User talk:Sixxfeetundr

May 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joshua Rogers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.  Dwpaul  Talk   02:09, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Any reposting of personal phone numbers will result in a block. Don't do that again.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Joshua Rogers, you may be blocked from editing.  Dwpaul  Talk   17:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A Leven


The article A Leven has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTDICT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 17:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of A Leven


A tag has been placed on A Leven requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Dwpaul  Talk   17:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)