User talk:Sjö/Archive 8

"Image of unknown origin posted on a site with user-generated content"
In | this edit you tag several screen-shot images I uploaded to the Bros page for UK certifications, several years ago. As the references are titled, these screen-shot images were taken from search results on https://www.bpi.co.uk/, which is (or was at that point) the official site of the British Phonographic Industry, who issue certifications in the United Kingdom. The reason I cited screen-shots of search results, rather than link directly to that site, is the URL linked would only direct to the search page, and not display the search results - the user would then need to manually enter the band name to display these. I also did this because, at that time at least, the site was often temporarily offline. While you may dispute the correctness of referencing in this way, I thought I made it clear in the referencing which site the screen-shot was taken from, so that readers could, if they wished to, ascertain the accuracy of the search results themselves.Nqr9 (talk) 12:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I see, but it's still not reliable as a source. You can now link directly to the certification like I did here. I was perhaps extra careful about sourcing because of socks adding unsourced and sometimes clearly incorrect information about certifications etc. Sjö (talk) 13:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Irreducible complexity
I notice that you didn't bother to include any references or other support for your reversion. Axl ¤ [Talk] 11:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually, per WP:BURDEN it's you who have to show sources that support your addition. I don't dispute that irreducible complexity is used as an argument against evolution, but there are other arguments e.g. that an increase in order would violate the second law of thermodynamics and there are also even less sophisticated arguments about complexity. Sjö (talk) 14:14, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Discrimination vs Incrimination
I thought Talk is for discssion, not for removing messages. And By the way, My Contribution Is Perfectly Constructive! Here is the Proof: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/incrimination IN And DIS are opposite meaning prefixes. What is not constructive - is to mess up the language, making more harm to the world! Good luck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.140.230.171 (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I believe what you say can best be described as an Etymological fallacy but your edit was removed mostly because it wasn't about how to improve the article. An article talk page isn't supposed to be a forum for general discussion or to express the personal views of the editors, but to discuss changes to its associated article. Sjö (talk) 20:07, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

WP:UAA
Hi, Sjö. I have blocked the German username you didn't want to translate. Thanks for reporting it, and I have to admit it made me laugh. To my ear, there's something so formal about the German language! :-) Bishonen &#124; talk 20:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC).

You are ignorance of islam
Learn the meaning of islam.islam says that Islam existed before prophet Muhammad and this claim can't be refuted. kafir should not say what Islam is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:A068:812C:E474:8E28:86A5:8903 (talk) 08:40, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I made no claim about Islam. The changes I made was to Great Mosque of Mecca and a building is not a religion. Also, the building is important to Muslims of all branches. Because of this, the article should be written in a neutral manner, and include differing views, including those from secular sources. Sjö (talk) 10:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

reported you for bullying
a senior member is investigating your conduct, on grounds your removing sourced content, they also believe your richard3120 please top bullying me if you please any info is not correct please provide printed proof to disprove — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronniewalker89 (talk • contribs) 08:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17


Hello ,


 * News
 * The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.


 * Discussions of interest
 * Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
 * db-blankdraft was merged into G13 (Discussion)
 * A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
 * There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.


 * Reminders
 * NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD  because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.


 * NPP Tools Report
 * Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
 * copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
 * The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828 Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review. Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Bros
Just to say, the Smash Hits Poll Winners Party awards are probably true, but I can understand why you reverted them, as it's hard to believe anything a certain editor adds. I'll try and dig out the sources for them - it was the last time Craig Logan appeared in public with the band, so they almost certainly won something, given that they were the biggest teen pop band in the UK at the time, and Smash Hits was the UK's biggest teen pop music magazine. Richard3120 (talk) 18:01, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, it's come to the point where I presume that anything changed by the long-term vandal is fake. It would be great if you could find some sources for the Smash Hits award, though. Sjö (talk) 06:33, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

United Patriots Front edit reversion
I was a pending changes reviewer for that edit, which I approved with misgivings. There's an active agenda war in that article, and I'm not approving any more edits by unregistered users there. Yes, I erred that time. Your reversion stands. Sbalfour (talk) 15:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

ethymology citation
i don't think that mentioning that citation is a french word ant that citations are often famous is vandalism. you don't have the impression to be out of proportions because i do

--90.13.137.168 (talk) 19:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

That is not what vandalism is you should watch the definition you seem to need a reminder. Oh! And it is also a french word!

