User talk:Sizer25/Roman philosophy/Michaelchan1998 Peer Review

the article is well written with, good ideas and good sources there seems to be a lack of words in the article but other than that it is rather good there could be some extra parapraghs and more details in the paragraphs that exist but all in total it is rather interesting and smartly written piece of work

Instructor Feedback: Draft/Peer Review 1
Michaelchan1998 this is a very short review that doesn't give your peer a lot of helpful, constructive feedback. You're absolutely right that more content needs to be added, and you are positive in your wording, but there is not much that your peer can do with this advice. Make sure to be specific and go through your peer's work carefully - you say 'good' a lot, but what is good about it? What extra paragraphs would you like to see? What details could be added? I can see that you began writing in the peer review template that Wikipedia generated for you, but I'm not sure what happened to it or why you didn't go through and answer the questions provided in the template. In your next round of peer reviews, make sure you understand how to access the template and provide your classmate with critiques that will help improve their article. Grade: 11/20 Gardneca (talk) 12:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)