User talk:Sivart13/sandbox

Hey Sivart13, I will look at your article today and let you know if I see anything OMM93 (talk) 11:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Some studies have suggested that association with syntaxin via SNARE interactions precludes the need for such docking mechanisms. This guy might need a citation.

For your figure, since I figured you did not have chem draw, here are some things I just made. You can use them if you want.

You did a good job. I will look at it again maybe after you present and I get better background information.

So I reviewed the wikipedia article again, and do not have any particular suggestions. There is a sufficient amount of detail, especially since this is a sub section and not the main section of the article. Furthermore, everything is well cited. Good job! OMM93 (talk) 02:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Hey Sivart13! I was just reading over your sandbox one last time. There seems to be an unescessary "<ous]]" under the second subsection. You may want to look at that. Also, this may be wrong but while I was studying for my cell biology final, one slide said that tethering proteins were responsible for "docking," and the snares were more responsible for "fusion." You may want to check the terminology.OMM93 (talk) 03:56, 13 December 2015 (UTC)