--90.13.137.168 (talk) 19:37, 26 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Your addition were unsourced and not proper English. At the very least they were not an improvement. The "citation" the article is about is very much an English word as this is the English Wikipedia, and the "oftenly famous" tagged on to the end of the sentence makes no sense in English. Like in Procuring (prostitution) your sentence made no sense, which is why I removed it. My take is that if something walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it probably is a duck. Sjö (talk) 19:55, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

ok not proper english i can work with that i verify oftenly before editing in "Bakarkhani"

so if it doesn't exist you should correct it.

and i am french so if i tell you citation is a french word, this is. it's come from the verb "citer", citation is the action of "citer". Of course i am speakin about the ethymology of this word nothing more, only its origin.

and for pimping i will paste what i wrote on the talk page but still thank you for answerring unlike CLCStudent

i am french i am writing from france right now so i don't think that correcting a definition of a supposedly french word written by ignorants is unconstructive on the contrary it is letting false definition or word that doesn't exist that is unconstructive

so pimp in french NEVER existed that ALWAYS have been to be "pimpant" ou "pimpante" and that doesn't refer to the action of alluring but to the fact to attract attention extend in french to be eventually seductive or elegant but it's first sens is to attract the eye, to be full of light (in french we say about a woman that she is "lumineuse", like if light emanate from her), of life, it is often use to designate women or jewelry. Looking for the cnrtl definition i even saw that a cleaning company is called pimpant. If pimpant was an image we would put - all around the subject like around the maçonnique star (mason's star? or masson's star maybe?) in the aim to show that the subject attract the eye, the attention and the fact that it is "lumineux" (kind of shiny)

so i don't know who are the ignorant who call me vandal to correct uncorrect word and definition but i call that constructive

just for you to know clcstudent and Sjö after the first undoing i have watched the definition that the cnrtl (centre national de ressources textuelles et lexicales) give about pimpant(e) and what i have written is a good definition i can paste you their definitions in private but i m sure seeing your corrections that you prefer false that you will never understand a word but still i propose

To finish, i see that clcstudent you were faster to use your all powerfull privileges to call me vandal and unconstructive than to answer to a polite talk

do you know why my contributions soon undone have been constructive ?

because you already erase that mention to a false french verb "pimp" and replaced it by the adverb "pimpant" like it should and like i wrote. Now it just miss a true definition.

And.... Yeah... i'm not a duck just a not english native who has refered herself to an article that should've been corrected long ago if false.

finally it seems that i don't speak and write that much bad for a non native english?

Well, Good Evening to you anyway. That wasn't proper english i can't deny on that

--90.13.137.168 (talk) 20:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

In the same time the fact to be full of light, like if light emanate from someone it's not an english concept, there is no equivalent so yeah it's not proper english but still, it's the half of the définition of being pimpant(e) and it's a french concept explicate pretty well, with english words and relatively correct sentences. i'm sure that you have been able to understand the concept of being "lumineux(se)" + attract the eye = pimpant(e) = original definition that you can extend in the sens of attracting the attention to seductive, elegant and in the sens "lumineux(se)" to freshness, full of joy, full of life...

--90.13.137.168 (talk) 21:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The thing is that you would have to include a citation in your edits. Verifiability and Reliable sources are important on Wikipedia. You don't have to try to convince me, but you have to add a source that support your changes. Sjö (talk) 12:18, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Just curious
I don't get the joke that there are two flags for the Czech Republic. I'm Chinese and didn't really learn much about European politics, may you explain for me please? Woshiyiweizhongguoren (🇨🇳) 10:52, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * See the first sentence in Flag of the Czech Republic. The two flags are intended to confuse the reader (and maybe amuse when they figure it out). Sjö (talk) 11:53, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Cats and Islam
This is related to my edit that you reversed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_cats#Hygiene_and_neutering

After doing a bit of research, there are differences of opinion regarding the issue of feeding cats as Muslims. Since cats are carnivores by nature, one should not force them to abstain from meat products if they cannot be obtained as Halal products, because that is animal abuse and goes against the teachings of the Qura'an and the Prophet (PBUH). That being said, there is clear benefit in buying traditional pet food because Halal pet food is expensive and difficult to attain. See: https://www.seekersguidance.org/answers/hanafi-fiqh/permissible-purchase-cat-food/. I think the paragraph about feeding pets halal foods on that page should be removed to prevent confusion or misinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:29DF:EAC0:C85E:AD21:6650:1AC2 (talk) 17:21, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia aims to describe the world as it is. If there is halal cat food we should report it. The only concern is that it could be WP:UNDUE, that is not mentioned enough in reliable sources. If that is the case it could be removed, but in my opinion it's not misinformation to simply report the existence of something. Sjö (talk) 10:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

