User talk:Sjoerddebruin

Welcome!
Hello, Sjoerddebruin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as File:Dominic Howard of Muse at Air Canada Centre, Toronto on April 10, 2013 as part of The 2nd Law tour.jpg, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Your recent edits
I had to revert one of your recent edits to Fenerbahçe S.K. as you did not explain why you removed the content fro the article. We know that it was done in good faith, and I hope this does not discourage you from editing Wikipedia. Again, welcome. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 12:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The interwiki's are now on Wikidata. The ones on the article are about the football-team, not the sports club. --Sjoerddebruin (talk) 12:30, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Restored your removals. Thanks for the HU. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 12:51, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Koekkoek
Hi Sjoerd, would you please explain your rationale for this edit here? Thx, Jane (talk) 12:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The image has nothing to do with the "subject", that is also a messy surname page to be honest. I thought those pages were for navigation?  12:31, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Why do you feel the image has nothing to do with the "subject"? In this case the subject is the surname, and the name has a meaning in Dutch, which is illustrated by the illustration you removed. Removing the visual link and keeping the audio link seems inconsistent, but I also don't see the problem with illustrating the concept of the meaning of the name. So in summary, I don't agree that the image is inappropriate and find it in fact highly appropriate as it illustrates two meanings of the concept behind the name. Navigation can be triggered visually as well as textually. Jane (talk) 15:09, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Karel van Steenhoven
You flagged this page that I recently created because of multiple issues. Has the further work I've done on it addressed your objections?

Thank you!

Theodulf 03:45, 10 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theodulf (talk • contribs)

I have made additional edits to this entry and added new information. I've also removed the flags you added a year ago. I hope this meets with your approval. BTW, I did not in fact start with a rough translation when I created this entry.

Thanks!

Theodulf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theodulf (talk • contribs) 17:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Signature
your signature [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ypnypn&diff=prev&oldid=669174821 here] violates WP:SIGNT. you need to make it automatically substituted. Frietjes (talk) 14:40, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, didn't know that. Sjoerd de Bruin   (talk)   17:13, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Britt Scholte
Hoi Sjoerd, Waarom wilt U mijn artikel verwijderen? Ik heb alle referencies toegevoegd van haar birth date enzo.. Wat is nu het probleem. And yes I can Dutch I am dutch too.--Maxie1hoi (talk) 13:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

't Spijt me
Beste Sjoerd,
 * Het spijt me oprecht dat ik een (te) felle reactie van je heb uitgelokt in de Nederlandse kroeg. Je gaf te kennen het niet goed te vinden als iemand in plaats van de knop "kopje toevoegen" handmatig == <§-titel> == toevoegem, wat in veel gevallen efficiënter is als je de § ervoor ook aan het bewerken bent. Waarom teruggan naar de top van soms hele grote pagina's? Ik was in de veronderstelling dat je het knopgebruik wilde verplichten, omdat je handmatig onduidelijk vindt. Daar heb ik ten onrechte "niet snappen" van gemaakt. Om daar nu zo'n schuttingwoord als voorvoegsel aan toe te voegen ging mij dan weer iets te ver en heb op je OP geschreven een afzetting te overwegen bij herhaling van mij zo op de letter vast te pinnen, gesteund door zo ongeveer alle collega-mods van je. Wil je me alsjeblieft niet zo vaak meer "dwingen" verduidelijking te vragen op je OP en al helemaal niet meer mijn vkucht tot het achterkamertje te bewerkstelligen? Dan kunnen we beter samenwerken, zoals we laatst op Wikidata deden. Je doet zoveel goed werk voor diverse Wikiprojecten. Laat daar je niet helemaal volmaakte sociale vaardigheden geen belemmering zijn. Dan gaat het helemaal goedkomen ook tussen ons beiden onderling. Sans rancune (?), Klaas `Z4&#x241f;` V 08:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Why did you revert?
As a general rule, parents should know account passwords in case the editor gets locked out. Also, even though parents are never going to edit, parents may want to see what s/he has been editing, and cut down on the editing. Ups and Downs 1234 21:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Is there any consensus for such a sentence to be added? Sjoerd de Bruin   (talk)   21:46, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Roar revert
Yeah, my bad, I mistakened "Roar" for "Part of Me", the latter of which was the acoustic rendition, not the former. Thanks. PatTag2659 (talk) 12:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)