User talk:Sjapatel/Glass cliff/Kamara03 Peer Review

Overall I thought this was a good starting point to the article.I thought this article was very interesting and had a great flow to understand. I do believe it could be more developed and have more sections. I think it gave a great initial view but could go into more detail about the effects of the glass cliff. For example, possibly dedicating a section to when the female leader succeeds in that position and its impacts on the workplace dynamics going forward. I also think that some sources were repetitive, for example although they coined the term I think there could be more research articles and more studies cited beside Ryan and Haslam's. I also think some statements could be backed by claims as well as some sources in references being replaced with peer reviewed articles.I did like the examples portion and felt it gave a good range of examples overtime. The article is well written and not necessarily poorly developed, it just could use more information on the topic. I felt that it was easy to understand and gave me a great introduction. Ultimately I would say just add more information to give it a broader and more developed view. Kamara03 (talk) 03:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)