moderaterna
värför? why did you revert my edit, "En utgångspunkt är att Sverige behöver en integrationspolitik som syftar till att invandrare ska komma in i det svenska samhället. Det har länge tvärtom funnits en bärande idé att integration handlar om en ”process från två håll”, där invandrare och infödda ska integreras i ett nytt multikulturellt samhälle. Den ansatsen har varit förrädisk och felaktig. Självklart påverkas hela samhället av invandring, ofta positivt, ibland negativt. Men politiken måste helt och fullt fokusera på att de som kommer till Sverige ska tillåtas och förväntas bli en del av det svenska samhället." this is literaly their own words he rejects multiculturalism it very important and relevant thing for the readers to know Johansweden27 (talk) 07:11, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:OR. Does he say in the article that he rejects multiculturalism? No, he doesn't, that is your own interpretation.Sjö (talk) 07:13, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok, what about "Ulf Kristersson also rejected CRITICISED or WAS CRITICAL TO multiculturalism" does that work for you? Johansweden27 (talk) 07:25, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If you like, but I'm not happy with using a primary source. Also I think that it is WP:UNDUE to pick that debate article which IMO isn't proportional to the coverage in media. This is also because it is a Social Democratic tactic to liken the (former) Alliance parties to the Sweden Democrats, which means that coverage in our article must be very neutral. Sjö (talk) 13:58, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Mistakes in the Swedish Wiki I can't correct
I am blocked for life on Swedish Wikipedia, which is a bit frustrating, as some important articles (on Jewish matters) have serious errors.

E.g. I'm not sure how many days Easter is celebrated in the Christian calendar, (Good Friday, Easter Monday) but I know that the Jewish festival of Passover is seven days in Israel and eight days in the diaspora. The English article is correct: the Swedish article is wrong (The Swedish article assumes Passover is only one day).

Jewish sabbaths and festivals start at sunset. Their conclusion is extended to nightfall.

But the Swedish article gives wrong information again. It says that Passover finishes at sunset.

You can always get the correct information by looking at the English article. RPSM (talk) 14:24, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Which Swedish article do you mean? Sjö (talk) 15:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * are the errors you refer to in the Swedish versions of Easter or Passover? --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 15:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Sjö, do you think, after all these years, there's any mileage at all in reopening RPSM's ban? What if he was initially constrained, with a mentor's oversight, to certain articles while he proves himself? His en: record is promising --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 15:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

The lead of the Swedish article follows:

"Pesach (hebr. פֶּסַח), det osyrade brödets högtid, firas till minne av uttåget ur Egypten och är en av de viktigaste judiska högtiderna. Det firas samma dag varje år i den judiska kalendern, nämligen den 15:e Nisan (se Andra Mosebok 12:6). "Pesach kallas ibland judisk påsk. Eftersom den judiska kalendern är en modifierad månkalender, den beräknas efter fullmånen, infaller Pesach vid olika tider enligt den gregorianska kalendern.

"Pesach (hebr. פֶּסַח) the festival of unleavened bread, is celebrated in memory of the Exodus from Egypt and is one of the most important Jewish festivals. It is celebrated on the same day every year in the Jewish calendar, on the 15th of "Nisan (see Exodus 12:6). Sometimes Pesach is called the Jewish Easter (Swedish: Jewish Påsk). Because the Jewish calendar is a modified lunar calendar, calculated according to the full moon, Pesach occurs on different dates according "to the Gregorian calendar."

Deutoronomy 16:3 gives the commandment (mitsva for a seven day festival of unleavened bread.

"The Prohibition of Chametz


 * 1) Rav David Brofsky

"The prohibition of chametz is unique. Chametz is different from other prohibited foods both quantitatively and qualitatively. "The Rambam enumerates the various mitzvot and prohibitions relevant to Pesach in the Mishneh Torah. Aside from the sixteen mitzvot associated with the Korban Pesach (see the introduction to Hilkhot Korban Pesach), he lists another six commandments that relate to chametz: "1) the prohibition of eating chametz from midday of the fourteenth of Nissan (Devarim 16:3); "2) the prohibition of eating chametz for all seven days of Pesach (Shemot 13:3); "3) the prohibition of eating a mixture (ta’arovet) containing chametz for all seven days of Pesach (Shemot 12:20) [the Ramban, in his comments on the Rambam’s Sefer Ha-mitzvot (negative commandment 198), disagrees, arguing that there "is no separate prohibition of a ta’arovet chametz]; "4) the prohibition of “seeing” chametz in one’s possession during the seven days of Pesach (Shemot 13:7); "5) the prohibition of having chametz “found” in one’s procession during the seven days of Pesach (Shemot 12:19). The Rabbis understand this and the previous prohibition as referring to owning chametz during Pesach.

RPSM (talk) 13:56, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

"Datum för Pesach "Som alla judiska helger varar Pesach från solnedgång till solnedgång och börjar på kvällen före de angivna startdatumen.[1]

"Date for Pesach

"As is the case for all Jewish festivals Pesach lasts from sunset to sunset and starts on the evening prior to the gvien start date."

Not according to what I was taught.

Shabbos and Yom Tovim (festivals on which no work may be done) are concluded when three stars are visible in the night sky on a cloudless night. Otherwise astronomical calculations are used to reckon when that would be.

The reason is not to be in a hurry to conclude the sabbath or festival. RPSM (talk) 14:18, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

In the body of the Swedish article "Pesach" there is correct info in the body of text, but the lead is as I have quoted above and, I think, misleading.

