User talk:Sixonline

Welcome
Hello Sixonline and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Sharron Davies, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Eagleash (talk) 17:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC) Eagleash (talk) 17:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

''Please do not remove referenced content without providing a fuller explanation, add unreferenced content to a WP:BLP or add WP:OR. Thank you. It seems all your contributions have been to Davies's article; if you have any sort of connection to her, you *must* read WP:COI and maake the necessary declarations. This is not a reflection upon any individual editor but just one of the ways in which Wikipedia tries to ensure neutralty.'' Eagleash (talk) 17:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for being some issues to my attention. I have read the rules as suggested which will now allow me to make the changes to the Sharron Davies Wikipedia page which is both factually incorrect and misleading. Sixonline (talk) 06:13, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Your recent edits to Sharron Davies could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 20:05, 29 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I have tried to contact Wikipedia to discuss the issues but receive generic responses. I have spent a lot of time doing the research and have provided citations etc but constant defamatory content against a person is wrong and should not be allowed. I will now attempt the dispute resolution process Sixonline (talk) 03:22, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You cannot remove information supported by reliable sources and replace it with unreferenced opinion &/or original research. Restoring your version of a page after it has been reverted and an explanation provded is edit-warring and can lead to the loss of editng privileges. Follow WP:BRD. You say you intend to, but it is not clear whether you have done so. Davies's children are non-notable; I.e.they have no Wikipedia article and the conventionn is that their names are not included.
 * It also seems very much like you have some sort of connection to Davies and therefore WP:COI must be complied with and it is requested that you do not edit the page further until you have clarified this aspect. Please feel free to make edit request via the article talk page. Please see WP:Edit request for how to proceed in this respect. Via the talk page you can also provde an explanation as to what you find 'defamatory' and what (and why) you think it is 'hearsay'. Eagleash (talk) 16:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Again, please do not edit the page directly until you have clarified the position with regard to COI. Edits made otherwise may be challenged or remeoved. Eagleash (talk) 12:14, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I do NOT know this person. I follow her on Twitter & Instagram, and taking an interest making sure the content is consistent, true/accurate and protects the person from people writing fake news or relating to the transgender debate only generically and not infringing on any persons legal rights. I will continue to edit the page to protect the content, as I have now explained. Sixonline (talk) 03:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * See your edit above where you acknowledged WP:COI applied to you (here), saying Thank you for being some issues to my attention. I have read the rules as suggested which will now allow me to make the changes to the Sharron Davies Wikipedia page which is both factually incorrect and misleading. Also you have added information to the article that gives the appearance of personal knowledge, such as the number of rounds of IVF the subject had, the exact number of surgeries she has had, the exact number of Olympics she has covered in her presenting career, her children's info including their names/schools/scholarships/level of athletic competition achieved (diff). You have essentially edited no other article (except this).
 * Your first edit was adding her new fitness website, saying without any reference that she "has more than 40 years of elite-level training and competing in the world’s biggest competitions, and she knows what’s required to help people get a better quality of life through regular exercise and diet." You have also gone to some lengths to remove any criticism of her like this.
 * Then we have the edits summaries such as this and vandalism like this. Solipsism 101 (talk) 19:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I have made myself clear, and have you heard of email, Twitter etc? I will not continue this dialog with you Solipsism 101. I've made my position clear and you need to ensure that you have accurate information. Which is what I have added. I have performed no vandalism like you did but I had put in the wrong place which has now been resolved Sixonline (talk) 01:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)