 2007
The recent edit you made to The Hobbit constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks – Qxz 07:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

The article Harry Potter Theories on Wikipedia has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Darth griz 98 05:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Joshua Mowll, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 07:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Notability of The Guild of Specialists trilogy
A tag has been placed on The Guild of Specialists trilogy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This article about a book series does not assert the notability or importance of that series.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 07:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deadly (novel series)


The article Deadly (novel series) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no indication of how this might meet WP:NBOOKS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 02:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Saga (comic book)
Welcome to Wikipedia. You removed issue citations from Wikipedia with these edits of yours to, but without providing a rationale for this in your edit summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history.

More importantly, plot sections should summarize material, and not present a detailed blow-by-blow. Since the series is only up to its twelfth issue, adding that level of detail would mean that as the series progresses, the section would grow out of control. Greater detail on the series' plot is already covered in the episode list article.

Also, material on Wikipedia needs to be written in a formal tone, so slang phrases like "their better halves" is inappropriate.

In addition, when adding large amounts of material, please make sure you proofread it to account for things like spelling and punctuation. Sentences should end in punctuation, and words like "successfully" are not capitalized.

Lastly, quotation marks are not needed in ref names.

Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 13:21, 5 July 2013 (UTC)