Concerning the time Passover concludes, this is governed by a voluntary desire to extend the holiday and its observance, and although the day finishes at sunset, times given in calendars for the ending of a Sabbath or festival are nightfall, when three starts are visible in the night sky (on a clear day).

All this makes for a thorough knowledge of Jewish law being required before editng an article intended to be authoritative.

Non-Jews are welcome to edit articles on Wikipedia, but it is not certain they have studied Jewish law (halakha) in depth.

https://www.hebcal.com/home/96/what-is-havdalah-or-when-does-shabbat-end  RPSM (talk) 15:48, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * No, I will not "correct" the Swedish article sv:Pesach except to clarify in the lede that the celebration starts on the 15th of Nisan. : And no, I don't think that RPSM should be unblocked on the Swedish Wikipedia. RPSM was bocked for being disruptive in many different ways, and this conversation and other recent edits have shown that the same editing pattern remains. RPSM edits on svwiki included that he edited with a non-neutral POV, inserted walls of text with little or none relevance to the matter being discussed, didn't provide sources, considered his own unsourced opinions to be authoritative facts, didn't answer questions, didn't indent in discussions and objected to non-jews editing articles pertaining to Judaism (unless they were experts on the subject of Jewish law). RPSM also had a problem with reading comprehension when reading Swedish, leading him to find errors in articles where they didn't exist, and anti-semitism in edits where they didn't exist.
 * This thread was started because RPSM didn't read and understand the Swedish article. When asked a direct question he responded with a wall of unattributed copied text, leaving it to me to figure out how that related to the question at hand. As you can see this addition wasn't indented. Instead of providing a source he told me what he was taught as if that is a reliable source. His 15:48 12 April addition is just too little, too late.
 * There have been other examples. This is an example of RPSM adding a wall of text for some unclear purpose, and this is an addition of an unsourced and very POV statement. In my opinion, if RPSM was unblocked on svwiki he would continue his disruptive editing and eventually be blocked again. For that reason I don't think that RPSM should be unblocked, even with constraints. Sjö (talk) 06:54, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * This thread was started because the Swedish article gave the clear understanding in the lede of the Swedish article that Passover (Pesach) is a one day festival. That was my understanding from reading it and it has now been corrected. Many thanks. Many Christians come to an article on Passover because they wonder about how it was celebrated in temple times when Jesus was alive, and what the Jewish observance was and is. Was Jesus Christ crucified on the 14th of Nisan April 3 - 33 or the 15th April? The essential point is clarity and truth and to remove any possible misunderstandings. RPSM (talk) 09:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Just to clarify about the Swedish article Pesach and the English article Passover - both of them say the festival lasts from sunset to sunset, which is true. But in actual practice, a weekly sabbath or a Yom Tov is extended by a few minutes at the start and at the conclusion by extending the concluding time regular orthodox Jews observe from sunset to nightfall (three stars visible in the sky). Haredim have another custom that adds on even more time. The basic principe is that a sabbath may not be shortened, but it is meritorious to extend it. The proper thing to do is to mention this on the talk page of the article, and those who are knowledgeable will correct it.

As you understand Norwegian, I include a link to an article on a dissertation on antisemitism from Morgenposten. No ill will intended. https://morgenbladet.no/boker/2016/02/den-unorske-joden Regards, RPSM (talk) 12:22, 22 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Why on Earth would you add that completely unrelated article to this thread if it isn't to tell me in an underhanded way that I'm an anti-semite. If you think I'm an anti-semite at least have the guts and common decency to say so. RPSM, I believe that you are a liability to the project and that the net effect of your edits is bad for Wikipedia, not only because of this personal attack, but for all the reasons I listed above.
 * You should know that while before I wouldn't support RPSM getting unblocked on svWikipedia, now I will oppose any suggestion that his ban is lifted. Sjö (talk) 19:50, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I think I should put here that I had no intention of implying or suggesting you ever were or are an anti-Semite. This is because I have not detected or seen or heard that you, Sjö, have ever done or said anything of a racist or antisemitic nature. The article, for the benefit of those who do not understand Swedish is about a doctoral dissertation by someone who works at the Holocaust Centre in Norway on antisemitism focusing on mainstream media in the 1930s. A cartoonist, praised after the WWII for his lampoons of Nazis during the war, on researching his pre-war production in the 1930s, is discovered to have been producing the caricatures typical of the time (Jews with disproportionsally large noses). The main point in the dissertation is that this kind of antisemitism was not done by a few odd individuals on the fringe, but was standard fare in regular newsapers and weekend satirical magazines. My comment "No ill will intended" was to point out that I meant no harm. Regards, RPSM (talk) 12:10, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * So you want me to believe that you intended no ill will when you out of the blue linked to an article about widespread antisemitism? That's about as believable as a schoolyard bully saying "It was only a joke". Like I've said before: I've tried to assume good faith, and when that failed to assume no clue but your edits have made that impossible.
 * Apparently I must repeat the request I made on your talk page, but in stronger words. Never contact me on my talk page again (unless Wikipedia guidelines requires it) as nothing good will come of you editing here. As you have been told on Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance, if a user asks you not to edit their user pages, it is sensible to respect their request. The relevant guideline is USERTALK and the sections in WP:TPG it links to. I will consider your editing here a breach of Etiquette. Sjö (talk) 07:33, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I think I can manage now. The mistake remaining in the Swedish article comes from copying from the English article "Passover" where there is a mistake there. It is very important to some people to observe Jewish sabbaths and festivals correctly and time - commencement and conclusion - is a vital factor. The mistake has been there for a number of years now. I shall not need to contact you again. RPSM (talk) 12:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * My statement "Never contact me on my talk page again" was unambiguous, but I'll repeat it again: Never contact me on my talk page again (unless Wikipedia guidelines requires it). Your recent edit here made me believe that WP:ETIQUETTE apparently is another guideline that you don't think applies to you. There was absolutely no reason to inform me of your edits on Passover, unless perhaps if you intended to annoy me. You have succeded, if that was your intention. Like you said: you do not need to contact me again, and I repeat that I don't want you to write on this talk page. Sjö (talk) 10:34, 28 June 2019 (UTC)→

