User talk:Six and 7 eighths

Talk here:

additional info

 * While I took a look at your edits in the course of reviewing the block, those edits I reverted were not the reason for the block. The block reason is "Ref Desk Troll". A brand-new account joining a contentious community discussion in an area prone to trolls and proposing sanctions against an established editor without even bothering to give reasons of their own is... interesting, to put it mildly. Maybe you could point us towards some of your IP edits so we can establish more of a track record? Huon (talk) 11:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, well ignore the above then. Yes a made an account yesterday, All the easy names were taken, so I used my hat size.  I'm not new though, I love to find citations for facts that others put in the articles.  I normally just edit maybe a dozen or so "Random Articles" when I have time.  Sorta like solving a puzzle.  I look for facts that are not supported, and use google to try to prove that they are facts.  If I can't prove it, I just hit the "Random Article" button and try again.  The "Users Contributions" changes from time to time (I think its because my computer address changes).  The articles are all over the place, its whatever the "Button" selects for me.  Sometimes, when I am not finding citations, I will read the Ref Desks.  Every now and then a question will disappear that has not aged (I think they scroll off when they get old).  I do not like that.  I found yesterday that there is a "Talk" page, and other people don't like it either.  I made an account so I could talk and I voted like lots of others did.  For the reason, I did what some others did and said it was because of another comment.  I voted to have the person stop removing the questions, and let them age like normal. I also told the person that made the poll that it was ironic that my vote to stop having stuff removed....was removed. Six and 7 eighths (talk) 15:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Related discussion: User talk:Ad Orientem/Archive 6 --Guy Macon (talk) 15:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Wow. At first I wished I didn't click on the above link, but now glad I did. I don't know what I did to get the 'Troll' comments, but I don't need any of this. Please close down my account. I should have just kept to googlin' for article references without signing up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Six and 7 eighths (talk • contribs) 22:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The reference desks have been plagued by a Nazi Troll who keeps registering new accounts for a long time now, and one of the unfortunate side effects of the trolling is that people get suspicious about any new account.


 * If you are not the Refdesk Nazi Troll (Please don't be offended. I honestly cannot tell -- the troll acts exactly like an ordinary new user at first, then veers off into some serious trolling), try to understand and accept that a mistake was made and then undone.


 * If you are the Refdesk Nazi Troll, you can email me (link on my talk page) and we can have an offline discussion. I promise that I will never reveal what we talk about. --Guy Macon (talk) 01:39, 11 October 2017 (UTC)