User talk:Sjbraden

.


 * As for "clearing your name," see User:Mangojuice/A letter to sockpuppets. Specifically on using Checkuser, note that at WP:RFCU, Checkuser requests to "prove your innocence" are specifically disallowed.  Mango juice talk 15:45, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

With all due repsect, that policy is ridiculous and would obviously invite abuse, censorship, and lunatic paranoia. Secondly, why does wikipedia even allow for sock puppet allegation blocks to be appealed if there is no hope of getting a reverse? It seems like a worthless formality. The obvious danger (which is what happened to me) is that an ultra paranoid admin may start arbitrarily blocking contributors as sock puppets to ensure that the wikipage does not get altered from what he personally wants it to say. The block can't be appealed and admins are reluctant to check to the CheckUser logs are run a Checkuser list--without any explanation as to why that is the policy. A pathetic policy like this does nothing but promote skewed editing of wikipages. Thank you for your time and I hope you can respect my opinion on this manner.Scott
 * I'm a little puzzled. According to your block log, User:Nishkid64 unblocked you on May 5. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)