India
Will you ever visit India? Yellow alligator (talk) 04:14, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I have no plans at the moment. Sjö (talk) 14:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scandinavian Airlines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SEK ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Scandinavian_Airlines check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Scandinavian_Airlines?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Jesus H Christ OR
Any idea what to do about this guy? He's not engaging (yet) on his talk page, and I'm too close to 3RR range for yet another revert. Clearly his "citation" does not support the claim. David Brooks (talk) 16:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It looks like good faith editing, but they just don't seem to know about Wikipedia policies. I'm assuming good faith for now, and hope that they will reply on their talk page. In the meantime, I'm going to revert their edits again, since I only have one revert of that content. Sjö (talk) 18:15, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * As you may have seen, I've realized there's a different possible interpretation of the edit. Hoping the user can clarify their intention. David Brooks (talk) 22:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I didn't think of that angle. I'm on the fence right now, having just read your latest post, but I'll think about it. Sjö (talk) 04:39, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi there
Hi, I am the person that keeps adding to this article. In ancient Greek, there are no principles in where the definite articles go (definite articles are 24 cases of the word "the"). Where we know the difference is in the case ending of the definite articles and the noun and verbs(there are two paradigms to learn these). The eta as you pointed out and I keep adding has a harsh breathing mark over it rendering a breathing sound to make 'ay to hay. The definite articles range from masculine, feminine and neuter in singular and plural then divided into: nominative, genative, dative and accusative. For nouns only. What you said about the placement of the hay in between is modern Greek. So, I guess you and I correct there too.

I would like to discuss this further with you or David in detail somewhere, if I may. I don't know how we'd exchange email addresses. But I would like to correct your understanding of Koine Greek.

49.197.49.39 (talk) 08:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC) Andrew W.
 * The article's talk page is a fine place for that discussion; please take it up there if you wish and try to understand the actual nature of the objections. For myself, I'm not for a moment disputing Ancient Greek grammar or orthography, which is easily verified anyway (even online). David Brooks (talk) 13:33, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you, but I'm not interested. I't really doesn't matter how Christ's name was written; what matters is what reliable sources have to say about the connection to the etymology of Jesus H Christ. Sjö (talk) 06:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

why are you threatening me
hi their just wondering why your threatening me and you reverted my edit as sourced from www.brosmusic.co.uk/ publication and articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.199.7.135 (talk • contribs)
 * It's kind of sad to see how you are obsessed with Bros and how you fail to understand the basic rules about editing Wikipedia. Please take a look at your reasons and reconsider your editing here. You are welcome to edit as long as follow the rules, especially those about using sources that are acceptable according to Wikipedia standards. Sjö (talk) 19:54, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18


Hello ,

, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
 * WMF at work on NPP Improvements
 * Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
 * Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
 * Reliable Sources for NPP

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
 * Backlog drive coming soon


 * News
 * Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.


 * Discussions of interest
 * A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
 * There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
 * What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

U good
? Sim raaa ansmsk (talk) 06:07, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Cloetta
https://da.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloetta — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spidy30 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Why do you post this link here? Sjö (talk) 06:41, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Malaco
https://da.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaco Spidy30 (talk) 22:56, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Why do you post this link here? Sjö (talk) 06:41, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Cloetta
https://da.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloetta Spidy30 (talk) 22:57, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Why do you post this link here? Sjö (talk) 06:41, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Ferrara Candy Company is part of The Italian Company Ferrero
https://www.ferrerocareers.com/ Spidy30 (talk) 23:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Ferrara is owned by Ferrero, as the article says. But it is a separate company, was founded in the US, and has always been located in the US which makes it an American company. Besides, the link you provided says nothing about Ferrara as far as I can see. If you want to argue for "Italian" take it up on the article talk page, but I don't think that you will be succesful. Sjö (talk) 06:41, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

nordjyske jernbaner (North Jutland Railways) in North Jutland.y
(North Jutland Railways) in North Jutland this is major Railways in North Jutland. And this is your first and final warning if you make any vandalism on a page I have create, so I need to block you if you do that again, and for the next time, just think before you do it, and you Think before you do it, for it has/have consequences my friend Spidy30 (talk) 12:36, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You aren't an administrator, so you can't block me but perhaps you mean that you will report me to the administrators' noteboard. I would strongly advise against it. The article is about rail transportation in Denmark, not rail transportation in North Jutland. Also, you introduced an English name that appears to be incorrect. Sjö (talk) 12:51, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

