User talk:Sjc5912

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Columbia University School of Professional Studies, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wot3t2 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wot3t2 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Regarding page of Columbia University School of Professional Studies, I fail to see why the incorrect statement in a citation is relevant. The only purpose this would serve is to cast doubt on the veracity of the controversy, which is not in question, since primary sources have been provided for this. An incorrect statement may be contentious, but no wikipedia page like this one reports every incorrect statement made in a secondary document pertaining to the issue. At that point many wikipedia pages would have large amounts of content focusing solely on every incorrect statement made in secondary sources pertaining to the material. Since the page is not "secondary sources reporting on Columbia School of Professional Studies", there is no relevance to this here. It is the Columbia School of Professional Studies page. The incorrect statement should not be included on the page, but neither should coverage of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wot3t2 (talk • contribs) 01:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)