The Major North Jutland Railways in North Jutland in Denmark
I live in Denmark, and I know they are Railway in North Jutland, and The North Jutland Railway is The Major operators in The North Jutland Railways and The owner of The North Jutland Railsways is Nordjyllands Trafikselskab ( Nordjylland's traffic company) (North Jutland’s traffic company) (North Jutland traffic company) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordjyske_Jernbaner https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vendsyssel_Line https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DSB_(railway_company) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_transport_in_Denmark https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aalb%C3%A6k_station https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vendsyssel https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skagensbanen https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hirtshalsbanen https://da.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordjyske_Jernbaner https://da.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordjyllands_Trafikselskab Spidy30 (talk) 13:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * I have never said or written anything that contradicts that, except that "The North Jutland Railway" is not used by any reliable source that I can find. English-language websites use Nordjyske_Jernbaner.
 * Any further discussion about the contents of the article should take place at Talk:Nordjyske_Jernbaner or Talk:Rail transport in Denmark. Sjö (talk) 08:28, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Cloetta
Cloetta is actually original not a Swedish company, but Cloetta is actually original a Danish company. https://da.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clo%C3%ABtta Spidy30 (talk) 13:59, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The only change I made to Cloetta here was to add that it was founded in Denmark. What's your point?
 * However, any discussion about the contents of the article should really take place at Talk:Cloetta. You are welcome to add your thoughts there, but please explain your reasoning behind the above assertion. Reliable sources will help your case. Sjö (talk) 08:35, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Malaco
Malaco company is actually original not a Swedish company, or Danish and  Swedish company Malaco, but Malaco is actually original a Danish company or Maybe a Danish and Swedish company Malaco. https://da.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaco Spidy30 (talk) 14:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I think you are wrong. Malaco was founded in Sweden and has always been located in Sweden. The brand is now owned by a Swedish company. The only thing that connects it to Denmark is the nationality of its founders. [Here are ten US companies founded by foreigners and I don't think that you would have any success convincing Wikipedia editors that they, therefore, aren't American.
 * However, any discussion about the contents of the article should really take place at Talk:Malaco. You are welcome to add your thoughts there, but please explain your reasoning behind the above assertion. Reliable sources will help your case.Sjö (talk) 08:43, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Malaco was actually founded in Copenhagen, Denmark  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spidy30 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)


 * I copied this discussion to talk:Malaco. Please continue there. Sjö (talk) 14:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019


Hello ,

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important. Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR. The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever. NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so  you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations. Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for  the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging. Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway. School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
 * WMF at work on NPP Improvements
 * QUALITY of REVIEWING
 * Backlog
 * Move to draft
 * Notifying users
 * PERM
 * Other news

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks
Yet another Lenovo laptop that moves my text around. Doug Weller talk 10:02, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

you need help
honestly, I just wanna say you're insane for waking up at 6 am every morning and monitoring the list of soups wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:648:8100:1E88:140A:29E5:5B71:CC02 (talk) 06:28, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

you have my ip, come fight
you have my ip, come fight me irl. we can talk over a bowl of soup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:648:8100:1E88:140A:29E5:5B71:CC02 (talk) 06:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Spidy30
Looks like it might be time for administrator intervention and a longer block, this user has had enough final warnings and just makes a mess of Wikipedia. Certainly if they make one more junk unsourced edit I would take it there. —DIYeditor (talk) 00:13, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * You might have seen that I gave them a level 4 warning after their shenanigans at Eat-More. This has gone beyond anything that can be taken as good faith edits. Spidy30's edits are IMO subtle vandalism. Sjö (talk) 05:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Risk management, you may be blocked from editing. Your edit tripped a filter on RC I'm Caker18 ! I edit Wikipedia sparingly. (talk) 11:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Did you even check my edit or did you rely on the automated edit filter alone? I reverted obvoius spam from a promotional SPA. Please remove the spam your edit restored.Sjö (talk) 11:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry! I screwed up... I was checking an organization page before your edit so I got mixed up. It's reverted now. Thanks for your edits! :) I'm Caker18 ! I edit Wikipedia sparingly. (talk)  11:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Preserve the comment as evidence. I'm Caker18 ! I edit Wikipedia sparingly. (talk)  11:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * You might want to be more careful with what you revert. This is an obscene personal attack that you restored. Twice! And warned the editor that was attacked. Not all blanking is bad. Sjö (talk) 11:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Did you even read the second comment? That second comment was from Draa Kul, not me! Jesus I'm Caker18 ! I edit Wikipedia sparingly. (talk)  02:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by "the second comment" because I can't figure out which edit you mean? Draa Kul has made no edit to this talk page, and on their own talk page they only made three automated Wikipedia Adventure edits and blanked the page once . You, on the other hand, restored the personal attack here and here and then warned Draa Kul here and here. The attack wasn't added by Draa Kul but by . You also restored spam at Risk management. Like I said, be more careful with what you revert. Everybody make mistakes, and it's wise to acknowledge them and learn from them. Sjö (talk) 04:59, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The reply message... I'm Caker18 ! I edit Wikipedia sparingly. (talk)  05:16, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
 * That answer was not helpful. Which reply message? Are you saying that one of these messages was added by Draa Kul? Sjö (talk) 10:31, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Reporting of sock puppetry
Dear member

I have just been notified that you reported me for sock puppetry, why have you done this and what grounds, could you kindly let me know, as I like to defend my self — Preceding unsigned comment added by Choiyang (talk • contribs)

Reported this member under the wiki hounding policy
Dear its with regret I reported you under the hounding and wiki bulling policy, you reported me for nothing, the only thing I can find that I undid of your was the bros smash hits poll winners, Bros won 3 awards if you obtain the smash hits magazine, issue November 1-14 1989 its the official publication of the Smash hits awards poll winners party, if you like to see the full publication please go to this website  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Choiyang (talk • contribs) 12:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Bros page vandalism
Hi Sjö, I believe that your recent sock puppet accusation for user Choiyang may be inaccurate, for the reasons I've specified on their talk page. I too jumped to the same conclusion when I saw the Bros page had recently been edited by someone citing Smash Hits (as TomWatkins1970 often does, though only in the edit summary, and his references are never specific [and the information is totally false]); but I think in this instance that the user is genuine. If you look at the citations they've added in their recent edits (admittedly, not done perfectly), they link to pages that support their claims.Nqr9 (talk) 13:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I think that Choiyang's edits after the report have confirmed my suspicions. I wasn't 100 % sure at the time, but when I looked at Choiyang's previous edits they had the same areas of interest as Cathparr, the sock before. Now, I am sure. Sjö (talk) 18:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You were probably right, then. I haven't paid close attention to their edits recently - I got a bit tired of doing so a while back.  I didn't actually read the sites they had cited in recent edits, but was surprised that they led to online sources - as usually, they just add 'Smash Hits' and some other gibberish in their edit summaries, rather than add citations to their edits.  Attacking those who revert their edits is definitely their MO.  I think that whoever is behind the account is seriously disturbed.Nqr9 (talk) 11:24, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Vandal IP at BLPs
Hi, Mr. Lake. I've blocked for a month. Bishonen &#124; talk 20:47, 27 August 2019 (UTC).
 * Thanks, it's appreciated. Sjö (talk) 20:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Have you read WP:ERA]] recently?
sadly it's been changed, see the discussion on the talk page. Doug Weller talk 21:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did just read WP:ERAS. In fact, I refered to it (as MOS:BCE) in this edit. Why do you ask? I believe that my revert undid an edit that went against the MOS, specifically the parts about consistency within the same article and not changing the established era style without reasons "specific to its content" and then only with consensus on the talk page. Sjö (talk) 21:38, 27 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Is it your argument that anything with a template using an era style must follow that style?  Doug Weller  talk 17:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC)


 * I’m confused. I’d appreciate if you would clarify your questions, why you ask them and why you bring up some template. I suppose that you found something wrong with one of my edits, but I can’t understand what it could be?Sjö (talk) 21:26, 28 August 2019 (UTC)=

On my edits on the Day of the Shining star
I have the sources for the edits from here. http://www.korea-dpr.info/lib/103.pdf I am new to wikipedia so I apologize for any inconvenience I may have caused.

Dprknewsbroadcasting (talk) 19:56, 8 September 2019 (UTC)Dprknewsbroadcasting


 * Discuss this on the talk page of any article that you want to change and wait until you get consensus for the changes. See WP:TALK for the guideline on talk page behaviour, to avoid disruption. But I tell you right now that you will have a hard time convincing anybody here using a state-sponsored source from a dictatorship. Sjö (talk) 20:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Can you actually access that pdf, Sjö? I only get a blank page when I click on the link. Bishonen &#124; talk 20:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC).
 * Yes, it's a book titled Kim Jong Il Brief History, published by Foreign Languages Publishing House in Pyongyang in Juche 87 (1998). The text is the flowery and sycophantic language one can expect from such a source. Sjö (talk) 04:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I still don't understand why you can see it and I can't, especially as I would have thought we edit from the same country. Oh well, nm. Bishonen &#124; talk 16:30, 9 September 2019 (UTC).

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019
Hello ,

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
 * Backlog

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
 * Coordinator

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for  making  the occasional  mistake while  others can learn from  their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
 * This month's refresher course

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
 * Deletion tags

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
 * Paid editing


 * Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
 * Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent  enhancements to  the New Pages Feed and  features in the Curation  tool, and there are still more to  come. Due to the wealth  of information  now displayed by  ORES, reviewers are strongly  encouraged to  use the system now rather than Twinkle; it  will  also  correctly  populate the logs.
 * Not English
 * A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
 * Tools

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Can you help at AN
Wondering if you can be of any assistance at Administrators' noticeboard as you seem to have dealt with this before. Especially if there are any affected pages you're aware of that haven't been found, it would probably be useful for us to know. Nil Einne (talk) 14:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

History
https://archive.archaeology.org/0405/etc/troy.html

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1993-02-22-mn-438-story.html

https://www.history.com/topics/ancient-history/trojan-war

In 3000 years, all evidence of you will be gone. Perhaps you are but a myth? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffrey.Braga (talk • contribs) 21:31, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank You for the annoucement i reallly am grateful for having you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killershark101 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter November 2019
Hello ,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon. There are now holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action. Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays. Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox. Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards. Admin has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers. Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources. Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13. The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights. There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion. To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting the queue to 0
 * Coordinator
 * This month's refresher course
 * Tools
 * It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
 * It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
 * Reviewer Feedback
 * Second set of eyes
 * Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
 * Do be sure to have our talk page  on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
 * Arbitration Committee
 * Community Wish list

Talkback
I only removed the unsourced addition. Your edits like this appear to be constituting as abuse of WP:ROLLBACK, I recommend you to self-revert. Regards Aman Kumar Goel(Talk) 12:22, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * You removed sourced info, as the source mentioned the Indian background of one or more perpetrators. Your removal of the sourced info appear to be based on your personal opinion and your edit comment was misleading. Sjö (talk) 13:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

The Eat more bar
The page and side about The Eat more bar from Hershey’s is actually not from Canada and that is because The Hershey’s is actually and original from The United States of America and all the other companies is actually not from Canada, this is actually not Canadian at all, and The Lowney Chocolate Factory is actually located in Mansfield, Massachusetts in The United States of America, but not in Canada. The Nabisco Biscuit Company is actually located in The headquartered in East Hanover, New Jersey in The United States of America, but not in Canada and PS I can see you have deleted all very important information about the Eat more bar and why have do this and done this/that my friend. Her is some links and information about The Lowney Chocolate Factory and The Nabisco Biscuit Company her down below 👇https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lowney_Chocolate_Factory

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nabisco Jonathan Thomsen (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sweden Democrats, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anti-Islam ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Sweden_Democrats check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Sweden_Democrats?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

war
Why was my important edits on pages related to Le Monke, a victim on sexual abuse removed. I am trying to document history and my work is being tarnished. I spend 50 hours on research for nothing... I come from bangladesh, 7 kids, 2 wifes. I come to the US with nothing and this is what I get. I spend life research on abuse victims and this is what I get. This is censorship and i am enraged. Please restore my edits. AND NO DELETIONS THIS IS IMPORTANT 82.219.84.29 (talk) 12:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Stop vandalizing and your edits won't be reverted. Sjö (talk) 14:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019


This year's Reviewer of the Year is. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
 * Reviewer of the Year

Special commendation again goes to who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to and  who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by.
 * Redirect autopatrol

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
 * Source Guide Discussion

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag. Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * This month's refresher course

Disambiguation link notification for December 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arvidsjaur porphyry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porphyry ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Arvidsjaur_porphyry check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Arvidsjaur_porphyry?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

WP:CSD
See WP:CSD. It is not permitted to replace a speedy tag another editor has removed (unless the person who removedthe tagwas the author of the article). Rechecking it, [[Draft:North Jutland Railways is indeed an inferior duplicate, and probably should be deleted, & I shall probably do that myself, but I or any editor has the right to remove the tag   to look at it further . Speedies are often deleted a very few minutes after placing, so if there's any doubt, the only practical course is to remove the tag.  DGG ( talk ) 21:51, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Point taken. I didn't know what to do, as it looked like someone might move that draft into article space, something that would not be an improvement to Wikipedia. Sjö (talk) 06:04, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I came here to drop a note to say that Draft:North Jutland Railways qualifies for speedy redirect which was why I closed MFD:Draft:North Jutland Railways. I was not aware another user had expressed thoughts on this draft however. If there is any objections, I'm fully willing to reconsider my close however. Regards, &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 07:41, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I thought there was unique information in the two items, but, rechecking, I was wrong. The draft should beredirected to the article. Myapologies for causing unnecessary trouble.  DGG ( talk ) 18:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)